This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Theoretical Frameworks and Concepts (230) Telehealth and Telemonitoring (1556) Adoption and Change Management of eHealth Systems (670)

Published on in Vol 21, No 5 (2019): May

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/13117, first published .
Theories Predicting End-User Acceptance of Telemedicine Use: Systematic Review

Theories Predicting End-User Acceptance of Telemedicine Use: Systematic Review

Theories Predicting End-User Acceptance of Telemedicine Use: Systematic Review

Authors of this article:

Lorenz Harst1 Author Orcid Image ;   Hendrikje Lantzsch2 Author Orcid Image ;   Madlen Scheibe3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (184) Tweetations (19) Metrics

Journals

  1. Kabeza C, Harst L, Schwarz P, Timpel P. A qualitative study of users’ experiences after 3 months: the first Rwandan diabetes self-management Smartphone application “Kir’App”. Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism 2020;11:204201882091451 View
  2. Ghaddar S, Vatcheva K, Alvarado S, Mykyta L. Understanding the Intention to Use Telehealth Services in Underserved Hispanic Border Communities: Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(9):e21012 View
  3. Wangler J, Jansky M. Gesundheits-Apps als Instrumente der Prävention? – Eine Interviewstudie zu Potenzialen für das hausärztliche Setting. Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung 2020;15(4):340 View
  4. Chao C. Factors Determining the Behavioral Intention to Use Mobile Learning: An Application and Extension of the UTAUT Model. Frontiers in Psychology 2019;10 View
  5. Lin Y, Huang G, Ho Y, Lou M. Patient willingness to undergo a two‐week free trial of a telemedicine service for coronary artery disease after coronary intervention: A mixed‐methods study. Journal of Nursing Management 2020;28(2):407 View
  6. Du Y, Dennis B, Rhodes S, Sia M, Ko J, Jiwani R, Wang J. Technology-Assisted Self-Monitoring of Lifestyle Behaviors and Health Indicators in Diabetes: Qualitative Study. JMIR Diabetes 2020;5(3):e21183 View
  7. Elston D. How we judge data. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2021;85(5):1109 View
  8. Apolinário-Hagen J, Hennemann S, Fritsche L, Drüge M, Breil B. Determinant Factors of Public Acceptance of Stress Management Apps: Survey Study. JMIR Mental Health 2019;6(11):e15373 View
  9. Fatemeh Ghafari S, Mahdizadeh J, Valinejadi A, Mehraeen E, Mohammadpour A, Bouraghi H, Kahouei M. Iranian physicians’ expectations of telemedicine development and implementation infrastructures in teaching hospitals. AIMS Public Health 2019;6(4):514 View
  10. Poowuttikul P, Seth D. New Concepts and Technological Resources in Patient Education and Asthma Self-Management. Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology 2020;59(1):19 View
  11. Wangler J, Jansky M. Welchen Nutzen bringen Gesundheits-Apps für die Primärversorgung? Ergebnisse einer Befragung von Allgemeinmedizinern. Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung 2021;16(2):150 View
  12. Mueller M, Knop M, Niehaves B, Adarkwah C. Investigating the Acceptance of Video Consultation by Patients in Rural Primary Care: Empirical Comparison of Preusers and Actual Users. JMIR Medical Informatics 2020;8(10):e20813 View
  13. Jiang Y, Liu F, Guo J, Sun P, Chen Z, Li J, Cai L, Zhao H, Gao P, Ding Z, Wu X. Evaluating an Intervention Program Using WeChat for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(4):e17089 View
  14. Liu J, Zhang W, Jiang X, Zhou Y. Data Mining of the Reviews from Online Private Doctors. Telemedicine and e-Health 2020;26(9):1157 View
  15. Hayotte M, Thérouanne P, Gray L, Corrion K, d'Arripe-Longueville F. The French eHealth Acceptability Scale Using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 Model: Instrument Validation Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(4):e16520 View
  16. Broers E, Gavidia G, Wetzels M, Ribas V, Ayoola I, Piera-Jimenez J, Widdershoven J, Habibović M. Usefulness of a Lifestyle Intervention in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease. The American Journal of Cardiology 2020;125(3):370 View
  17. Kowalska M, Gładyś A, Kalańska-Łukasik B, Gruz-Kwapisz M, Wojakowski W, Jadczyk T. Readiness for Voice Technology in Patients With Cardiovascular Diseases: Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(12):e20456 View
  18. Khan I, Xitong G, Ahmad Z, Shahzad F. Investigating Factors Impelling the Adoption of e-Health: A Perspective of African Expats in China. SAGE Open 2019;9(3):215824401986580 View
  19. Jacob C, Sanchez-Vazquez A, Ivory C. Understanding Clinicians’ Adoption of Mobile Health Tools: A Qualitative Review of the Most Used Frameworks. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(7):e18072 View
  20. Fischer T, Stumpf P, Reinhardt G, Schwarz P, Timpel P. Video-based smartphone app (‘VIDEA bewegt’) for physical activity support in German adults: a study protocol for a single-armed observational study. BMJ Open 2020;10(3):e034027 View
  21. Hernández C, Valdera C, Cordero J, López E, Plaza J, Albi M. Impact of telemedicine on assisted reproduction treatment in the public health system. Journal of Healthcare Quality Research 2020;35(1):27 View
  22. Garg S, Gangadharan N, Bhatnagar N, Singh M, Raina S, Galwankar S. Telemedicine: Embracing virtual care during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care 2020;9(9):4516 View
  23. Ramírez-Correa P, Ramírez-Rivas C, Alfaro-Pérez J, Melo-Mariano A. Telemedicine Acceptance during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Empirical Example of Robust Consistent Partial Least Squares Path Modeling. Symmetry 2020;12(10):1593 View
  24. Ramírez-Rivas C, Alfaro-Pérez J, Ramírez-Correa P, Mariano-Melo A. Predicting Telemedicine Adoption: An Empirical Study on the Moderating Effect of Plasticity in Brazilian Patients. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management 2021;6(1):em0135 View
  25. Harst L, Wollschlaeger B. Smart Homes – Intelligente Systeme im häuslichen Umfeld. physiopraxis 2020;18(11/12):59 View
  26. Schmalz O, Jacob C, Ammann J, Liss B, Iivanainen S, Kammermann M, Koivunen J, Klein A, Popescu R. Digital Monitoring and Management of Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Cancer Immunotherapy and Its Impact on Quality of Clinical Care: Interview and Survey Study Among Health Care Professionals and Patients. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(12):e18655 View
  27. Willems L, Balcik Y, Noda A, Siebenbrodt K, Leimeister S, McCoy J, Kienitz R, Kiyose M, Reinecke R, Schäfer J, Zöllner J, Bauer S, Rosenow F, Strzelczyk A. SARS-CoV-2-related rapid reorganization of an epilepsy outpatient clinic from personal appointments to telemedicine services: A German single-center experience. Epilepsy & Behavior 2020;112:107483 View
  28. Johansson V, Islind A, Lindroth T, Angenete E, Gellerstedt M. Online Communities as a Driver for Patient Empowerment: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(2):e19910 View
  29. Aminoff H, Meijer S, Arnelo U, Frennert S. Telemedicine for Remote Surgical Guidance in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: Mixed Methods Study of Practitioner Attitudes. JMIR Formative Research 2021;5(1):e20692 View
  30. Palmdorf S, Stark A, Nadolny S, Eliaß G, Karlheim C, Kreisel S, Gruschka T, Trompetter E, Dockweiler C. Technology-Assisted Home Care for People With Dementia and Their Relatives: Scoping Review. JMIR Aging 2021;4(1):e25307 View
  31. Benedict C, Dauber-Decker K, King D, Hahn A, Ford J, Diefenbach M. A Decision Aid Intervention for Family Building After Cancer: Developmental Study on the Initial Steps to Consider When Designing a Web-Based Prototype. JMIR Formative Research 2021;5(1):e20841 View
  32. Serrano K, Mendes G, Lizarelli F, Ganga G. Assessing the telemedicine acceptance for adults in Brazil. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance 2020;34(1):35 View
  33. Bunnell B, Barrera J, Paige S, Turner D, Welch B. Acceptability of Telemedicine Features to Promote Its Uptake in Practice: A Survey of Community Telemental Health Providers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020;17(22):8525 View
  34. Cabrera C, Ning A, Cai Y, D'Anza B. Systematic Review of Telehealth Cost Minimization for Patients and Health Systems in Otolaryngology. The Laryngoscope 2021;131(8):1741 View
  35. Harst L, Wollschlaeger B. Smart Homes – Intelligente Systeme im häuslichen Umfeld. ergopraxis 2020;13(11/12):47 View
  36. Hui C, McKinstry B, Fulton O, Buchner M, Pinnock H. Patients’ and Clinicians’ Visions of a Future Internet-of-Things System to Support Asthma Self-Management: Mixed Methods Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(4):e22432 View
  37. McIntyre M, Robinson L, Mayo A. Practical Considerations for Implementing Virtual Care in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2020;99(6):464 View
  38. Malliaras P, Merolli M, Williams C, Caneiro J, Haines T, Barton C. ‘It's not hands-on therapy, so it's very limited’: Telehealth use and views among allied health clinicians during the coronavirus pandemic. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice 2021;52:102340 View
  39. Wangler J, Jansky M. The use of health apps in primary care—results from a survey amongst general practitioners in Germany. Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift 2021;171(7-8):148 View
  40. Niknejad N, Ismail W, Bahari M, Nazari B. Understanding Telerehabilitation Technology to Evaluate Stakeholders’ Adoption of Telerehabilitation Services: A Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Further Research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2021;102(7):1390 View
  41. Dang Y, Guo S, Guo X, Wang M, Xie K. Privacy Concerns About Health Information Disclosure in Mobile Health: Questionnaire Study Investigating the Moderation Effect of Social Support. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2021;9(2):e19594 View
  42. Reifegerste D, Harst L, Otto L. Sauerbruch, STARPAHC, and SARS: Historical Perspectives on Readiness and Barriers in Telemedicine. Journal of Public Health 2022;30(1):11 View
  43. Glassman J, Humphreys K, Yeung S, Smith M, Jauregui A, Milstein A, Sanders L. Parents’ Perspectives on Using Artificial Intelligence to Reduce Technology Interference During Early Childhood: Cross-sectional Online Survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(3):e19461 View
  44. Mastella G, Darstein L, Raufhake C, Schneider V, Corletto A, Buiatti A, Müller A, Schuessler-Hahn F, Gondert M, Gerdes H, Martens E. Offshore telemedicine emergency service: a 1-year experience. Journal of Public Health 2022;30(1):5 View
  45. Li M, Nassiri S, Liu X, Ellimoottil C. How Does Telemedicine Shape Physician’s Practice in Mental Health?. SSRN Electronic Journal 2021 View
  46. Heinsch M, Wyllie J, Carlson J, Wells H, Tickner C, Kay-Lambkin F. Theories Informing eHealth Implementation: Systematic Review and Typology Classification. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(5):e18500 View
  47. Furness K, Huggins C, Croagh D, Haines T. Exploring the Attitudes of Health Professionals Providing Care to Patients Undergoing Treatment for Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers to Different Models of Nutrition Care Delivery: A Qualitative Investigation. Nutrients 2021;13(3):1020 View
  48. Jaschinski C, Ben Allouch S, Peters O, Cachucho R, van Dijk J. Acceptance of Technologies for Aging in Place: A Conceptual Model. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(3):e22613 View
  49. Samuels-Kalow M, Jaffe T, Zachrison K. Digital disparities: designing telemedicine systems with a health equity aim. Emergency Medicine Journal 2021;38(6):474 View
  50. Octavius G, Antonio F, Colloc J. Antecedents of Intention to Adopt Mobile Health (mHealth) Application and Its Impact on Intention to Recommend: An Evidence from Indonesian Customers. International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications 2021;2021:1 View
  51. Schorr E, Gepner A, Dolansky M, Forman D, Park L, Petersen K, Still C, Wang T, Wenger N. Harnessing Mobile Health Technology for Secondary Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Older Adults: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes 2021;14(5) View
  52. Artieta-Pinedo I, Paz-Pascual C, Bully P, Espinosa M. Design of the Maternal Website EMAeHealth That Supports Decision-Making During Pregnancy and in the Postpartum Period: Collaborative Action Research Study. JMIR Formative Research 2021;5(8):e28855 View
  53. Harst L, Otto L, Timpel P, Richter P, Lantzsch H, Wollschlaeger B, Winkler K, Schlieter H. An empirically sound telemedicine taxonomy – applying the CAFE methodology. Journal of Public Health 2022;30(11):2729 View
  54. Vereenooghe L, Trussat F, Baucke K. Applying the Technology Acceptance Model to Digital Mental Health Interventions: A Qualitative Exploration with Adults with Intellectual Disabilities. Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities 2021;14(3):318 View
  55. Richter P, Harst L. Tackling the scaling-up problem of digital health applications. Journal of Public Health 2022;30(1):1 View
  56. Hayes Bauer E, Ørsted Schultz A, Brink A, Oechsle Jørgensen L, Bollig G. Patients’ and Relatives’ Preferences for a Palliative/Oncology Day Ward and Out-of-Hours Telemedicine—An Interpretive Description. Healthcare 2021;9(6):758 View
  57. Harst L, Wollschlaeger B, Birnstein J, Fuchs T, Timpel P. Evaluation is Key: Providing Appropriate Evaluation Measures for Participatory and User-Centred Design Processes of Healthcare IT. International Journal of Integrated Care 2021;21(2) View
  58. Knop M, Mueller M, Niehaves B. Investigating the Use of Telemedicine for Digitally Mediated Delegation in Team-Based Primary Care: Mixed Methods Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(8):e28151 View
  59. Zhu D, Paige S, Slone H, Gutierrez A, Lutzky C, Hedriana H, Barrera J, Ong T, Bunnell B. Exploring telemental health practice before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2024;30(1):72 View
  60. Aminoff H, Meijer S. Context and complexity in telemedicine evaluation: Work Domain Analysis in a surgical setting (Preprint). JMIR Perioperative Medicine 2020 View
  61. Hartono I, Della T, Kawi Y, Yuniarty . Determinants factor affecting user continuance usage and intention to recommend of mobile telemedicine. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2021;794(1):012079 View
  62. Liu L, Shi L. Chinese Patients’ Intention to Use Different Types of Internet Hospitals: Cross-sectional Study on Virtual Visits. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(8):e25978 View
  63. Schlief M, Saunders K, Appleton R, Barnett P, Vera San Juan N, Foye U, Olive R, Machin K, Shah P, Chipp B, Lyons N, Tamworth C, Persaud K, Badhan M, Black C, Sin J, Riches S, Graham T, Greening J, Pirani F, Griffiths R, Jeynes T, McCabe R, Lloyd-Evans B, Simpson A, Needle J, Trevillion K, Johnson S. Synthesis of the Evidence on What Works for Whom in Telemental Health: Rapid Realist Review. Interactive Journal of Medical Research 2022;11(2):e38239 View
  64. Kalańska-Łukasik B, Gładyś A, Jadczyk T, Gruz-Kwapisz M, Wojakowski W, Kowalska M. Readiness for Telemedical Services in Patients With Cardiovascular Diseases: Cross-sectional Study. JMIR Formative Research 2022;6(10):e33769 View
  65. Ong T, Wilczewski H, Soni H, Nisbet Q, Paige S, Barrera J, Welch B, Bunnell B. The Symbiosis of Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy and Telemental Health: A Review. Frontiers in Virtual Reality 2022;3 View
  66. Papachristou N, Vasileios R, Sarafis P, Bamidis P, Özden F. Translation, cultural adaptation and pilot testing of a questionnaire measuring the factors affecting the acceptance of telemedicine by Greek cancer patients. PLOS ONE 2023;18(2):e0278758 View
  67. Cannavacciuolo L, Capaldo G, Ponsiglione C. Digital innovation and organizational changes in the healthcare sector: Multiple case studies of telemedicine project implementation. Technovation 2023;120:102550 View
  68. Ng W, Zhang S, Wang Z, Ong C, Gunasekeran D, Lim G, Zheng F, Tan S, Tan G, Rim T, Schmetterer L, Ting D. Updates in deep learning research in ophthalmology. Clinical Science 2021;135(20):2357 View
  69. Mak W, Ng S, Leung F. A Web-Based Stratified Stepped Care Platform for Mental Well-being (TourHeart+): User-Centered Research and Design. JMIR Formative Research 2023;7:e38504 View
  70. Viana Pereira F, Tavares J, Oliveira T. Adoption of video consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Internet Interventions 2023;31:100602 View
  71. Setty M, Mougey E, Berg E, Rosen J, Lee J, Li B, Venkatesh R, Franciosi J. Telehealth for Pediatric Gastroenterology Care Now. JPGN Reports 2022;3(2):e182 View
  72. Musetti A, Manari T, Dioni B, Raffin C, Bravo G, Mariani R, Esposito G, Dimitriou D, Plazzi G, Franceschini C, Corsano P. Parental Quality of Life and Involvement in Intervention for Children or Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review. Journal of Personalized Medicine 2021;11(9):894 View
  73. Borrelli S, Downey J, Colciago E, Fumagalli S, Nespoli A, Spiby P. Mothers’ perspectives on the potential use of video-calling during early labour in the United Kingdom and Italy: A qualitative study. Women and Birth 2023;36(4):e405 View
  74. Broffman L, Harrison S, Zhao M, Goldman A, Patnaik I, Zhou M. The Relationship Between Broadband Speeds, Device Type, Demographic Characteristics, and Care-Seeking Via Telehealth. Telemedicine and e-Health 2023;29(3):425 View
  75. Müller A, Haneke H, Kirchberger V, Mastella G, Dommasch M, Merle U, Heinze O, Siegmann A, Spinner C, Buiatti A, Laugwitz K, Schmidt G, Martens E. Integration of mobile sensors in a telemedicine hospital system: remote-monitoring in COVID-19 patients. Journal of Public Health 2022;30(1):93 View
  76. Kang E, Song N, Ju H. Contents and sentiment analysis of newspaper articles and comments on telemedicine in Korea: Before and after of COVID-19 outbreak. Health Informatics Journal 2022;28(1):146045822210755 View
  77. Galvin K, Sucher C, Bennett R, Ebrahimi-Madiseh A, Crosland P, Eikelboom R. Willingness to consider and to pay for a variety of telehealth services amongst adult hearing clinic clients. International Journal of Audiology 2023;62(3):286 View
  78. Wilczewski H, Paige S, Ong T, Soni H, Barrera J, Welch B, Bunnell B. Providers’ Perspectives on Telemental Health Usage After the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Analysis. JMIR Formative Research 2022;6(11):e39634 View
  79. Hsiao V, Chandereng T, Huebner J, Kunstman D, Flood G, Tevaarwerk A, Schneider D. Telemedicine Use across Medical Specialties and Diagnoses. Applied Clinical Informatics 2023;14(01):172 View
  80. Velayati F, Ayatollahi H, Hemmat M, Dehghan R. Telehealth Business Models and Their Components: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2022;24(3):e33128 View
  81. Gulbransen-Diaz N, Yoo S, Wang A. Nurse, Give Me the News! Understanding Support for and Opposition to a COVID-19 Health Screening System. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2023;20(2):1164 View
  82. Butz B, Kloep L, Kriegesmann B. User experience reevaluation and diffusion of technology in the context of compulsory usage illustrated by the example of telepsychotherapy—a literature review. DIGITAL HEALTH 2022;8:205520762211344 View
  83. Tan Y, Tan M, Khor M, Hoh H, Saedon N, Hasmukharay K, Tan K, Chin A, Kamaruzzaman S, Ong T, Davey G, Khor H. Acceptance of virtual consultations among older adults and caregivers in Malaysia: a pilot study during the COVID-19 pandemic. Postgraduate Medicine 2022;134(2):224 View
  84. Schretzlmaier P, Hecker A, Ammenwerth E. Suitability of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 Model for Predicting mHealth Acceptance Using Diabetes as an Example: Qualitative Methods Triangulation Study. JMIR Human Factors 2022;9(1):e34918 View
  85. Emezue C, Enriquez M, Dougherty D, Bullock L, Bloom T. Rural young males’ acceptance & receptiveness to technology‐based interventions for dating violence prevention: A qualitative descriptive study. Journal of Adolescence 2021;92(1):137 View
  86. Van Rhoon L, McSharry J, Byrne M. Development and testing of a digital health acceptability model to explain the intention to use a digital diabetes prevention programme. British Journal of Health Psychology 2022;27(3):716 View
  87. Moses J, Adibi S, Angelova M, Islam S. Smart Home Technology Solutions for Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review. Applied System Innovation 2022;5(3):51 View
  88. Lee D, Gefen D. The Interplay of Trust and Subjective Norms in Telemedicine Adoption by a Minority Community at Einstein Medical Center Philadelphia. ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems 2022;53(4):46 View
  89. Hynie M, Jaimes A, Oda A, Rivest-Beauregard M, Perez Gonzalez L, Ives N, Ahmad F, Kuo B, Arya N, Bokore N, McKenzie K. Assessing Virtual Mental Health Access for Refugees during the COVID-19 Pandemic Using the Levesque Client-Centered Framework: What Have We Learned and How Will We Plan for the Future?. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022;19(9):5001 View
  90. Chan Z, Lim C, Leow J, Chium F, Lim S, Tong C, Zhou J, Tsi M, Tan R, Chew L. Using the technology acceptance model to examine acceptance of telemedicine by cancer patients in an ambulatory care setting. Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare 2022;31:201010582211045 View
  91. Cruz-Martínez R, Wentzel J, Sanderman R, van Gemert-Pijnen J. Tailoring eHealth design to support the self-care needs of patients with cardiovascular diseases: a vignette survey experiment. Behaviour & Information Technology 2022;41(14):3065 View
  92. Ghimire S, Martinez S, Hartvigsen G, Gerdes M. Virtual prenatal care: A systematic review of pregnant women's and healthcare professionals' experiences, needs, and preferences for quality care. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2023;170:104964 View
  93. Hui C, McKinstry B, Mclean S, Buchner M, Pinnock H. Assessing the technical feasibility of a flexible, integrated Internet-of-things connected for asthma (C4A) system to support self-management: a mixed method study exploring patients and healthcare professionals perspectives. JAMIA Open 2022;5(4) View
  94. Fischer T, Stumpf P, Schwarz P, Timpel P. Video-based smartphone app (‘VIDEA bewegt’) for physical activity support in German adults: a single-armed observational study. BMJ Open 2022;12(1):e052818 View
  95. Reinhardt G, Schwarz P, Harst L. Non-use of telemedicine: A scoping review. Health Informatics Journal 2021;27(4):146045822110431 View
  96. Harper K, Fitzgerald S, Xiyin P, Kuzich J, Leow S, Jacques A, Harris C. Does the Integration of Telehealth into Occupational Therapy Practice Impact Clinical Outcomes for Hand and Upper Limb Rehabilitation? A Matched Case Control Study. International Journal of Telerehabilitation 2022;14(2) View
  97. Calegari L, Tortorella G, Fettermann D. Getting Connected to M-Health Technologies through a Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2023;20(5):4369 View
  98. Sabbir M, Taufique K, Nomi M. Telemedicine acceptance during the COVID-19 pandemic: User satisfaction and strategic healthcare marketing considerations. Health Marketing Quarterly 2021;38(2-3):168 View
  99. Zahed K, Smith A, McDonald A, Sasangohar F. The Effects of Drowsiness Detection Technology and Education on Nurses’ Beliefs and Attitudes toward Drowsy Driving. IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors 2022;10(2):104 View
  100. Sangalli L, Fernandez-Vial D, Moreno-Hay I, Boggero I. Telehealth Increases Access to Brief Behavioral Interventions in an Orofacial Pain Clinic During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Study. Pain Medicine 2022;23(4):799 View
  101. Dempsey C, Serino-Cipoletta J, Marinaccio B, O'Malley K, Goldberg N, Dolan C, Parker-Hartigan L, Williams L, Vessey J. Determining factors that influence parents' perceptions of telehealth provided in a pediatric gastroenterological practice: A quality improvement project. Journal of Pediatric Nursing 2022;62:36 View
  102. Ong A, Kurata Y, Castro S, De Leon J, Dela Rosa H, Tomines A. Factors influencing the acceptance of telemedicine in the Philippines. Technology in Society 2022;70:102040 View
  103. Hadzic M, Eichler S, Völler H, Salzwedel A. Akzeptanz und Nutzung eines telemedizinischen Rehabilitationsprogramms für Patienten mit Knie- oder Hüft-Totalendoprothese. B&G Bewegungstherapie und Gesundheitssport 2022;38(01):20 View
  104. Wathne H, Morken I, Storm M, Husebø A. Designing a Future eHealth Service for Posthospitalization Self-management Support in Long-term Illness: Qualitative Interview Study. JMIR Human Factors 2023;10:e39391 View
  105. Rouidi M, Elouadi A, Hamdoune A, Choujtani K, Chati A. TAM-UTAUT and the acceptance of remote healthcare technologies by healthcare professionals: A systematic review. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked 2022;32:101008 View
  106. Biancone P, Secinaro S, Marseglia R, Calandra D. E-health for the future. Managerial perspectives using a multiple case study approach. Technovation 2023;120:102406 View
  107. Grosser F, Herrmann S, Bretschneider M, Timpel P, Schildt J, Bentrup M, Schwarz P. Design of the DAVOS Study: Diabetes Smartphone App, a Fully Automatic Transmission of Data From the Blood Glucose Meter and Insulin Pens Using Wireless Technology to Enhance Diabetes Self-Management—A Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology 2023;17(3):742 View
  108. Addotey-Delove M, Scott R, Mars M. The development of an instrument to predict patients’ adoption of mHealth in the developing world. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked 2022;29:100898 View
  109. Pouls B, Bekker C, van Dulmen S, Vriezekolk J, van den Bemt B. A Serious Puzzle Game to Enhance Adherence to Antirheumatic Drugs in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Systematic Development Using Intervention Mapping. JMIR Serious Games 2022;10(1):e31570 View
  110. Eichler S, Carnarius S, Steiger E, von Stillfried D. Interrupting chains of respiratory infections via remote patient monitoring in ambulatory care - a randomized controlled trial during the 2020/21 infection season. Dialogues in Health 2022;1:100021 View
  111. Rush K, Singh S, Seaton C, Burton L, Li E, Jones C, Davis J, Hasan K, Kern B, Janke R, Heyn P. Telehealth Use for Enhancing the Health of Rural Older Adults: A Systematic Mixed Studies Review. The Gerontologist 2022;62(10):e564 View
  112. Wangler J, Jansky M. Digitale Gesundheitsanwendungen (DiGA) in der Primärversorgung – Erfahrungen und Beobachtungen von Hausärzt*innen hinsichtlich der Anwendung von DiGA. Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung 2023;18(4):483 View
  113. Wu T, Ho C. Barriers to Telemedicine Adoption during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Taiwan: Comparison of Perceived Risks by Socioeconomic Status Correlates. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2023;20(4):3504 View
  114. Spaulding A, Loomis E, Brennan E, Klein D, Pierson K, Willford R, Hallbeck M, Reisenauer J. Postsurgical Remote Patient Monitoring Outcomes and Perceptions: A Mixed-Methods Assessment. Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes 2022;6(6):574 View
  115. Wangler J, Jansky M. Welche Potenziale und Mehrwerte bieten DiGA für die hausärztliche Versorgung? – Ergebnisse einer Befragung von Hausärzt*innen in Deutschland. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz 2022;65(12):1334 View
  116. Talmont E, Vitale T. Telehealth Readiness Assessment of Perinatal Nurses. Nursing for Women's Health 2022;26(2):86 View
  117. Wilczewski H, Paige S, Ong T, Barrera J, Soni H, Welch B, Bunnell B. Perceptions of Telemental Health Care Delivery During COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Study With Providers, February-March 2021. Frontiers in Psychiatry 2022;13 View
  118. Pais S, Petrova K, Parry D. Enhancing System Acceptance through User-Centred Design: Integrating Patient Generated Wellness Data. Sensors 2021;22(1):45 View
  119. Rohrmann T, Praus P, Proctor T, Benedyk A, Tost H, Hennig O, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Wahl A. Patients with affective disorders profit most from telemedical treatment: Evidence from a naturalistic patient cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychiatry 2022;13 View
  120. Saigí-Rubió F, Borges do Nascimento I, Robles N, Ivanovska K, Katz C, Azzopardi-Muscat N, Novillo Ortiz D. The Current Status of Telemedicine Technology Use Across the World Health Organization European Region: An Overview of Systematic Reviews. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2022;24(10):e40877 View
  121. Campbell J. Identifying Digital Rhetoric in the Telemedicine User Interface. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 2023;53(2):89 View
  122. Esber A, Teufel M, Jahre L, in der Schmitten J, Skoda E, Bäuerle A. Predictors of patients’ acceptance of video consultation in general practice during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic applying the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model. DIGITAL HEALTH 2023;9:205520762211493 View
  123. Stoppok P, Teufel M, Jahre L, Rometsch C, Müßgens D, Bingel U, Skoda E, Bäuerle A. Determining the Influencing Factors on Acceptance of eHealth Pain Management Interventions Among Patients With Chronic Pain Using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: Cross-sectional Study. JMIR Formative Research 2022;6(8):e37682 View
  124. Reinhardt G, Timpel P, Schwarz P, Harst L. Long-Term Effects of a Video-Based Smartphone App (“VIDEA Bewegt”) to Increase the Physical Activity of German Adults: A Single-Armed Observational Follow-Up Study. Nutrients 2021;13(12):4215 View
  125. Wulandari H, Lazuardi L, Majid N, Yokota F, Sanjaya G, Dewi T, Meliala A, Islam R, Nakashima N. Potential Improvement in a Portable Health Clinic for Community Health Service to Control Non-Communicable Diseases in Indonesia. Applied Sciences 2023;13(3):1623 View
  126. Pang N, Lau J, Fong S, Wong C, Tan K. Telemedicine Acceptance Among Older Adult Patients With Cancer: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2022;24(3):e28724 View
  127. Rodríguez-Fernández J, Danies E, Hoertel N, Galanter W, Saner H, Franco O. Telemedicine Readiness Across Medical Conditions in a US National Representative Sample of Older Adults. Journal of Applied Gerontology 2022;41(4):982 View
  128. Aminoff H, Meijer S, Groth K, Arnelo U. User Experience in Remote Surgical Consultation: Survey Study of User Acceptance and Satisfaction in Real-Time Use of a Telemedicine Service. JMIR Human Factors 2021;8(4):e30867 View
  129. Arensman R, Kloek C, Pisters M, Koppenaal T, Ostelo R, Veenhof C. Patient Perspectives on Using a Smartphone App to Support Home-Based Exercise During Physical Therapy Treatment: Qualitative Study. JMIR Human Factors 2022;9(3):e35316 View
  130. Borchers P, Pfisterer D, Scherpf M, Voigt K, Bergmann A, Papa F. Needs- and user-oriented development of contactless camera-based telemonitoring in heart disease–Results of an acceptance survey from the Home-based Healthcare Project (feasibility project). PLOS ONE 2023;18(3):e0282527 View
  131. Wangler J, Jansky M. Two years of approved digital health applications in Germany – Perspectives and experiences of general practitioners with an affinity for their use. European Journal of General Practice 2023;29(1) View
  132. Aloini D, Pellegrini L, Latronico L, Cannavacciuolo L. Open innovation and technology adoption during emergency. Lessons from a case study in telemedicine in time of COVID-19. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 2023:1 View
  133. Raes S, Annemans L, Willems R, Trybou J. Physicians’ views on optimal use and payment system for telemedicine: a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research 2023;23(1) View
  134. Calegari L, R.D. B, Fettermann D. A meta-analysis of a comprehensive m-health technology acceptance. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma 2024;15(1):1 View
  135. Tadayon H, Nafari B, Khadem G, Darrudi R, Sadeqi Jabali M. Evaluation of Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS): Radiologists’ perspective. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked 2023;39:101266 View
  136. Yedilbayev Y, Sarybayeva A, Zharylgapova D, Shektibayev N, Usembayeva I, Kurbanbekov B. Factors influencing future physics teachers’ acceptance of information and communicative competence technologies: A survey study. Cogent Education 2023;10(1) View
  137. Cascini F, Gentili A, Melnyk A, Beccia F, Causio F, Solimene V, Battilomo S, Paone S, Borghini A, Bartolo M, Chiarolla E, Ricciardi W. A new digital model for the Italian Integrated Home Care: strengths, barriers, and future implications. Frontiers in Public Health 2023;11 View
  138. Borrelli S, Fumagalli S, Colciago E, Downey J, Spiby H, Nespoli A. How should a video-call service for early labour be provided? A qualitative study of midwives’ perspectives in the United Kingdom and Italy. Women and Birth 2023;36(6):504 View
  139. Graf L, Tesch F, Gräßer F, Harst L, Siegels D, Schmitt J, Abraham S. Acceptance of a digital therapy recommender system for psoriasis. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2023;23(1) View
  140. Kuen L, Schürmann F, Westmattelmann D, Hartwig S, Tzafrir S, Schewe G. Trust transfer effects and associated risks in telemedicine adoption. Electronic Markets 2023;33(1) View
  141. Thielecke J, Buntrock C, Freund J, Braun L, Ebert D, Berking M, Baumeister H, Titzler I. How to promote usage of telehealth interventions for farmers' mental health? A qualitative study on supporting and hindering aspects for acceptance and satisfaction with a personalized telephone coaching for depression prevention. Internet Interventions 2023;34:100671 View
  142. Neumann A, König H, Bokermann J, Hajek A. Determinants of Patient Use and Satisfaction With Synchronous Telemental Health Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review. JMIR Mental Health 2023;10:e46148 View
  143. Paige S, Bylund C, Wilczewski H, Ong T, Barrera J, Welch B, Bunnell B. Communicating about online health information with patients: Exploring determinants among telemental health providers. PEC Innovation 2023;2:100176 View
  144. Hasan M, Rafferty M, Tawfik S, Tawfik A, Beestrum M, Smith J, Hirschhorn L, Roth E, Woods D. Implementation of Home-Based Telerehabilitation of Patients With Stroke in the United States: Protocol for a Realist Review. JMIR Research Protocols 2023;12:e47009 View
  145. Wang E, Kennedy K, Zhang L, Qian D, Forbes T, Zuniga-Hernandez M, Li B, Domingue B, Caruso T. Predicting pediatric healthcare provider use of virtual reality using a technology acceptance model. JAMIA Open 2023;6(3) View
  146. Liekefett L, Rumpf H, Bischof G. Akzeptanz und Nutzermotivation einer Digitalen Alkohol Nachsorge App (DANA) bei Rehabilitand:innen mit Alkoholgebrauchsstörungen. Suchttherapie 2023;24(03):144 View
  147. Maghsoudi M, Nezafati N. Navigating the acceptance of implementing business intelligence in organizations: A system dynamics approach. Telematics and Informatics Reports 2023;11:100070 View
  148. Farzin I, Mamdoohi A, Abbasi M, Baghestani A, Ciari F. Determinants behind the acceptance of autonomous vehicles in mandatory and optional trips. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering Sustainability 2023:1 View
  149. Sharka R, Sedayo L, Aldahwani S, Alyamani L, Budayri R, Qari A. Factors Affecting the Adoption of Teledentistry Based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Model. Cureus 2023 View
  150. Buba M, Dulude C, O’Donnell R, Rowan-Legg A, Sloan M, Nelson M, King W. Virtual family-centered rounds: a quality improvement initiative to adapt inpatient care during COVID-19 using a human-centred participatory design approach. BMC Pediatrics 2023;23(1) View
  151. Hynie M, Oda A, Calaresu M, Kuo B, Ives N, Jaimes A, Bokore N, Beukeboom C, Ahmad F, Arya N, Samuel R, Farooqui S, Palmer-Dyer J, McKenzie K. Access to Virtual Mental Healthcare and Support for Refugee and Immigrant Groups: A Scoping Review. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health 2023;25(5):1171 View
  152. Hossain M, Amin R, Masud A, Hossain M, Hossen M, Hossain M. What Drives People’s Behavioral Intention Toward Telemedicine? An Emerging Economy Perspective. SAGE Open 2023;13(3) View
  153. Geiger S, Steinbach J, Skoda E, Jahre L, Rentrop V, Kocol D, Jansen C, Schüren L, Niedergethmann M, Teufel M, Bäuerle A. Needs and Demands for e-Mental Health Interventions in Individuals with Overweight and Obesity: User-Centred Design Approach. Obesity Facts 2023;16(2):173 View
  154. de Bell S, Zhelev Z, Shaw N, Bethel A, Anderson R, Thompson Coon J. Remote monitoring for long-term physical health conditions: an evidence and gap map. Health and Social Care Delivery Research 2023:1 View
  155. Duevel J, Baumgartner A, Grosser J, Kreimeier S, Elkenkamp S, Greiner W. A Case Management Approach in Stroke Care. Professional Case Management 2024;29(4):158 View
  156. Praha N, Sriyuktasuth A, Puwarawuttipanit W, Chuengsaman P, Kusakunniran W. Factors Influencing Telehealth Service Use and Health Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis: Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e48623 View
  157. Schlieter H, Kählig M, Hickmann E, Fürstenau D, Sunyaev A, Richter P, Breitschwerdt R, Thielscher C, Gersch M, Maaß W, Reuter-Oppermann M, Wiese L. Digitale Gesundheitsanwendungen (DiGA) im Spannungsfeld von Fortschritt und Kritik. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz 2024;67(1):107 View
  158. Cai Z, He H, Huo W, Xu X. More Unique, More Accepting? Integrating Sense of Uniqueness, Perceived Knowledge, and Perceived Empathy with Acceptance of Medical Artificial Intelligence. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 2023:1 View
  159. Shelke S, Veerubhotla K, Lee Y, Lee C. Telehealth of cardiac devices for CVD treatment. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2024;121(3):823 View
  160. Nurtsch A, Teufel M, Jahre L, Esber A, Rausch R, Tewes M, Schöbel C, Palm S, Schuler M, Schadendorf D, Skoda E, Bäuerle A. Drivers and barriers of patients’ acceptance of video consultation in cancer care. DIGITAL HEALTH 2024;10 View
  161. Stein A, Thorstensen J, Ho J, Ashley D, Iyer K, Barlow K. Attention Please! Unravelling the Link Between Brain Network Connectivity and Cognitive Attention Following Acquired Brain Injury: A Systematic Review of Structural and Functional Measures. Brain Connectivity 2024;14(1):4 View
  162. Helms Y, Stein M, Hamdiui N, van der Meer A, Ferreira J, Crutzen R, Timen A, Kretzschmar M, Ayatollahi H. Determinants of Dutch public health professionals’ intention to use digital contact tracing support tools: A cross-sectional online questionnaire study. PLOS Digital Health 2024;3(2):e0000425 View
  163. Tsatsos M, Rodafinos A, Athanasiadis I, Mavropoulou D. Patients’ Intentions to Use Telemedicine for Ophthalmic Medical Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Cureus 2024 View
  164. Wangler J, Jansky M. How can primary care benefit from digital health applications? – a quantitative, explorative survey on attitudes and experiences of general practitioners in Germany. BMC Digital Health 2024;2(1) View
  165. Woon L, Maguire P, Reay R, Looi J. Telepsychiatry in Australia: A Scoping Review. INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing 2024;61 View
  166. Boschetti A, Maida E, Dini M, Tacchini M, Gamberini G, Comi G, Leocani L. A Review on the Feasibility and Efficacy of Home-Based Cognitive Remediation in People with Multiple Sclerosis. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2024;13(7):1916 View
  167. Knop M, Mueller M, Kaiser S, Rester C. The impact of digital technology use on nurses' professional identity and relations of power: a literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2024 View
  168. Nissinen S, Pesonen S, Toivio P, Sormunen E. Exploring the use, usefulness and ease of use of digital occupational health services: A descriptive correlational study of customer experiences. DIGITAL HEALTH 2024;10 View
  169. Yeung N, Lau S, Mak W, Cheng C, Chan E, Siu J, Cheung P. Applying the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology to Identify Factors Associated With Intention to Use Teledelivered Supportive Care Among Recently Diagnosed Breast Cancer Survivors During COVID-19 in Hong Kong: Cross-Sectional Survey. JMIR Cancer 2024;10:e51072 View
  170. Nabelsi V, Lévesque-Chouinard A. Successful Electronic Consultation Service Initiative in Quebec, Canada With Primary Care Physicians’ and Specialists’ Experiences on Acceptance and Use of Technological Innovation: Cross-Sectional Exploratory Study. JMIR Formative Research 2024;8:e52921 View
  171. Katz C, Robles N, Novillo-Ortiz D, Saigí-Rubió F. Selection of criteria for a telemedicine framework for designing, implementing, monitoring and evaluating telemedicine interventions: Validation using a modified Delphi process. DIGITAL HEALTH 2024;10 View
  172. Laursen S, Giese I, Udsen F, Hejlesen O, Barington P, Ohrt M, Vestergaard P, Hangaard S. A telemonitoring intervention design for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: protocol for a feasibility study. Pilot and Feasibility Studies 2024;10(1) View
  173. Schröder J, Dinse H, Maria Jahre L, Skoda E, Stettner M, Kleinschnitz C, Teufel M, Bäuerle A. Needs and Demands for e-Health Symptom Management Interventions in Patients with Post-COVID-19 Condition: A User-Centered Design Approach. Telemedicine and e-Health 2024 View
  174. Kung L, Yan Y, Kung C. Exploring Telemedicine Usage Intention Using Technology Acceptance Model and Social Capital Theory. Healthcare 2024;12(13):1267 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Kotovnykova T, Rossmann C, Reifegerste D. PR und Organisationskommunikation im Gesundheitswesen. View
  2. Yip M, Wang Z, Gutierrez L, Foo V, Lim J, Lim G, Gunasekaran D, Wong T, Ting D. Nanotechnology for Diabetes Management. View
  3. Schlieter H, Harst L, Otto L, Richter P, Timpel P, Knapp A, Wollschlaeger B. E-Health-Ökonomie II. View
  4. Wersényi G, Tollár J. Rethinking Management and Economics in the New 20’s. View
  5. Marouane M, Salwa M, Hebaz A. Inventive Communication and Computational Technologies. View
  6. Lukovic V. Challenges of Healthcare Systems in the Era of COVID-19. View