This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Mobile Health (mhealth) (2777) Methods and Feasibility Studies (369) User Needs and Competencies (274) mHealth in a Clinical Setting (582)

Published on in Vol 21, No 5 (2019): May

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/13387, first published .
Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Technology Intervention to Support Postabortion Care in British Columbia: Phase I

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Technology Intervention to Support Postabortion Care in British Columbia: Phase I

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Technology Intervention to Support Postabortion Care in British Columbia: Phase I

Authors of this article:

Roopan Gill1 Author Orcid Image ;   Gina Ogilvie1 Author Orcid Image ;   Wendy V Norman1 Author Orcid Image ;   Brian Fitzsimmons1 Author Orcid Image ;   Ciana Maher1 Author Orcid Image ;   Regina Renner1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (10) Tweetations (13) Metrics

Journals

  1. Gill R, Ogilvie G, Norman W, Fitzsimmons B, Maher C, Renner R. Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Technology Intervention to Support Postabortion Care (The FACTS Study Phase II) After Surgical Abortion: User-Centered Design. JMIR Human Factors 2019;6(4):e14558 View
  2. Cramer R, Wright S, Wilsey C, Kaniuka A, Bowling J, Crocker T, Langhinrichsen-Rohling J, Montanaro E, Mennicke A, Heron K. Alternative sexuality, sexual orientation and mobile technology: findings from the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom technology and health enhancement feasibility study. Psychology & Sexuality 2022;13(2):344 View
  3. Peterson S, Fok W. Mobile technology for family planning. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology 2019;31(6):459 View
  4. Baraitser P, Free C, Norman W, Lewandowska M, Meiksin R, Palmer M, Scott R, French R, Wellings K, Ivory A, Wong G. Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review. BMJ Open 2022;12(11):e066650 View
  5. Weaver M, Lukowski J, Wichman B, Navaneethan H, Fisher A, Neumann M. Human Connection and Technology Connectivity: A Systematic Review of Available Telehealth Survey Instruments. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 2021;61(5):1042 View
  6. Baniasadi T, Hassaniazad M, Rostam Niakan Kalhori S, Shahi M, Ghazisaeedi M. Developing a mobile health application for wound telemonitoring: a pilot study on abdominal surgeries post-discharge care. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2023;23(1) View
  7. Luigi-Bravo G, Maria Ramirez A, Gerdts C, Gill R. Lessons learned from developing and implementing digital health tools for self-managed abortion and sexual and reproductive healthcare in Canada, the United States, and Venezuela. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters 2023;31(4) View
  8. Gill R, Ogilvie G, Norman W, Fitzsimmons B, Maher C, Renner R. Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Technology Intervention to Support Postabortion Care After Surgical Abortion (the FACTS Study Phase 3): Mixed Methods Prospective Pilot Study. JMIR Formative Research 2024;8:e46284 View
  9. Zolfaqari Z, Ayatollahi H, Ranjbar F, Abasi A. Motivating and inhibiting factors influencing the application of mhealth technology in post-abortion care: a review study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2024;24(1) View
  10. Alhammad N, Alajlani M, Abd-alrazaq A, Epiphaniou G, Arvanitis T. Patients’ Perspectives on the Data Confidentiality, Privacy, and Security of mHealth Apps: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e50715 View