This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Telehealth and Telemonitoring (1575) Hypertension Prevention and Treatment (207) Perinatal Education for Parents (210)

Published on in Vol 21, No 4 (2019): April

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/10887, first published .
Midwives’, Obstetricians’, and Recently Delivered Mothers’ Perceptions of Remote Monitoring for Prenatal Care: Retrospective Survey

Midwives’, Obstetricians’, and Recently Delivered Mothers’ Perceptions of Remote Monitoring for Prenatal Care: Retrospective Survey

Midwives’, Obstetricians’, and Recently Delivered Mothers’ Perceptions of Remote Monitoring for Prenatal Care: Retrospective Survey

Authors of this article:

Dorien Lanssens1, 2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Thijs Vandenberk1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Joy Lodewijckx1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Tessa Peeters1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Valerie Storms1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Inge M Thijs1, 2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Lars Grieten1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Wilfried Gyselaers1, 2, 3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (11) Tweetations (2) Metrics

Journals

  1. Vickery M, van Teijlingen E, Hundley V, Smith G, Way S, Westwood G. Midwives’ views towards women using mHealth and eHealth to self-monitor their pregnancy: A systematic review of the literature. European Journal of Midwifery 2020;4(September):1 View
  2. Jongsma K, van den Heuvel J, Rake J, Bredenoord A, Bekker M. User Experiences With and Recommendations for Mobile Health Technology for Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(8):e17271 View
  3. van den Heuvel J, Ayubi S, Franx A, Bekker M. Home-Based Monitoring and Telemonitoring of Complicated Pregnancies: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey of Current Practice in the Netherlands. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(10):e18966 View
  4. Jongsma K, Bekker M, Haitjema S, Bredenoord A. How digital health affects the patient-physician relationship: An empirical-ethics study into the perspectives and experiences in obstetric care. Pregnancy Hypertension 2021;25:81 View
  5. Goeckenjan M, Brückner A, Vetter K. Schwangerenvorsorge. Der Gynäkologe 2021;54(8):579 View
  6. Hinton L, Dakin F, Kuberska K, Boydell N, Willars J, Draycott T, Winter C, McManus R, Chappell L, Chakrabarti S, Howland E, George J, Leach B, Dixon-Woods M. Quality framework for remote antenatal care: qualitative study with women, healthcare professionals and system-level stakeholders. BMJ Quality & Safety 2022:bmjqs-2021-014329 View
  7. Metoki H, Iwama N, Hamada H, Satoh M, Murakami T, Ishikuro M, Obara T. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: definition, management, and out-of-office blood pressure measurement. Hypertension Research 2022;45(8):1298 View
  8. Zhang Z, Chen J. The Enterprise's Willingness to Use Remote Monitoring Technology Under the Background of Green Operation and Service-Oriented Manufacturing. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing 2023;35(2):1 View
  9. LANSSENS D, THIJS I, GYSELAERS W, II-CONSORTIUM P. Pregnancy REmote MOnitoring: de toegevoegde waarde van telemonitoring in de prenatale opvolging van door gestationele hypertensieve aandoeningen gecompliceerde zwangerschappen. Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 2021 View
  10. Gemperle M, Grylka-Baeschlin S, Klamroth-Marganska V, Ballmer T, Gantschnig B, Pehlke-Milde J. Midwives’ perception of advantages of health care at a distance during the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland. Midwifery 2022;105:103201 View
  11. Aasbø G, Staff A, Blix E, Pay A, Waldum Å, Rivedal S, Solbrække K. Expectations related to home‐based telemonitoring of high‐risk pregnancies: A qualitative study addressing healthcare providers' and users' views in Norway. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2024;103(2):276 View