This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Innovations and Technology for Physical Activity Education (742) Fitness Trackers and Smart Pedometers/Accelerometers (561) mHealth for Wellness, Behavior Change and Prevention (2872) Wearable Devices and Sensors (889)

Published on in Vol 21, No 3 (2019): March

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/12374, first published .
Acceptability and Feasibility of Implementing Accelorometry-Based Activity Monitors and a Linked Web Portal in an Exercise Referral Scheme: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial

Acceptability and Feasibility of Implementing Accelorometry-Based Activity Monitors and a Linked Web Portal in an Exercise Referral Scheme: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial

Acceptability and Feasibility of Implementing Accelorometry-Based Activity Monitors and a Linked Web Portal in an Exercise Referral Scheme: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors of this article:

Jemma Hawkins1 Author Orcid Image ;   Joanna M Charles2 Author Orcid Image ;   Michelle Edwards3 Author Orcid Image ;   Britt Hallingberg1 Author Orcid Image ;   Linda McConnon1 Author Orcid Image ;   Rhiannon Tudor Edwards2 Author Orcid Image ;   Russell Jago4 Author Orcid Image ;   Mark Kelson5 Author Orcid Image ;   Kelly Morgan1 Author Orcid Image ;   Simon Murphy1 Author Orcid Image ;   Emily J. Oliver6 Author Orcid Image ;   Sharon A. Simpson7 Author Orcid Image ;   Graham Moore1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (20) Tweetations (26) Metrics

Jemma Hawkins   1 , PhD ;   Joanna M Charles   2 , PhD ;   Michelle Edwards   3 , PhD ;   Britt Hallingberg   1 , PhD ;   Linda McConnon   1 , PhD ;   Rhiannon Tudor Edwards   2 , PhD ;   Russell Jago   4 , PhD ;   Mark Kelson   5 , PhD ;   Kelly Morgan   1 , PhD ;   Simon Murphy   1 , PhD ;   Emily J. Oliver   6 , PhD ;   Sharon A. Simpson   7 , PhD ;   Graham Moore   1 , PhD

1 DECIPHer, School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom

2 Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom

3 Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom

4 Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom

5 Institute for Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, School of Mathematics, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom

6 Department of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom

7 MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom

Corresponding Author: