Published on in Vol 20, No 5 (2018): May

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/9326, first published .
Reducing Negative Outcomes of Online Consumer Health Information: Qualitative Interpretive Study with Clinicians, Librarians, and Consumers

Reducing Negative Outcomes of Online Consumer Health Information: Qualitative Interpretive Study with Clinicians, Librarians, and Consumers

Reducing Negative Outcomes of Online Consumer Health Information: Qualitative Interpretive Study with Clinicians, Librarians, and Consumers

Journals

  1. Lai N, Khosa D, Jones-Bitton A, Dewey C. Students' Experiences of Seeking Web-Based Animal Health Information at the Ontario Veterinary College: Exploratory Qualitative Study. JMIR Medical Education 2019;5(2):e13795 View
  2. Zhu C, Zeng R, Zhang W, Evans R, He R. Pregnancy-Related Information Seeking and Sharing in the Social Media Era Among Expectant Mothers: Qualitative Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(12):e13694 View
  3. Carroll K, Noble-Carr D, Sweeney L, Waldby C. The “Lactation After Infant Death (AID) Framework”: A Guide for Online Health Information Provision About Lactation After Stillbirth and Infant Death. Journal of Human Lactation 2020;36(3):480 View
  4. Pluye P, El Sherif R, Gonzalez-Reyes A, Turcotte E, Schuster T, Bartlett G, Grad R, Granikov V, Barwick M, Doray G, Lagarde F, Loignon C. Outcomes of Equity-Oriented, Web-Based Parenting Information in Mothers of Low Socioeconomic Status Compared to Other Mothers: Participatory Mixed Methods Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(11):e22440 View
  5. Obamiro K, Lee K. Information overload in patients with atrial fibrillation: Can the cancer information overload (CIO) scale be used?. Patient Education and Counseling 2019;102(3):550 View
  6. Dai J, Granikov V, Sherif R, Grguric E, Turcotte E, Pluye P. Patient Information Aid: An innovative educational program to improve outcomes of online consumer health information. Education for Information 2019;35(1):41 View
  7. Sweeney L, Carroll K, Noble-Carr D, Waldby C. Lactation after infant death: an analysis of Australian healthcare agencies’ online health information. Health Sociology Review 2020;29(1):45 View
  8. Granikov V, Pluye P. Evaluating online health information sources using a mixed methods approach: Part 2. Education for Information 2019;35(1):3 View
  9. Pluye P, El Sherif R, Granikov V, Hong Q, Vedel I, Galvao M, Frati F, Desroches S, Repchinsky C, Rihoux B, Légaré F, Burnand B, Bujold M, Grad R. Health outcomes of online consumer health information: A systematic mixed studies review with framework synthesis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 2019;70(7):643 View
  10. Sjöström A, Hörnsten Å, Hajdarevic S, Emmoth A, Isaksson U. Primary Health Care Nurses’ Experiences of Consultations With Internet-Informed Patients: Qualitative Study. JMIR Nursing 2019;2(1):e14194 View
  11. Park K, Kim S, Lee Y, Chang H, Park C. Thyroid Cancer Patients’ Interests and Information Seeking Behavior: Focused on Online Community Analysis. International Journal of Thyroidology 2020;13(1):30 View
  12. FitzPatrick M, Hess A, Sudbury-Riley L, Schulz P. A Typology of Patients Based on Decision-Making Styles: Cross-Sectional Survey Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(11):e15332 View
  13. Seçkin G. Expansion of Parson's sick role into cyberspace: Patient information consumerism and subjective health in a representative sample of U.S. internet users. Social Science & Medicine 2020;247:112733 View
  14. Siddiqui E, Shah A, Sambol J, Waller A. Readability Assessment of Online Patient Education Materials on Atrial Fibrillation. Cureus 2020 View
  15. Alligood E. Partners for Patients: Hospital, Medical & Public Librarians—Health Care Allies. Journal of Hospital Librarianship 2019;19(2):165 View
  16. Hung L, Lyons J, Wu C. Health information technology use among older adults in the United States, 2009–2018. Current Medical Research and Opinion 2020;36(5):789 View
  17. Kogan L, Oxley J. Nurses' views of pet owners: online pet health information. The Veterinary Nurse 2020;11(8):379 View
  18. Seyed Hashemi S, Hosseinnezhad S, Dini S, Griffiths M, Lin C, Pakpour A. The mediating effect of the cyberchondria and anxiety sensitivity in the association between problematic internet use, metacognition beliefs, and fear of COVID-19 among Iranian online population. Heliyon 2020;6(10):e05135 View
  19. Miyachi K, Mackey T. hOCBS: A privacy-preserving blockchain framework for healthcare data leveraging an on-chain and off-chain system design. Information Processing & Management 2021;58(3):102535 View
  20. Glowacki E, Zhu Y, Bernhardt J, Magsamen-Conrad K. Technological capital within aging United States-based populations: challenges and recommendations for online intervention uptake. Journal of Applied Communication Research 2021;49(3):347 View
  21. Donelle L, Hall J, Hiebert B, Jackson K, Stoyanovich E, LaChance J, Facca D. Investigation of Digital Technology Use in the Transition to Parenting: Qualitative Study. JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting 2021;4(1):e25388 View
  22. Ng J, Zhang C, Ahmed S. Dietary and herbal supplements for fatigue: A quality assessment of online consumer health information. Integrative Medicine Research 2021;10(4):100749 View
  23. Avçin E, Can Ş. The relationship between the stress experienced by parents and cyberchondria during the pandemic process. Library Hi Tech 2022;40(2):548 View
  24. El Sherif R, Pluye P, Ibekwe F. Contexts and Outcomes of Proxy Online Health Information Seeking: Mixed Studies Review With Framework Synthesis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2022;24(6):e34345 View
  25. Schuster B, Britton H, Seo H, Altschwager D, Booton E, Ault M, Wickliffe J, Ramaswamy M. “I Don’t Just Take Whatever They Hand to Me”: How Women Recently Released from Incarceration Access Internet Health Information. Women & Criminal Justice 2024;34(5):306 View
  26. Safdari R, Gholamzadeh M, Saeedi S, Tanhapour M, Rezayi S. An evaluation of the quality of COVID‐19 websites in terms of HON principles and using DISCERN tool. Health Information & Libraries Journal 2023;40(4):371 View
  27. Shor J, Miyatani Y, Arita E, Chen P, Ito Y, Kayama H, Reiter J, Kobayashi K, Kobayashi T. Reducing Health Anxiety in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Using Video Testimonials: Pilot Assessment of a Video Intervention. JMIR Formative Research 2023;7:e39945 View
  28. El Sherif R, Pluye P, Schuster T, Grad R. Proxy Information Seeking by Users of a Parenting Information Website: Quantitative Observational Study. JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting 2022;5(1):e32406 View
  29. Linn A, van Weert J, Bylund C. Are They Important? Patients’ Communication Barriers to Discussing Online Health Information During Consultations. Health Communication 2024;39(5):945 View
  30. Zubiena L, Lewin O, Coleman R, Phezulu J, Ogunfiditimi G, Blackburn T, Joseph L. Development and testing of the health information website evaluation tool on neck pain websites – An analysis of reliability, validity, and utility. Patient Education and Counseling 2023;113:107762 View
  31. El Sherif R, Pluye P, Paquet V, Ibekwe F, Grad R. How People Use Web-Based Parenting Information to Support Others in Their Social Circle: Qualitative Descriptive Study. JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting 2023;6:e40043 View
  32. Ghouri A, Khan H, Mani V, Haq M, Lopes de Sousa Jabbour A. An Artificial-Intelligence-Based omnichannel blood supply chain: A pathway for sustainable development. Journal of Business Research 2023;164:113980 View
  33. Steffy C, Long B. PAUSE for Your Health: A New End-User Tool for Evaluating Consumer Health News and Online Resources. The Reference Librarian 2023;64(2-4):102 View
  34. Ng J, Popal S, Selvanayagam S. Dietary and herbal supplement consumer health information for pain: A cross-sectional survey and quality assessment of online content. Integrative Medicine Research 2023;12(4):100996 View
  35. Najjar L. Consumer Health Information on Public Library Websites: Availability and Characteristics. Medical Reference Services Quarterly 2023;42(4):315 View
  36. Ab Hamid M, Buhari S, Md Noor H, Azizan N, Md Nor N. Web-Based Nutrition and Physical Activity Education Intervention to Ameliorate Cardiometabolic Risks: A Single-Arm and Non-Randomized Feasibility Study. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health 2023;14 View
  37. El Sherif R, Pluye P, Hong Q, Rihoux B. Using qualitative comparative analysis as a mixed methods synthesis in systematic mixed studies reviews: Guidance and a worked example. Research Synthesis Methods 2024;15(3):450 View
  38. Taylor W, Cheng R, Weinblatt A, Bergstein V, Long W. An Artificial Intelligence Chatbot is an Accurate and Useful Online Patient Resource Prior to Total Knee Arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty 2024;39(8):S358 View
  39. Lu J, Dong Y, Zhang X, Wang Y, Zhou Z. The relationship between public risk preference and the underuse or overuse of preventive health services in the information age. Preventive Medicine Reports 2024;41:102727 View
  40. Hauber S, Robinson K, Fechner R, Pate J, O'Sullivan K. Credibility, readability and content analysis of treatment recommendations for adolescents with nonspecific back pain published on consumer websites. European Journal of Pain 2024;28(9):1571 View
  41. Goldberg I. Dr. Google will see you now: But will he make you sick?. Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology 2024;14(3):371 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Rissanen M. Health Information Science. View
  2. Yu P, Zhu Y, Halim U, Hailey D. Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging. View
  3. Yu P, Zhu Y, Halim U, Hailey D. Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging. View