This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Electronic/Mobile Data Capture, Internet-based Survey & Research Methodology (792) Focus Groups and Qualitative Research for Human Factors Research (781) Patient Experiences with Diabetes Technology (29)

Published on in Vol 22, No 8 (2020): August

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/17504, first published .
Patients’ and Health Care Professionals’ Perceptions of the Potential of Using the Digital Diabetes Questionnaire to Prepare for Diabetes Care Meetings: Qualitative Focus Group Interview Study

Patients’ and Health Care Professionals’ Perceptions of the Potential of Using the Digital Diabetes Questionnaire to Prepare for Diabetes Care Meetings: Qualitative Focus Group Interview Study

Patients’ and Health Care Professionals’ Perceptions of the Potential of Using the Digital Diabetes Questionnaire to Prepare for Diabetes Care Meetings: Qualitative Focus Group Interview Study

Authors of this article:

Katarina Eeg-Olofsson1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Unn-Britt Johansson3, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Ebba Linder5 Author Orcid Image ;   Janeth Leksell6, 7 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (10) Tweetations (2) Metrics

Journals

  1. Katsogiannos P, Randell E, Sundbom M, Rosenblad A, Eriksson J, Leksell J. Quality of life after gastric bypass surgery in patients with type 2 diabetes: patients’ experiences during 2 years of follow-up. Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome 2020;12(1) View
  2. Wulaningsih I, Hapsari E, Pangastuti H, Priharjo R. Life Experience of Pregnant Woman with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Maternal Role Attainment in Special Region of Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ners 2020;15(2):199 View
  3. Svedbo Engström M, Johansson U, Leksell J, Linder E, Eeg-Olofsson K. Implementing the Digital Diabetes Questionnaire as a Clinical Tool in Routine Diabetes Care: Focus Group Discussions With Patients and Health Care Professionals. JMIR Diabetes 2022;7(2):e34561 View
  4. Kreyenschulte T, Bohnet-Joschko S. Erwartungen der Generation Y an digitale Gesundheitsinnovationen. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz 2022;65(9):881 View
  5. Jia M, Gu Y, Chen Y, Tu J, Liu Y, Lu H, Huang S, Li J, Zhou H. A methodological study on the combination of qualitative and quantitative methods in cognitive interviewing for cross‐cultural adaptation. Nursing Open 2022;9(1):705 View
  6. Guo A, Wei Y, Zhong F, Wang P. How do climate change perception and value cognition affect farmers' sustainable livelihood capacity? An analysis based on an improved DFID sustainable livelihood framework. Sustainable Production and Consumption 2022;33:636 View
  7. Ishikawa M, Yokoyama T, Takimoto H. Possible Measures to Improve Both Participation and Response Quality in Japan’s National Health and Nutrition Survey: Results from a Workshop by Local Government Personnel in Charge of the Survey. Nutrients 2022;14(19):3906 View
  8. Holmen H, Singstad T, Ribu L, Jensen A, Weldingh N, Torbjørnsen A. Adapting a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure to Digital Outpatient Specialist Health Care Services for Type 1 Diabetes: User Involvement Study. JMIR Human Factors 2022;9(4):e38678 View
  9. Torbjørnsen A, Jensen A, Singstad T, Weldingh N, Holmen H. Patient-reported outcome measures in diabetes outpatient care: a scoping review. BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care 2023;11(6):e003628 View
  10. Hung M, Licari F, Almpani K, Thao B, Janes B, Janes K, Mohajeri A, Stewart D, Cheever V, Bachstein P, Garibyan R, Bretner J, Carberry G, Lipsky M. Focus group interviews as part of a clinical research immersion experience. MedEdPublish 2024;14:22 View