Published on in Vol 20, No 6 (2018): June

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/9943, first published .
Home-Based Rehabilitation With Telemonitoring Guidance for Patients With Coronary Artery Disease (Short-Term Results of the TRiCH Study): Randomized Controlled Trial

Home-Based Rehabilitation With Telemonitoring Guidance for Patients With Coronary Artery Disease (Short-Term Results of the TRiCH Study): Randomized Controlled Trial

Home-Based Rehabilitation With Telemonitoring Guidance for Patients With Coronary Artery Disease (Short-Term Results of the TRiCH Study): Randomized Controlled Trial

Journals

  1. Avila A, Claes J, Buys R, Azzawi M, Vanhees L, Cornelissen V. Home-based exercise with telemonitoring guidance in patients with coronary artery disease: Does it improve long-term physical fitness?. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology 2020;27(4):367 View
  2. Batalik L, Filakova K, Batalikova K, Dosbaba F. Remotely monitored telerehabilitation for cardiac patients: A review of the current situation. World Journal of Clinical Cases 2020;8(10):1818 View
  3. Claes J, Cornelissen V, McDermott C, Moyna N, Pattyn N, Cornelis N, Gallagher A, McCormack C, Newton H, Gillain A, Budts W, Goetschalckx K, Woods C, Moran K, Buys R. PATHway-I: Feasibility, acceptability and clinical effectiveness of a technology enabled cardiac rehabilitation platform. A randomized controlled trial. (Preprint). Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019 View
  4. Lunde P, Bye A, Bergland A, Grimsmo J, Jarstad E, Nilsson B. Long-term follow-up with a smartphone application improves exercise capacity post cardiac rehabilitation: A randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology 2020;27(16):1782 View
  5. Angoulvant D, Bejan-Angoulvant T. The best in coronary artery disease management is yet to come. Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases 2018;111(11):621 View
  6. Peçanha T, Goessler K, Roschel H, Gualano B. Social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic can increase physical inactivity and the global burden of cardiovascular disease. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology 2020;318(6):H1441 View
  7. Halldorsdottir H, Thoroddsen A, Ingadottir B. Impact of technology-based patient education on modifiable cardiovascular risk factors of people with coronary heart disease: A systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling 2020;103(10):2018 View
  8. Hannan A, Harders M, Hing W, Climstein M, Coombes J, Furness J. Impact of wearable physical activity monitoring devices with exercise prescription or advice in the maintenance phase of cardiac rehabilitation: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation 2019;11(1) View
  9. Bubnova M. Relevant problems of participation and education of patients in cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention programs. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention 2020;19(6):2649 View
  10. Baťalík L. (Cardiovascular telerehabilitation: remotely monitored physical exercise). Cor et Vasa 2021;63(1):79 View
  11. Meinhart F, Stütz T, Sareban M, Kulnik S, Niebauer J. Mobile Technologies to Promote Physical Activity during Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review. Sensors 2020;21(1):65 View
  12. Evangelista F. Physical Exercise and the Renin Angiotensin System: Prospects in the COVID-19. Frontiers in Physiology 2020;11 View
  13. Aragaki D, Luo J, Weiner E, Zhang G, Darvish B. Cardiopulmonary Telerehabilitation. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America 2021;32(2):263 View
  14. Xu Y, Ye H, Zhu Y, Du S, Xu G, Wang Q. The efficacy of mobile health in alleviating risk factors related to the occurrence and development of coronary heart disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clinical Cardiology 2021;44(5):609 View
  15. Madigan C, Fong M, Howick J, Kettle V, Rouse P, Hamilton L, Roberts N, Gomersall S, Daley A. Effectiveness of interventions to maintain physical activity behavior (device‐measured): Systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obesity Reviews 2021;22(10) View
  16. Ashur C, Cascino T, Lewis C, Townsend W, Sen A, Pekmezi D, Richardson C, Jackson E. Do Wearable Activity Trackers Increase Physical Activity Among Cardiac Rehabilitation Participants? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention 2021;41(4):249 View
  17. Ghannem M, Boaouina M, Ghannem L. Quelle imagerie et quels outils pour une réadaptation cardiaque moderne ?. Annales de Cardiologie et d'Angéiologie 2022;71(6):428 View
  18. Thomas R, Petersen C, Olson T, Beatty A, Ding R, Supervia M. Asynchronous and Synchronous Delivery Models for Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention 2021;41(6):407 View
  19. Jafri S, Imran T, Medbury E, Ursillo J, Ahmad K, Imran H, Drwal K, Wu W. Cardiovascular Outcomes of Patients Referred to Home Based Cardiac Rehabilitation. Heart & Lung 2022;52:1 View
  20. Gass F, Halle M, Mueller S. Telemedicine acceptance and efficacy in the context of preventive cardiology interventions: A systematic review. DIGITAL HEALTH 2022;8:205520762211141 View
  21. KUM R, PEHLİVAN E. Farklı Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Alanlarında Telerehabilitasyon. Bandırma Onyedi Eylül Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri ve Araştırmaları Dergisi 2022;4(2):166 View
  22. Nacarato D, Sardeli A, Mariano L, Chacon-Mikahil M. Cardiovascular telerehabilitation improves functional capacity, cardiorespiratory fitness and quality of life in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2022:1357633X2211376 View
  23. Nso N, Nassar M, Mbome Y, Emmanuel K, Lyonga Ngonge A, Badejoko S, Akbar S, Landry I, Alfishawy M, Munira M, Rizzo V. Comparative Assessment of the Long-Term Efficacy of Home-Based Versus Center-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation. Cureus 2022 View
  24. Nikolov H, Hubbard J. A critical review of cardiac rehabilitation in a digital era. British Journal of Cardiac Nursing 2021;16(8):1 View
  25. Alam S, Zhang M, Harris K, Fletcher L, Reneker J. The Impact of Consumer Wearable Devices on Physical Activity and Adherence to Physical Activity in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Telemedicine and e-Health 2023;29(7):986 View
  26. Antoniou V, Davos C, Kapreli E, Batalik L, Panagiotakos D, Pepera G. Effectiveness of Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation, Using Wearable Sensors, as a Multicomponent, Cutting-Edge Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2022;11(13):3772 View
  27. Yu T, Xu H, Sui X, Zhang X, Pang Y, Yu T, Lian X, Zeng T, Wu Y, Leng X, Li F. Effectiveness of eHealth Interventions on Moderate-to-Vigorous Intensity Physical Activity Among Patients in Cardiac Rehabilitation: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e42845 View
  28. Falter M, Scherrenberg M, Kindermans H, Kizilkilic S, Kaihara T, Dendale P. Willingness to participate in cardiac telerehabilitation: results from semi-structured interviews. European Heart Journal - Digital Health 2022;3(1):67 View
  29. Brocki B, Andreasen J, Aaroe J, Andreasen J, Thorup C. Exercise-Based Real-time Telerehabilitation for Older Adult Patients Recently Discharged After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Mixed Methods Feasibility Study. JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies 2022;9(2):e34819 View
  30. Chong M, Sit J, Karthikesu K, Chair S. Effectiveness of technology-assisted cardiac rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2021;124:104087 View
  31. Máthéné Köteles É, Rafael B, Korom A, Vágvölgyi A, Ábrahám J, Domján A, Szűcs M, Nemes A, Barnai M, Lengyel C, Kósa I. Physiological and psychological effects of a 12-week home-based telemonitored training in metabolic syndrome. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 2023;9 View
  32. Lee K, Breznen B, Ukhova A, Koehler F, Martin S. Virtual healthcare solutions for cardiac rehabilitation: a literature review. European Heart Journal - Digital Health 2023;4(2):99 View
  33. McDonagh S, Dalal H, Moore S, Clark C, Dean S, Jolly K, Cowie A, Afzal J, Taylor R. Home-based versus centre-based cardiac rehabilitation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2023;2023(10) View
  34. Heimer M, Schmitz S, Teschler M, Schäfer H, Douma E, Habibovic M, Kop W, Meyer T, Mooren F, Schmitz B. eHealth for maintenance cardiovascular rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology 2023;30(15):1634 View
  35. McHale S, Neubeck L, Rowat A, Dawkes S, Hanson C. Understanding cardiac rehabilitation delivery in Scotland during the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons for the future. British Journal of Cardiac Nursing 2023;18(8):1 View
  36. Jacobsson R, Oikarinen A, Krogell J, Kankkunen P. Group-based cardiac telerehabilitation interventions and health outcomes in coronary patients: A scoping review. Clinical Rehabilitation 2024;38(2):184 View
  37. Sinkkonen E, Korpi H, Sjögren T. The added value of remote technology and the background factors explaining the changes in biopsychosocial functioning in cardiac rehabilitation: cluster randomised controlled trial. European Journal of Physiotherapy 2023:1 View
  38. Amiya E. Evidence of Efficacy in Cardiac Telerehabilitation. The Japanese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2023;60(4):320 View
  39. Racodon M, Vanhove P, Bolpaire R, Masson P, Porrovecchio A, Secq A. Is hybrid cardiac rehabilitation superior to traditional cardiac rehabilitation?. Acta Cardiologica 2023;78(7):773 View
  40. Puri S, Lalwani L. A Comparison Between Cardiac Telerehabilitation Program and Outpatient Hospital-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program for Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Surgery: A Review. Cureus 2023 View
  41. Jones A, Yan C, Rivera Rodriquez B, Kaur S, Andrade-Bucknor S, Abbadessa G. Role of wearable devices in cardiac telerehabilitation: A scoping review. PLOS ONE 2023;18(5):e0285801 View
  42. Spence C, Khoo N, Mackie A, Conway J, Rowland S, Foshaug R, Boulanger P, Spence J, Stickland M, Khoury M. Exploring the Promise of Telemedicine Exercise Interventions in Children and Adolescents With Congenital Heart Disease. Canadian Journal of Cardiology 2023;39(11):S346 View
  43. Zangger G, Bricca A, Liaghat B, Juhl C, Mortensen S, Andersen R, Damsted C, Hamborg T, Ried-Larsen M, Tang L, Thygesen L, Skou S. Benefits and Harms of Digital Health Interventions Promoting Physical Activity in People With Chronic Conditions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e46439 View
  44. Antoniou V, Kapreli E, Davos C, Batalik L, Pepera G. Safety and long-term outcomes of remote cardiac rehabilitation in coronary heart disease patients: A systematic review. DIGITAL HEALTH 2024;10 View
  45. Claes J, Kuznetsova T, Cauwenberghs N, Cornelissen V. The changing landscape of cardiac rehabilitation and the power of personalized therapy. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 2024;11 View
  46. Carrozzo A, Cornelissen V, Bathke A, Claes J, Niebauer J, Zimmermann G, Treff G, Kulnik S. Applying Exercise Capacity and Physical Activity as Single vs Composite Endpoints for Trials of Cardiac Rehabilitation Interventions: Rationale, Use-case, and a Blueprint Method for Sample Size Calculation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2024 View
  47. Gong X, Cheng J, Wu Y, He F, Wang S, Liu C, Zhu Y, Xu K. Effectiveness of home-based cardiac telerehabilitation based on wearable ECG or heart rate monitoring devices in patients with heart disease: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Geriatric Nursing 2024;58:238 View
  48. Pagliari C, Isernia S, Rapisarda L, Borgnis F, Lazzeroni D, Bini M, Geroldi S, Baglio F, Brambilla L. Different Models of Cardiac Telerehabilitation for People with Coronary Artery Disease: Features and Effectiveness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2024;13(12):3396 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Özden F, Uysal İ, Özkeskin M. The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Disability. View