This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Quality/Credibility of eHealth Information and Trust Issues (489) Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Medicine (197) Information Quality in Digital Media (318)

Published on in Vol 20, No 5 (2018): May

“It’s Totally Okay to Be Sad, but Never Lose Hope”: Content Analysis of Infertility-Related Videos on YouTube in Relation to Viewer Preferences

“It’s Totally Okay to Be Sad, but Never Lose Hope”: Content Analysis of Infertility-Related Videos on YouTube in Relation to Viewer Preferences

“It’s Totally Okay to Be Sad, but Never Lose Hope”: Content Analysis of Infertility-Related Videos on YouTube in Relation to Viewer Preferences

Authors of this article:

Margot Kelly-Hedrick1 Author Orcid Image ;   Paul H Grunberg2 Author Orcid Image ;   Felicia Brochu3 Author Orcid Image ;   Phyllis Zelkowitz1, 3, 4 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (27) Tweetations (15) Metrics

Journals

  1. Langford A, Loeb S. Perceived Patient-Provider Communication Quality and Sociodemographic Factors Associated With Watching Health-Related Videos on YouTube: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(5):e13512 View
  2. Kecojevic A, Meleo-Erwin Z, Basch C, Hammouda M. A Thematic Analysis of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) YouTube Videos. Journal of Homosexuality 2021;68(11):1877 View
  3. Ku S, Balasubramanian A, Yu J, Srivatsav A, Gondokusumo J, Tatem A, Beilan J, Hasan A, Hotaling J, Lipshultz L, Pastuszak A. A systematic evaluation of youtube as an information source for male infertility. International Journal of Impotence Research 2021;33(6):611 View
  4. Park E, Jones C, Forhan M. The use of digital storytelling as an approach to translating research knowledge: A scoping review (Preprint). Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020 View
  5. Mubin O, Cappuccio M, Alnajjar F, Ahmad M, Shahid S. Can a robot invigilator prevent cheating?. AI & SOCIETY 2020;35(4):981 View
  6. Loeb S, Taylor J, Borin J, Mihalcea R, Perez-Rosas V, Byrne N, Chiang A, Langford A. Fake News: Spread of Misinformation about Urological Conditions on Social Media. European Urology Focus 2020;6(3):437 View
  7. Gul M, Kaynar M. Comment on “A systematic evaluation of YouTube as an information source for male infertility”. International Journal of Impotence Research 2021;33(6):663 View
  8. Yokota R, Okuhara T, Ueno H, Okada H, Furukawa E, Kiuchi T. Online Japanese-Language Information on Lifestyle Factors Associated With Reduced Fertility: Content Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(8):e19777 View
  9. Copp T, Kvesic D, Lieberman D, Bateson D, McCaffery K. ‘Your hopes can run away with your realistic expectations’: a qualitative study of women and men’s decision-making when undergoing multiple cycles of IVF. Human Reproduction Open 2020;2020(4) View
  10. Warren C, Sawhney R, Shah T, Behbahani S, Sadeghi-Nejad H. YouTube and Men's Health: A Review of the Current Literature. Sexual Medicine Reviews 2021;9(2):280 View
  11. Cui L, Chu L. YouTube Videos Related to the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster: Content Analysis. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 2021;7(6):e26481 View
  12. Jung E, Kim S, De Luca V. Suicide on YouTube:Factors engaging viewers to a selection of suicide-themed videos. PLOS ONE 2021;16(6):e0252796 View
  13. Castillo L, Hadjistavropoulos T, Brachaniec M. The Effectiveness of Social Media in the Dissemination of Knowledge About Pain in Dementia. Pain Medicine 2021;22(11):2584 View
  14. Cheng J, Fernandez N, Shnorhavorian M, Merguerian P, Kieran K. Engagement of common pediatric urologic conditions on social media. Journal of Pediatric Urology 2022;18(2):236.e1 View
  15. Gupta A, Meriwether K, Petruska S, Fazenbaker-Crowell S, McKenzie C, Goble A, Stewart J. Viewer interaction with YouTube videos about hysterectomy recovery. WikiJournal of Medicine 2020;7(1) View
  16. Döring N, Conde M. Sexuelle Gesundheitsinformationen in sozialen Medien: Ein systematisches Scoping Review. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz 2021;64(11):1416 View
  17. Park E, Forhan M, Jones C. The use of digital storytelling of patients’ stories as an approach to translating knowledge: a scoping review. Research Involvement and Engagement 2021;7(1) View
  18. Birch E, Leziak K, Jackson J, Dahl E, Niznik C, Yee L. Content Quality of YouTube Videos About Gestational Diabetes: Systematic Evaluation. JMIR Diabetes 2022;7(2):e30156 View
  19. Yokota R, Okuhara T, Okada H, Furukawa E, Kiuchi T. Japanese Magazine Articles on Lifestyle Factors Associated with Fertility: A Content Analysis. Women 2023;3(3):408 View
  20. Fu J, Li C, Zhou C, Li W, Lai J, Deng S, Zhang Y, Guo Z, Wu Y. Methods for Analyzing the Contents of Social Media for Health Care: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e43349 View
  21. Pleasure Z, Becker A, Johnson D, Broussard K, Lindberg L. How TikTok is being used to talk about abortion post-Roe: A content analysis of the most liked abortion TikToks. Contraception 2024;133:110384 View
  22. Zou W, Tang L, Zhou M, Zhang X. Self-disclosure and received social support among women experiencing infertility on reddit: A natural language processing approach. Computers in Human Behavior 2024;154:108159 View
  23. Vardell E, Wang T, Linares B. Infertility Consumer Health Information and Resources. Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet 2024;28(1):63 View
  24. Zhang Y, Fu J, Lai J, Deng S, Guo Z, Zhong C, Tang J, Cao W, Wu Y. Reporting of Ethical Considerations in Qualitative Research Utilizing Social Media Data on Public Health Care: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e51496 View
  25. van Dijk M, van der Marel A, van Rheenen-Flach L, Ganzevoort W, Moll E, Scheele F, Velzel J. YouTube as a Source of Patient Information on External Cephalic Version: Cross-Sectional Study. JMIR Formative Research 2024;8:e50087 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Hammarberg K, Schmidt L, Malling G, Koert E. Patient-Centered Assisted Reproduction. View