This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Cost-Effectiveness and Economics (252) Registered Report (560) Cancer Survivorship (258) Web-based and Mobile Health Interventions (3297) Smoking Cessation (556) mHealth for Wellness, Behavior Change and Prevention (2871) Consumer & Patient Education and Shared-Decision Making (679) mHealth for Patient Education (230) Engagement with and Adherence to Digital Health Interventions, Law of Attrition (491) mHealth for Treatment Adherence (397)

Published on in Vol 24, No 3 (2022): March

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/27588, first published .
Effectiveness, Cost-effectiveness, and Cost-Utility of a Digital Smoking Cessation Intervention for Cancer Survivors: Health Economic Evaluation and Outcomes of a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

Effectiveness, Cost-effectiveness, and Cost-Utility of a Digital Smoking Cessation Intervention for Cancer Survivors: Health Economic Evaluation and Outcomes of a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

Effectiveness, Cost-effectiveness, and Cost-Utility of a Digital Smoking Cessation Intervention for Cancer Survivors: Health Economic Evaluation and Outcomes of a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors of this article:

Ajla Mujcic1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Matthijs Blankers2, 3, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Brigitte Boon5, 6, 7 Author Orcid Image ;   Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw8, 9 Author Orcid Image ;   Filip Smit2, 9, 10 Author Orcid Image ;   Margriet van Laar2 Author Orcid Image ;   Rutger Engels1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (8) Tweetations (3) Metrics

Journals

  1. Zhang D, Lei M, Wang Y, Zeng P, Hong Y, Cai C. Cause of Death in Patients with Oropharyngeal Carcinoma by Human Papillomavirus Status: Comparative Data Analysis. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 2023;9:e47579 View
  2. Lauridsen S, Jensen B, Tønnesen H, Dalton S, Rasmussen M. The gold standard program (GSP) for smoking cessation: a cohort study of its effectiveness among smokers with and without cancer. Acta Oncologica 2023;62(7):774 View
  3. Lim J, Zhang A, Zebrack B. Technology-Based Cancer Survivorship Care Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Research on Social Work Practice 2024;34(7):757 View
  4. Chivilgina O, Elger B, Fedotov I, Jotterand F. eHealth interventions for psychiatry in Switzerland and Russia: a comparative study. Frontiers in Digital Health 2024;5 View
  5. Sweileh W. Technology-based interventions for tobacco smoking prevention and treatment: a 20-year bibliometric analysis (2003–2022). Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2024;19(1) View
  6. Andree R, Mujcic A, den Hollander W, van Laar M, Boon B, Engels R, Blankers M. Digital Smoking Cessation Intervention for Cancer Survivors: Analysis of Predictors and Moderators of Engagement and Outcome Alongside a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Cancer 2024;10:e46303 View
  7. Dhumal T, Kelly K, Khadka S, Kelley G, Kamal K, Scott V, Hogan T, Harper F. Tobacco Cessation Interventions in Non-Respiratory Cancers: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 2024;58(9):579 View
  8. Wu C, Hao J, Xin Y, Song R, Li W, Zuo L, Zhang X, Cai Y, Wu H, Hui W. Poor sample size reporting quality and insufficient sample size in economic evaluations conducted alongside pragmatic trials: a cross-sectional survey. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2024;176:111535 View