Published on in Vol 21, No 4 (2019): April

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/10887, first published .
Midwives’, Obstetricians’, and Recently Delivered Mothers’ Perceptions of Remote Monitoring for Prenatal Care: Retrospective Survey

Midwives’, Obstetricians’, and Recently Delivered Mothers’ Perceptions of Remote Monitoring for Prenatal Care: Retrospective Survey

Midwives’, Obstetricians’, and Recently Delivered Mothers’ Perceptions of Remote Monitoring for Prenatal Care: Retrospective Survey

Journals

  1. Vickery M, van Teijlingen E, Hundley V, Smith G, Way S, Westwood G. Midwives’ views towards women using mHealth and eHealth to self-monitor their pregnancy: A systematic review of the literature. European Journal of Midwifery 2020;4(September):1 View
  2. Jongsma K, van den Heuvel J, Rake J, Bredenoord A, Bekker M. User Experiences With and Recommendations for Mobile Health Technology for Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(8):e17271 View
  3. van den Heuvel J, Ayubi S, Franx A, Bekker M. Home-Based Monitoring and Telemonitoring of Complicated Pregnancies: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey of Current Practice in the Netherlands. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(10):e18966 View
  4. Jongsma K, Bekker M, Haitjema S, Bredenoord A. How digital health affects the patient-physician relationship: An empirical-ethics study into the perspectives and experiences in obstetric care. Pregnancy Hypertension 2021;25:81 View
  5. Goeckenjan M, Brückner A, Vetter K. Schwangerenvorsorge. Der Gynäkologe 2021;54(8):579 View
  6. Hinton L, Dakin F, Kuberska K, Boydell N, Willars J, Draycott T, Winter C, McManus R, Chappell L, Chakrabarti S, Howland E, George J, Leach B, Dixon-Woods M. Quality framework for remote antenatal care: qualitative study with women, healthcare professionals and system-level stakeholders. BMJ Quality & Safety 2022:bmjqs-2021-014329 View
  7. Metoki H, Iwama N, Hamada H, Satoh M, Murakami T, Ishikuro M, Obara T. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: definition, management, and out-of-office blood pressure measurement. Hypertension Research 2022;45(8):1298 View
  8. Zhang Z, Chen J. The Enterprise's Willingness to Use Remote Monitoring Technology Under the Background of Green Operation and Service-Oriented Manufacturing. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing 2023;35(2):1 View
  9. LANSSENS D, THIJS I, GYSELAERS W, II-CONSORTIUM P. Pregnancy REmote MOnitoring: de toegevoegde waarde van telemonitoring in de prenatale opvolging van door gestationele hypertensieve aandoeningen gecompliceerde zwangerschappen. Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 2021 View
  10. Gemperle M, Grylka-Baeschlin S, Klamroth-Marganska V, Ballmer T, Gantschnig B, Pehlke-Milde J. Midwives’ perception of advantages of health care at a distance during the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland. Midwifery 2022;105:103201 View
  11. Aasbø G, Staff A, Blix E, Pay A, Waldum Å, Rivedal S, Solbrække K. Expectations related to home‐based telemonitoring of high‐risk pregnancies: A qualitative study addressing healthcare providers' and users' views in Norway. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2024;103(2):276 View
  12. Gerits M, Bielen S, Lanssens D, Luyten J. Door de ogen van de patiënt: tele- en zelfmonitoring voor zwangere vrouwen met een verhoogd risico op hypertensie. Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 2024 View