Published on in Vol 22, No 8 (2020): August

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/15335, first published .
Cancer Survivors’ Receptiveness to Digital Technology–Supported Physical Rehabilitation and the Implications for Design: Qualitative Study

Cancer Survivors’ Receptiveness to Digital Technology–Supported Physical Rehabilitation and the Implications for Design: Qualitative Study

Cancer Survivors’ Receptiveness to Digital Technology–Supported Physical Rehabilitation and the Implications for Design: Qualitative Study

Journals

  1. Tomasella F, Morgan H. “Sometimes I don’t have a pulse … and I’m still alive!” Interviews with healthcare professionals to explore their experiences of and views on population-based digital health technologies. DIGITAL HEALTH 2021;7:205520762110183 View
  2. Sassenberg K, Roesel I, Sudeck G, Bernecker K, Durst J, Krauss I. The Relation of Attitude Toward Technology and Mastery Experience After an App-Guided Physical Exercise Intervention: Randomized Crossover Trial. JMIR Formative Research 2022;6(2):e28913 View
  3. Burdea G, Kim N, Polistico K, Kadaru A, Grampurohit N, Hundal J, Pollack S. Robotic Table and Serious Games for Integrative Rehabilitation in the Early Poststroke Phase: Two Case Reports. JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies 2022;9(2):e26990 View
  4. Garcia-Roca M, Rodriguez-Arrastia M, Ropero-Padilla C, Hernando Domingo C, Folch-Ayora A, Temprado-Albalat M, Boldo-Roda A, Collado-Boira E. Breast Cancer Patients’ Experiences with Online Group-Based Physical Exercise in a COVID-19 Context: A Focus Group Study. Journal of Personalized Medicine 2022;12(3):356 View
  5. Lo J, Ballurkar K, Fox S, Tynan K, Luu N, Boyer M, Murali-Ganesh R. A Digital Coaching Intervention for Cancer Survivors With Job Loss: Retrospective Study. JMIR Cancer 2021;7(4):e31966 View
  6. Kayser L, Karnoe A, Duminski E, Jakobsen S, Terp R, Dansholm S, Roeder M, From G. Health Professionals’ eHealth Literacy and System Experience Before and 3 Months After the Implementation of an Electronic Health Record System: Longitudinal Study. JMIR Human Factors 2022;9(2):e29780 View
  7. Hübner J, Rudolph I, Wozniak T, Pietsch R, Margolina M, Garcia I, Mayr-Welschlau K, Schmidt T, Keinki C. Evaluation of a Virtual Dance Class for Cancer Patients and Their Partners during the Corona Pandemic—A Real-World Observational Study. Current Oncology 2023;30(5):4427 View
  8. Krag T, Jørgensen E, Phanareth K, Kayser L. Experiences With In-Person and Virtual Health Care Services for People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Qualitative Study. JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies 2023;10:e43237 View
  9. O’Brien A, Brennan L, O’Neill L, Connolly D, Guinan E, Reynolds J, Hussey J, Custers J. Patient Experiences of a Telehealth Multidisciplinary Cancer Rehabilitation Programme: Qualitative Findings from the ReStOre@Home Feasibility Study. European Journal of Cancer Care 2023;2023:1 View
  10. Palshof M, Jeppesen F, Thuesen A, Holm C, Brøndum E, Kayser L. Comparison of the level of eHealth literacy between patients with COPD and registered nurses with interest in pulmonary diseases. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update 2023;4:100121 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Lopez-Perez L, Alonso I, Filippodou E, Mercalli F, Cavalieri S, Martinelli E, Licitra L, Manos A, Cabrera-Umpierrez M, Fico G. Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. View
  2. Kayser L, Phanareth K. Digital Respiratory Healthcare. View
  3. Bellman V. Somatic Symptoms and Related Disorders in Clinical Practice. View