This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Participatory Medicine & E-Patients (773) Electronic/Mobile Data Capture, Internet-based Survey & Research Methodology (832)

Published on in Vol 21, No 1 (2019): January

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/9076, first published .
Evaluating Digital Maturity and Patient Acceptability of Real-Time Patient Experience Feedback Systems: Systematic Review

Evaluating Digital Maturity and Patient Acceptability of Real-Time Patient Experience Feedback Systems: Systematic Review

Evaluating Digital Maturity and Patient Acceptability of Real-Time Patient Experience Feedback Systems: Systematic Review

Authors of this article:

Mustafa Khanbhai1 Author Orcid Image ;   Kelsey Flott1 Author Orcid Image ;   Ara Darzi1 Author Orcid Image ;   Erik Mayer1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (7) Tweetations (25) Metrics

Journals

  1. Büyüközkan G, Güler M, Kahraman C. Analysis of companies’ digital maturity by hesitant fuzzy linguistic MCDM methods. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 2020;38(1):1119 View
  2. Johnston S, Hogg W, Wong S, Burge F, Peterson S. Differences in Mode Preferences, Response Rates, and Mode Effect Between Automated Email and Phone Survey Systems for Patients of Primary Care Practices: Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(1):e21240 View
  3. Philips K, Dadlez N, Fazzari M, Samuel S, Southern W, Heo M, Azad N, Drasher M, Rinke M. Effect of Real-Time Feedback Devices on Primary Care Patient Experience Scores: A Cluster-Randomized Trial. Journal of Patient Experience 2021;8 View
  4. Duncan R, Eden R, Woods L, Wong I, Sullivan C. Synthesizing Dimensions of Digital Maturity in Hospitals: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2022;24(3):e32994 View
  5. Jesus T, Stern B, Struhar J, Deutsch A, Heinemann A. The use of patient experience feedback in rehabilitation quality improvement and codesign activities: Scoping review of the literature. Clinical Rehabilitation 2023;37(2):261 View
  6. Jesus T, Struhar J, Zhang M, Lee D, Stern B, Heinemann A, Jordan N, Deutsch A. Near real-time patient experience feedback with data relay to providers: a systematic review of its effectiveness. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2024;36(2) View
  7. Struhar J, Walters T, Gracz K, Sheth M, Fernandez A, Lopez C, Jesus T. Implementing a real‐time patient experience feedback in inpatient rehabilitation: Process evaluation informed by the normalisation process theory. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management 2024;39(6):1737 View