This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Web-based and Mobile Health Interventions (3299) Consumer & Patient Education and Shared-Decision Making (679) Innovations and Technology for Cancer Prevention and Screening (147)

Published on in Vol 24, No 10 (2022): October

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/35962, first published .
Evaluation of a Web-Based Culturally Sensitive Educational Video to Facilitate Informed Cervical Cancer Screening Decisions Among Turkish- and Moroccan-Dutch Women Aged 30 to 60 Years: Randomized Intervention Study

Evaluation of a Web-Based Culturally Sensitive Educational Video to Facilitate Informed Cervical Cancer Screening Decisions Among Turkish- and Moroccan-Dutch Women Aged 30 to 60 Years: Randomized Intervention Study

Evaluation of a Web-Based Culturally Sensitive Educational Video to Facilitate Informed Cervical Cancer Screening Decisions Among Turkish- and Moroccan-Dutch Women Aged 30 to 60 Years: Randomized Intervention Study

Authors of this article:

Nora Hamdiui1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Mart L Stein1 Author Orcid Image ;   Jim van Steenbergen1, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Rik Crutzen4 Author Orcid Image ;   Martine Bouman5 Author Orcid Image ;   Abresham Khan1 Author Orcid Image ;   Miyase N Çetin1 Author Orcid Image ;   Aura Timen1, 6 Author Orcid Image ;   Maria van den Muijsenbergh2, 7 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (8) Tweetations (4) Metrics

Journals

  1. Richardson-Parry A, Silva M, Valderas J, Donde S, Woodruff S, van Vugt J. Video Interventions for Reducing Health Inequity in Cancer Screening Programmes: a Systematic Review. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities 2024;11(5):2898 View
  2. van de Schootbrugge-Vandermeer H, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, de Jonge L, van Vuuren A, Dekker E, Spaander M, Ramakers C, Nagtegaal I, van Kemenade F, van Leerdam M, Toes-Zoutendijk E. Socio-demographic and cultural factors related to non-participation in the Dutch colorectal cancer screening programme. European Journal of Cancer 2023;190:112942 View
  3. ENDEN M, MØEN K, IGLAND J, DIAZ E. Trends in cervical cancer screening in Norway 2012–2017: a comparison study of non-immigrant and immigrant women. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 2024 View
  4. Bravo C, Walker M, Papadopoulos A, McWhirter J. Social media use in HPV-, cervical cancer-, and cervical screening-related research: A scoping review. Preventive Medicine 2024;179:107798 View
  5. Chan G, Banire B, Ataguba G, Frempong G, Orji R. A Panoramic View of Socio-Cultural Sensitivity in Digital Technologies: A Comprehensive Review and Future Directions. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 2024:1 View
  6. Alshammari A, Ishii H, Hirotsu T, Hatakeyama H, Morishita M, di Luccio E. Bridging the gap in cervical cancer screening for underserved communities: MCED and the promise of future technologies. Frontiers in Oncology 2024;14 View
  7. Buelens C, Stabel M, Wildiers A, Peremans L, Van Hal G, Van Doorsselaere L, Lievens A, Vorsters A, Van Keer S, Verhoeven V. Experiences and Perceptions of Cervical Cancer Screening Using Self-Sampling among Under-Screened Women in Flanders. Healthcare 2024;12(17):1704 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Sood S, Haileselasse R. The Handbook of Language in Public Health and Healthcare. View