This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Electronic/Mobile Data Capture, Internet-based Survey & Research Methodology (832) Recruitment of Research Participants (296) Cost-Effectiveness and Economics (252) Research Instruments, Questionnaires, and Tools (576) Development and Evaluation of Research Methods, Instruments and Tools (481) Behavioural Surveillance for Public Health (229) Health Services Research (482) Health Care Quality and Health Services Research (271)

Published on in Vol 24, No 1 (2022): January

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/26299, first published .
Unit Response and Costs in Web Versus Face-To-Face Data Collection: Comparison of Two Cross-sectional Health Surveys

Unit Response and Costs in Web Versus Face-To-Face Data Collection: Comparison of Two Cross-sectional Health Surveys

Unit Response and Costs in Web Versus Face-To-Face Data Collection: Comparison of Two Cross-sectional Health Surveys

Authors of this article:

Elise Braekman1 Author Orcid Image ;   Stefaan Demarest1 Author Orcid Image ;   Rana Charafeddine1 Author Orcid Image ;   Sabine Drieskens1 Author Orcid Image ;   Finaba Berete1 Author Orcid Image ;   Lydia Gisle1 Author Orcid Image ;   Johan Van der Heyden1 Author Orcid Image ;   Guido Van Hal2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (17) Tweetations (6) Metrics

Journals

  1. Agraib L, Alkhatib B, Al Hourani H, Al-Shami I. Are online and face-to-face questionnaires equally valid and reliable methods of assessing preconception care?. Quality & Quantity 2023;57(6):5563 View
  2. Bruggeman H, Smith P, Berete F, Demarest S, Hermans L, Braekman E, Charafeddine R, Drieskens S, De Ridder K, Gisle L. Anxiety and Depression in Belgium during the First 15 Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Longitudinal Study. Behavioral Sciences 2022;12(5):141 View
  3. Fladmoe A, Bergh J. The use of adjustment weights in voter surveys. Correcting for panel attrition and nonresponse can produce less accurate estimates of voting behavior. Electoral Studies 2022;78:102486 View
  4. Rockler Meurling C, Adell E, Wolff M, Calling S, Milos Nymberg V, Borgström Bolmsjö B. Telemedicine in Swedish primary health care - a web-based survey exploring patient satisfaction. BMC Health Services Research 2023;23(1) View
  5. Zhang S, West B, Wagner J, Couper M, Gatward R, Axinn W. Visible Cash, a Second Incentive, and Priority Mail? An Experimental Evaluation of Mailing Strategies for a Screening Questionnaire in a National Push-to-Web/Mail Survey. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 2023;11(5):1011 View
  6. Wesnawa I, Kartowagiran B, Jaedun A, Hamdi S, Hadi S, Susantini E, Sunendar D, Laliyo L, Christiawan P, Divayana D. Content Validation of Digital Instrument for Measurement of Pedagogic Competence for Social Science Teacher Candidates in the Industrial Revolution 4.0 Era in Indonesia. International Journal of Information and Education Technology 2022;12(12):1424 View
  7. Hermans L, Braekman E, Drieskens S, Demarest S. Organizing the health interview survey at the local level: design of a pilot study. Archives of Public Health 2022;80(1) View
  8. Mekanna A, Panchal S, Li L. Beyond lockdowns: a systematic review of the impacts of COVID-19 lockdowns on dietary pattern, physical activity, body weight, and food security. Nutrition Reviews 2023;81(7):790 View
  9. Braekman E, Charafeddine R, Berete F, Bruggeman H, Drieskens S, Gisle L, Hermans L, Van der Heyden J, Demarest S. Data collection in pandemic times: the case of the Belgian COVID-19 health surveys. Archives of Public Health 2023;81(1) View
  10. Fang H, Chen L, Li J, Ren L, Yin Y, Chen D, Yin H, Liu E, Hu Y, Luo X. A Web-Based Instrument for Infantile Atopic Dermatitis Identification (Electronic Version of the Modified Child Eczema Questionnaire): Development and Implementation. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e44614 View
  11. Fatima A, Shah F, Khan H, Rauf K, Jalil A, Akhter M. Association Of Electroencephalogram Patterns With Ammonia Levels In Hepatic Encephalopathy Patients. Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College 2023;27(3) View
  12. Kim S, Couper M. A National RDD Smartphone Web Survey: Comparison With a Large-Scale CAPI Survey. Social Science Computer Review 2024;42(4):1041 View
  13. Lee K. From Old to New Technologies: Exploring the Role and Impact of Value Resonance. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 2024:1 View
  14. Nomura O, Soma Y, Takiguchi M, Matsuyama Y, Tomita H. Validity arguments for creating a short motivation scale through adaptation of the Japanese motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. MedEdPublish 2024;14:14 View
  15. Ozdemir S, Quaife M, Mohamed A, Norman R. An Overview of Data Collection in Health Preference Research. The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 2024 View
  16. Kimura G, Fujii Y, Honda K, Osawa T, Uchitomi Y, Kondo M, Otani A, Wako T, Kawai D, Mitsuda Y, Sakashita N, Shinohara N. Financial Toxicity in Japanese Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Cross-Sectional Study. Cancers 2024;16(10):1904 View
  17. Sandberg A, Ravn-Fischer A, Johnsson A, Lachonius M, Bäck M. Evaluation of a digital patient education programme in patients with coronary artery disease, a survey-based study. BMC Health Services Research 2024;24(1) View