This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Digital Health Reviews (1469) Electronic/Mobile Data Capture, Internet-based Survey & Research Methodology (905) Public (e)Health, Digital Epidemiology and Public Health Informatics (841) Registered Report (653) Innovative Methods in Public Health and Surveillance (355)

Published on in Vol 23, No 1 (2021): January

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/21382, first published .
Data Quality and Cost-effectiveness Analyses of Electronic and Paper-Based Interviewer-Administered Public Health Surveys: Systematic Review

Data Quality and Cost-effectiveness Analyses of Electronic and Paper-Based Interviewer-Administered Public Health Surveys: Systematic Review

Data Quality and Cost-effectiveness Analyses of Electronic and Paper-Based Interviewer-Administered Public Health Surveys: Systematic Review

Authors of this article:

Atinkut Alamirrew Zeleke1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Tolga Naziyok2 Author Orcid Image ;   Fleur Fritz3 Author Orcid Image ;   Lara Christianson4 Author Orcid Image ;   Rainer Röhrig2, 5 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (7) Tweetations (8) Metrics

Journals

  1. Bjøntegaard K, Stafne S, Mørkved S, Salvesen K, Evensen K. Body mass index and physical activity in seven-year-old children whose mothers exercised during pregnancy: follow-up of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMC Pediatrics 2021;21(1) View
  2. Sharifi F, Sharifi I, Babaei Z, Alahdin S, Afgar A. Bioinformatics evaluation of anticancer properties of GP63 protein-derived peptides on MMP2 protein of melanoma cancer. Journal of Pathology Informatics 2023;14:100190 View
  3. Lafave L. Is the online ‘creating healthy eating and active environments survey' (CHEERS) tool reliable for early childhood educators in Alberta, Canada: a randomized crossover trial. Archives of Public Health 2023;81(1) View
  4. Fry A, Mitchell S, Wiener L. Considerations for conducting and reporting digitally supported cognitive interviews with children and adults. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes 2021;5(1) View
  5. Gackowski M, Połomska K, Szczucka N, Wylaź M. System cyfrowy jako narzędzie poprawy koordynacji opieki zdrowotnej - badanie perspektywiczne. Prospects in Pharmaceutical Sciences 2024;22(2):1 View
  6. Downs S, Warne T, McClung S, Vogliano C, Alexander N, Kennedy G, Ahmed S, Crum J. Piloting Market Food Environment Assessments in LMICs: A Feasibility Assessment and Lessons Learned. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 2024;45(4):125 View
  7. Kutschke A, Bechmann B, Häggman‐Henrikson B, Wänman A, Durham J, Lövgren A. Exploring the Patients' Perspective on Digital Tools for Psychosocial Assessment in Dentistry. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2025;52(4):495 View