This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Theoretical Frameworks and Concepts (252) Adoption and Change Management of eHealth Systems (712) Web-based and Mobile Health Interventions (3299) Design of Processes and Workflows (102) E-Health Policy and Health Systems Innovation (230) Digital Health, Telehealth and e-Innovation in Clinical Settings (401)

Published on in Vol 23, No 11 (2021): November

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/25159, first published .
The Sociological Perspective of Users’ Invisible Work: A Qualitative Research Framework for Studying Digital Health Innovations Integration

The Sociological Perspective of Users’ Invisible Work: A Qualitative Research Framework for Studying Digital Health Innovations Integration

The Sociological Perspective of Users’ Invisible Work: A Qualitative Research Framework for Studying Digital Health Innovations Integration

Authors of this article:

Dilara Vanessa Trupia1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Alexandre Mathieu-Fritz1 Author Orcid Image ;   Tu Anh Duong2, 3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (11) Tweetations (5) Metrics

Journals

  1. Gilbert R. Reimagining digital healthcare with a patient-centric approach: The role of user experience (UX) research. Frontiers in Digital Health 2022;4 View
  2. Pope C, MacLellan J, Prichard J, Turnbull J. The remarkable invisibility of NHS 111 online. Sociology of Health & Illness 2023;45(4):772 View
  3. Williatte L, Filancia A, Lindenmeyer C, Mathieu-Fritz A. Chapitre 1. Regards croisés sur les modalités et les enjeux de l’expérimentation et de la généralisation de la téléconsultation médicale. Journal international de bioéthique et d'éthique des sciences 2022;Vol. 32(4):29 View
  4. Morgan C, Tonkin E, Craddock I, Whone A. Acceptability of an In-home Multimodal Sensor Platform for Parkinson Disease: Nonrandomized Qualitative Study. JMIR Human Factors 2022;9(3):e36370 View
  5. Rowther A, Mehmood A, Razzak J, Atiq H, Castillo-Salgado C, Saleem H. “You can only help them save the patient once they trust you”: Clinician perspectives and theories of use of a pediatric emergency teleconsultation program. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health 2022;2:100150 View
  6. Nourse R, Lobo E, McVicar J, Kensing F, Islam S, Kayser L, Maddison R. Characteristics of Smart Health Ecosystems That Support Self-care Among People With Heart Failure: Scoping Review. JMIR Cardio 2022;6(2):e36773 View
  7. Trupia D, Mathieu-Fritz A, Duong T. How to produce a diagnostic opinion at a distance? New forms of tele-expertise use in France and their transformational effects on healthcare practices in dermatology. Frontiers in Communication 2023;8 View
  8. Grosjean S, Giguère L, Lessard L, Dionne É. L’usage de technologies de santé pour accéder à des soins virtuels : une enquête exploratoire pour mieux comprendre les besoins et attentes des francophones de l’Ontario. Minorités linguistiques et société 2024;(22) View
  9. Steele Gray C, Ramachandran M, Brinton C, Forte M, Loganathan M, Walsh R, Callaghan J, Upshur R, Wiljer D. Digitally mediated relationships: How social representation in technology influences the therapeutic relationship in primary care. Social Science & Medicine 2024;353:116962 View
  10. Przybylak‐Brouillard A, Nugus P, Lambert S. Walking the Talk: “Reflexivity” to Advance Integration of Patient Reported Outcomes for Cancer Care Screening. Psycho-Oncology 2024;33(10) View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Nambiar U, Tandon A, Gupta A, Sivapuram M, Ajarananda V. The Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) and Telemedicine Frameworks and Applications. View