Published on in Vol 24, No 12 (2022): December

This is a member publication of University of Oxford (Jisc)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at, first published .
Desperately Seeking Intersectionality in Digital Health Disparity Research: Narrative Review to Inform a Richer Theorization of Multiple Disadvantage

Desperately Seeking Intersectionality in Digital Health Disparity Research: Narrative Review to Inform a Richer Theorization of Multiple Disadvantage

Desperately Seeking Intersectionality in Digital Health Disparity Research: Narrative Review to Inform a Richer Theorization of Multiple Disadvantage


  1. Hughes G, Rybczynska-Bunt S, Shasha'h S, Greene S, Shaw S, Greenhalgh T. Protocol: How can people with social care needs be supported through processes of digital care navigation to access remote primary care? A multi-site case study in UK general practice of remote care as the ‘new normal’.. NIHR Open Research 2023;3:17 View
  2. Wanderås M, Abildsnes E, Thygesen E, Martinez S. Video consultation in general practice: a scoping review on use, experiences, and clinical decisions. BMC Health Services Research 2023;23(1) View
  3. Allana S, Norris C, Hussain A, Clark A. A scoping review and intersectionality‐based analysis of heart failure telehealth interventions for vulnerable populations. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2023;79(11):4097 View
  4. Ladds E, Greenhalgh T, Byng R, Rybczynska-Bunt S, Kalin A, Shaw S. A contemporary ontology of continuity in general practice: Capturing its multiple essences in a digital age. Social Science & Medicine 2023;332:116112 View
  5. Ramachandran M, Brinton C, Wiljer D, Upshur R, Gray C. The impact of eHealth on relationships and trust in primary care: a review of reviews. BMC Primary Care 2023;24(1) View
  6. Jackson K, Kaner E, Hanratty B, Gilvarry E, Yardley L, O'Donnell A. Understanding people's experiences of the formal health and social care system for co‐occurring heavy alcohol use and depression through the lens of relational autonomy: A qualitative study. Addiction 2024;119(2):268 View
  7. Artese A, Rawat R, Sung A. The use of commercial wrist-worn technology to track physiological outcomes in behavioral interventions. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care 2023;26(6):534 View
  8. GREENHALGH T, ENGEBRETSEN E, BAL R, KJELLSTRÖM S. Toward a Values‐Informed Approach to Complexity in Health Care: Hermeneutic Review. The Milbank Quarterly 2023;101(3):646 View
  9. Macgregor C, Walumbe J, Tulle E, Seenan C, Blane D. Intersectionality as a theoretical framework for researching health inequities in chronic pain. British Journal of Pain 2023;17(5):479 View
  10. Alturkistani A, Greenfield G, Beaney T, Norton J, Costelloe C. Cross-sectional analyses of online appointment booking and repeat prescription ordering user characteristics in general practices of England in the years 2018–2020. BMJ Open 2023;13(10):e068627 View
  11. Payne R, Clarke A, Swann N, van Dael J, Brenman N, Rosen R, Mackridge A, Moore L, Kalin A, Ladds E, Hemmings N, Rybczynska-Bunt S, Faulkner S, Hanson I, Spitters S, Wieringa S, Dakin F, Shaw S, Wherton J, Byng R, Husain L, Greenhalgh T. Patient safety in remote primary care encounters: multimethod qualitative study combining Safety I and Safety II analysis. BMJ Quality & Safety 2023:bmjqs-2023-016674 View
  12. Dakin F, Rai T, Paparini S, Greenhalgh T. Supporting your support staff during crises: recommendations for practice leaders to develop a relational workplace. BMJ Leader 2023;7(Suppl 2):1.1 View
  13. Bytautas J, Grigorovich A, Carson J, Fowler J, Goldman I, Harris B, Kerr A, Marcotte A, O’Doherty K, Jenkins A, Kirkland S, Kontos P. Conversation for change: engaging older adults as partners in research on gerotechnology. Research Involvement and Engagement 2024;10(1) View
  14. Vincent W. Willingness to Use Digital Health Screening and Tracking Tools for Public Health in Sexual Minority Populations in a National Probability Sample: Quantitative Intersectional Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e47448 View
  15. Husain L, Finlay T, Husain A, Wherton J, Hughes G, Greenhalgh T. Developing user personas to capture intersecting dimensions of disadvantage in older patients who are marginalised: a qualitative study. British Journal of General Practice 2024;74(741):e250 View
  16. Zhao L, Abdolkhani R, Walter R, Petersen S, Butler‐Henderson K, Livesay K. National survey on understanding nursing academics' perspectives on digital health education. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2024 View
  17. Mahmoud A, Goodwin V, Morley N, Whitney J, Lamb S, Lyndon H, Creanor S, Frost J. How can we improve Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment for older people living with frailty in primary care and community settings? A qualitative study. BMJ Open 2024;14(3):e081304 View
  18. Coetzer J, Loukili I, Goedhart N, Ket J, Schuitmaker-Warnaar T, Zuiderent-Jerak T, Dedding C. The potential and paradoxes of eHealth research for digitally marginalised groups: A qualitative meta-review. Social Science & Medicine 2024;350:116895 View
  19. Lawson McLean A, Yen T. Machine Translation for Multilingual Cancer Patient Education: Bridging Languages, Navigating Challenges. Journal of Cancer Education 2024 View
  20. Rybczynska‐Bunt S, Byng R, Spitters S, Shaw S, Jameson B, Greenhalgh T. The reflexive imperative in the digital age: Using Archer’s ‘fractured reflexivity’ to theorise widening inequities in UK general practice. Sociology of Health & Illness 2024 View
  21. Wilson S, Tolley C, Mc Ardle R, Lawson L, Beswick E, Hassan N, Slight R, Slight S. Recommendations to advance digital health equity: a systematic review of qualitative studies. npj Digital Medicine 2024;7(1) View