This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Personal Health Records, Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Records, Patient Portals (573) Participatory Medicine & E-Patients (773) Electronic Health Records (1053) Focus Groups and Qualitative Research for Human Factors Research (852) Adoption and Change Management of eHealth Systems (712)

Published on in Vol 23, No 5 (2021): May

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/24090, first published .
Patient Rationales Against the Use of Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Records: Qualitative Study

Patient Rationales Against the Use of Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Records: Qualitative Study

Patient Rationales Against the Use of Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Records: Qualitative Study

Authors of this article:

Hanne Støre Valeur1 Author Orcid Image ;   Anne Kveim Lie1 Author Orcid Image ;   Kåre Moen1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (10) Tweetations (6) Metrics

Journals

  1. Kainiemi E, Vehko T, Kyytsönen M, Hörhammer I, Kujala S, Jormanainen V, Heponiemi T. The Factors Associated With Nonuse of and Dissatisfaction With the National Patient Portal in Finland in the Era of COVID-19: Population-Based Cross-sectional Survey. JMIR Medical Informatics 2022;10(4):e37500 View
  2. Hägglund M, McMillan B, Whittaker R, Blease C. Patient empowerment through online access to health records. BMJ 2022:e071531 View
  3. Kujala S, Hörhammer I, Väyrynen A, Holmroos M, Nättiaho-Rönnholm M, Hägglund M, Johansen M. Patients' Experiences of Web-Based Access to Electronic Health Records in Finland: Cross-sectional Survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2022;24(6):e37438 View
  4. Zanaboni P, Kristiansen E, Lintvedt O, Wynn R, Johansen M, Sørensen T, Fagerlund A. Impact on patient-provider relationship and documentation practices when mental health patients access their electronic health records online: a qualitative study among health professionals in an outpatient setting. BMC Psychiatry 2022;22(1) View
  5. Wubante S, Tegegne M, Melaku M, Mengiste N, Fentahun A, Zemene W, Fikadie M, Musie B, Keleb D, Bewoketu H, Adem S, Esubalew S, Mihretie Y, Ferede T, Walle A. Healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitude and its associated factors toward electronic personal health record system in a resource-limited setting: A cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Public Health 2023;11 View
  6. Petrovskaya O, Karpman A, Schilling J, Singh S, Wegren L, Caine V, Kusi-Appiah E, Geen W. Patient and Health Care Provider Perspectives on Patient Access to Test Results via Web Portals: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e43765 View
  7. Ankrah E, Marathe M, Bhattacharya A, Ritt-Olson A, Milam J, Torno L, Hayes G. Plan For Tomorrow: The Experience of Adolescent and Young Adult Childhood Cancer Survivors as they Transition to Adult Care. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2023;7(CSCW2):1 View
  8. Chu S, Sisk B, Kolmar A, Malone J. Open Notes Experiences of Parents in the Pediatric ICU. Pediatrics 2024;153(5) View
  9. Roth M, Hawkins D, Merrill J, Henderson T. Childhood Cancer-Connect: Identifying solutions to elevating the cancer experience for adolescents and young adults with cancer. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2024 View
  10. Muli I, Cajander Å, Hvitfeldt H, Lagerros Y, Söderberg D, Sjöblom L, Dahlgren A, Bertilson B, Farrokhnia N, Amer-Wåhlin I, Taloyan M, Hägglund M. To read or not to read – A cross-sectional study of Swedish primary care patients’ adoption of patient accessible electronic health records. DIGITAL HEALTH 2024;10 View