This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Personal Health Records, Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Records, Patient Portals (573) Participatory Medicine & E-Patients (773) Breast Cancer (206)

Published on in Vol 22, No 2 (2020): February

Perspective of Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer on Electronic Access to Scan Results: Mixed Methods Study

Perspective of Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer on Electronic Access to Scan Results: Mixed Methods Study

Perspective of Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer on Electronic Access to Scan Results: Mixed Methods Study

Authors of this article:

Christina Baun1, 2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Marianne Vogsen1, 2, 3, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Marie Konge Nielsen5 Author Orcid Image ;   Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen1, 6 Author Orcid Image ;   Malene Grubbe Hildebrandt1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (14) Tweetations (21) Metrics

Journals

  1. Vieira L, Pires A, Grilo A. Anxiety experienced by oncological patients who undergo 18F-FDG PET CT: A systematic review. Radiography 2021;27(4):1203 View
  2. Mano M, Morgan G. Telehealth, Social Media, Patient Empowerment, and Physician Burnout: Seeking Middle Ground. American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book 2022;(42):28 View
  3. Thielmann R, Hoving C, Schutgens-Kok E, Cals J, Crutzen R. Patient online access to general practice medical records: A qualitative study on patients’ needs and expectations. Health Information Management Journal 2024;53(3):166 View
  4. Rogers C, Willis S, Gillard S, Chudleigh J. Patient experience of imaging reports: A systematic literature review. Ultrasound 2023;31(3):164 View
  5. Derry-Vick H, Heathcote L, Glesby N, Stribling J, Luebke M, Epstein A, Prigerson H. Scanxiety among Adults with Cancer: A Scoping Review to Guide Research and Interventions. Cancers 2023;15(5):1381 View
  6. Thielmann R, Hoving C, Cals J, Crutzen R. The Effects of Online Access to General Practice Medical Records Perceived by Patients: Longitudinal Survey Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e47659 View
  7. Petrovskaya O, Karpman A, Schilling J, Singh S, Wegren L, Caine V, Kusi-Appiah E, Geen W. Patient and Health Care Provider Perspectives on Patient Access to Test Results via Web Portals: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e43765 View
  8. Hussain M, Chau S, Turner M, Paterson C. Scan-Associated Distress in People Affected by Cancer: A Qualitative Systematic Review. Seminars in Oncology Nursing 2023;39(5):151502 View
  9. Butler J, Harrington M, Tong Y, Rosenbaum A, Samsonov A, Walls R, Kennedy J. From jargon to clarity: Improving the readability of foot and ankle radiology reports with an artificial intelligence large language model. Foot and Ankle Surgery 2024;30(4):331 View
  10. Thielmann R, Hoving C, Cals J, Crutzen R. Patient online access to medical records in general practice: Perceived effects after one year follow-up. Patient Education and Counseling 2024;125:108309 View
  11. van Kessel R, Ranganathan S, Anderson M, McMillan B, Mossialos E. Exploring potential drivers of patient engagement with their health data through digital platforms: A scoping review. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2024;189:105513 View
  12. Keefe A. First a Provider, Now a Patient: Receiving a Devastating Diagnosis Through the Patient Portal. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics 2024 View
  13. Alarifi M, Hughes M, Jabour A, Alashban Y, Vernon E. Patient, Referring Physician, and Radiologist Opinions Over Time on Providing Patients Access to Radiology Reports: A Systematic Review. Journal of the American College of Radiology 2024 View
  14. van der Mee F, Ottenheijm R, Gentry E, Nobel J, Zijta F, Cals J, Jansen J. The impact of different radiology report formats on patient information processing: a systematic review. European Radiology 2024 View