Predictors of Postal or Online Response Mode and Associations With Patient Experience and Satisfaction in the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey

Journals

1. Nartey Y, Stewart I, Khakwani A, Beattie V, Wilcock A, Woolhouse I, Beckett P, Hubbard R, Tata L. Is the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey representative? A comparative analysis with the National Lung Cancer Audit. Lung Cancer 2020;140:27 View
2. Gooden T, Wright A, Swinn E, Sizmur S. Optimising response rates in a national postal survey evaluating community mental health care: four interventions trialled. Journal of Mental Health 2023;32(1):96 View
3. Wong H, Brusseleers M, Hall K, Maiden M, Chapple L, Chapman M, Hodgson C, Gluck S. Mixed-mode versus paper surveys for patient-reported outcomes after critical illness: A randomised controlled trial. Australian Critical Care 2022;35(3):286 View
4. Alessy S, Alhajji M, Rawlinson J, Baker M, Davies E. Factors influencing cancer patients’ experiences of care in the USA, United Kingdom, and Canada: A systematic review. eClinicalMedicine 2022;47:101405 View
5. Nartey Y, Tata L, Khakwani A, Beattie V, Beckett P, Hubbard R, Stewart I. Using patient experiences to evaluate care and expectations in lung cancer: analysis of the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey linked with the national cancer registry. Supportive Care in Cancer 2022;30(5):4417 View
6. Arditi C, Eicher M, Colomer‐Lahiguera S, Bienvenu C, Anchisi S, Betticher D, Dietrich P, Duchosal M, Peters S, Peytremann‐Bridevaux I. Patients' experiences with cancer care in Switzerland: Results of a multicentre cross‐sectional survey. European Journal of Cancer Care 2022;31(6) View
7. Liu M, Hu L, Xu Y, Wang Y, Liu Y. Patient healthcare experiences of cancer hospitals in China: A multilevel modeling analysis based on a national survey. Frontiers in Public Health 2023;11 View