This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Demographics of Users, Social & Digital Divide (739) Information Seeking, Information Needs (465)

Published on in Vol 21, No 3 (2019): March

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/11279, first published .
Characterizing the Digital Health Citizen: Mixed-Methods Study Deriving a New Typology

Characterizing the Digital Health Citizen: Mixed-Methods Study Deriving a New Typology

Characterizing the Digital Health Citizen: Mixed-Methods Study Deriving a New Typology

Authors of this article:

John Powell1 Author Orcid Image ;   Ulrike Deetjen2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (15) Tweetations (17) Metrics

Journals

  1. Farahany N, Ramos K. Neuroethics: Fostering Collaborations to Enable Neuroscientific Discovery. AJOB Neuroscience 2020;11(3):148 View
  2. FitzPatrick M, Hess A, Sudbury-Riley L, Schulz P. A Typology of Patients Based on Decision-Making Styles: Cross-Sectional Survey Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(11):e15332 View
  3. Powell J, Atherton H, Williams V, Mazanderani F, Dudhwala F, Woolgar S, Boylan A, Fleming J, Kirkpatrick S, Martin A, van Velthoven M, de Iongh A, Findlay D, Locock L, Ziebland S. Using online patient feedback to improve NHS services: the INQUIRE multimethod study. Health Services and Delivery Research 2019;7(38):1 View
  4. Morley J, Machado C, Burr C, Cowls J, Joshi I, Taddeo M, Floridi L. The ethics of AI in health care: A mapping review. Social Science & Medicine 2020;260:113172 View
  5. Heponiemi T, Jormanainen V, Leemann L, Manderbacka K, Aalto A, Hyppönen H. Digital Divide in Perceived Benefits of Online Health Care and Social Welfare Services: National Cross-Sectional Survey Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(7):e17616 View
  6. Batchelor R, Gulshan S, Shritharan H, Williams E, Henderson C, Gillard S, Woodham L, Cornelius V, Elkes J, Sin J. Perceived Acceptability and Experiences of a Digital Psychoeducation and Peer Support Intervention (COPe-support): Interview Study With Carers Supporting Individuals With Psychosis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2022;24(2):e27781 View
  7. Montgomery C, Powell J, Mahtani K, Boylan A. Turning the gaze: Digital patient feedback and the silent pathology of the NHS. Sociology of Health & Illness 2022;44(2):290 View
  8. Al Mushaikhi M, Taylor J, Donagh B, Swift A. Health Education, its Methods and Effects on Parents’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviours to Prevent Unintentional Child Injuries at Home: A Systematic Review. Child Care in Practice 2022:1 View
  9. Sin J, Henderson C, Elkes J, Cornelius V, Woodham L, Batchelor R, Chen T, Corredor A, Coughlan D, Dhital R, Evans S, Haider B, Heathcote J, Mansfield S, O'Brien A, Qassim M, Sserunkuma J, Travis C, Williams E, Gillard S. Effect of digital psychoeducation and peer support on the mental health of family carers supporting individuals with psychosis in England (COPe-support): a randomised clinical trial. The Lancet Digital Health 2022;4(5):e320 View
  10. Wei Q, Wang X, Zhang G, Li X, Yang X, Gu D. Internet Healthcare Policy Analysis, Evaluation, and Improvement Path: Multidimensional Perspectives. Healthcare 2023;11(13):1905 View
  11. Myneni S, Zingg A, Singh T, Ross A, Franklin A, Rogith D, Refuerzo J. Digital health technologies for high-risk pregnancy management: three case studies using Digilego framework. JAMIA Open 2024;7(1) View
  12. Wang Y, Shi C, Wang X, Meng H, Chen J. The Relationship Between Static Characteristics of Physicians and Patient Consultation Volume in Internet Hospitals: Quantitative Analysis. JMIR Formative Research 2024;8:e56687 View
  13. Derr J, Schrode K. Empowering Patients Through Health Information. Physician Assistant Clinics 2024;9(4):487 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Morley J, Floridi L. The 2020 Yearbook of the Digital Ethics Lab. View
  2. Morley J, Machado C, Burr C, Cowls J, Joshi I, Taddeo M, Floridi L. Ethics, Governance, and Policies in Artificial Intelligence. View