Role of Assistive Robots in the Care of Older People: Survey Study Among Medical and Nursing Students

Journals

1. Łukasik S, Tobis S, Suwalska J, Łojko D, Napierała M, Proch M, Neumann-Podczaska A, Suwalska A. The Role of Socially Assistive Robots in the Care of Older People: To Assist in Cognitive Training, to Remind or to Accompany?. Sustainability 2021;13(18):10394 View
2. Felber N, Pageau F, McLean A, Wangmo T. The concept of social dignity as a yardstick to delimit ethical use of robotic assistance in the care of older persons. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2022;25(1):99 View
3. Huang R, Li H, Suomi R, Li C, Peltoniemi T. Intelligent Physical Robots in Health Care: Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e39786 View
4. Busse T, Kernebeck S, Nef L, Rebacz P, Kickbusch I, Ehlers J. Views on Using Social Robots in Professional Caregiving: Content Analysis of a Scenario Method Workshop. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(11):e20046 View
5. Kim J, Kim S, Kim S, Lee E, Heo Y, Hwang C, Choi Y, Kong H, Ryu H, Lee H. Companion robots for older adults: Rodgers’ evolutionary concept analysis approach. Intelligent Service Robotics 2021;14(5):729 View
6. Fardeau E, Senghor A, Racine E. The Impact of Socially Assistive Robots on Human Flourishing in the Context of Dementia: A Scoping Review. International Journal of Social Robotics 2023;15(6):1025 View
7. Tobis S, Piasek-Skupna J, Neumann-Podczaska A, Suwalska A, Wieczorowska-Tobis K. The Effects of Stakeholder Perceptions on the Use of Humanoid Robots in Care for Older Adults: Postinteraction Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e46617 View
8. Schönmann M, Bodenschatz A, Uhl M, Walkowitz G. The Care-Dependent are Less Averse to Care Robots: An Empirical Comparison of Attitudes. International Journal of Social Robotics 2023;15(6):1007 View
9. Young E, Hung L, Wong J, Wong K, Yee A, Mann J, Vasarhelyi K. The perceptions of university students on technological and ethical risks of using robots in long-term care homes. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 2023;10 View
10. Schönmann M, Bodenschatz A, Uhl M, Walkowitz G. Contagious humans: A pandemic's positive effect on attitudes towards care robots. Technology in Society 2024;76:102464 View
11. Mora A, Prados A, Mendez A, Espinoza G, Gonzalez P, Lopez B, Muñoz V, Moreno L, Garrido S, Barber R. ADAM: a robotic companion for enhanced quality of life in aging populations. Frontiers in Neurorobotics 2024;18 View
12. Rehm M, Krummheuer A. When a notification at the right time is not enough: the reminding process for socially assistive robots in institutional care. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 2024;11 View
13. Sun L, Yang B, Kindt E, Chu J. Privacy Barriers in Health Monitoring: Scoping Review. JMIR Nursing 2024;7:e53592 View
14. Luo C, Yang C, Yuan R, Liu Q, LI P, He Y. Barriers and facilitators to technology acceptance of socially assistive robots in older adults - A qualitative study based on the capability, opportunity, and motivation behavior model (COM-B) and stakeholder perspectives. Geriatric Nursing 2024;58:162 View

Books/Policy Documents

1. Dankar M, Badr N. Exploring Digital Resilience. View
2. Koulouglioti C, Papadopoulos I. Transcultural Artificial Intelligence and Robotics in Health and Social Care. View
3. Morris T, Dodge H, Cerel-Suhl S, Zhao X. Social Robotics. View
4. Radic M, Radic D, Vosen A. Social Robotics. View
5. Woods D, Yuan F, Jao Y, Zhao X. Social Robotics. View
6. Webster C, Ivanov S. Handbook of Tourism and Quality-of-Life Research II. View
7. Battistoni P, Cantone A, Esposito M, Francese R, Perillo F, Romano M, Sebillo M, Vitiello G. HCI International 2023 – Late Breaking Papers. View