This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Research Instruments, Questionnaires, and Tools (541) Personal Health Records, Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Records, Patient Portals (542) Methods and Instruments in Medical Informatics (104)

Published on in Vol 19, No 10 (2017): October

Psychometric Properties of Patient-Facing eHealth Evaluation Measures: Systematic Review and Analysis

Psychometric Properties of Patient-Facing eHealth Evaluation Measures: Systematic Review and Analysis

Psychometric Properties of Patient-Facing eHealth Evaluation Measures: Systematic Review and Analysis

Authors of this article:

Bonnie J Wakefield1 Author Orcid Image ;   Carolyn L Turvey1 Author Orcid Image ;   Kim M Nazi2 Author Orcid Image ;   John E Holman1 Author Orcid Image ;   Timothy P Hogan3 Author Orcid Image ;   Stephanie L Shimada3 Author Orcid Image ;   Diana R Kennedy4 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (20) Tweetations (6) Metrics

Journals

  1. Van den Bulck S, Hermens R, Slegers K, Vandenberghe B, Goderis G, Vankrunkelsven P. Designing a Patient Portal for Patient-Centered Care: Cross-Sectional Survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(10):e269 View
  2. Glattacker M, Boeker M, Anger R, Reichenbach F, Tassoni A, Bredenkamp R, Giesler J. Evaluation of a Mobile Phone App for Patients With Pollen-Related Allergic Rhinitis: Prospective Longitudinal Field Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(4):e15514 View
  3. Anderberg P, Eivazzadeh S, Berglund J. A Novel Instrument for Measuring Older People’s Attitudes Toward Technology (TechPH): Development and Validation. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(5):e13951 View
  4. Chattopadhyay D, Ma T, Sharifi H, Martyn-Nemeth P. Computer-Controlled Virtual Humans in Patient-Facing Systems: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(7):e18839 View
  5. Kayser L, Rossen S, Karnoe A, Elsworth G, Vibe-Petersen J, Christensen J, Ried-Larsen M, Osborne R. Development of the Multidimensional Readiness and Enablement Index for Health Technology (READHY) Tool to Measure Individuals’ Health Technology Readiness: Initial Testing in a Cancer Rehabilitation Setting. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(2):e10377 View
  6. Mitchell K, Holtz B, McCarroll A. Patient-Centered Methods for Designing and Developing Health Information Communication Technologies: A Systematic Review. Telemedicine and e-Health 2019;25(11):1012 View
  7. Schellong J, Lorenz P, Weidner K. Proposing a standardized, step-by-step model for creating post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) related mobile mental health apps in a framework based on technical and medical norms. European Journal of Psychotraumatology 2019;10(1) View
  8. Tam W, Woo B, Lim T. Questionnaires Designed to Assess Knowledge of Atrial Fibrillation. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing 2019;34(3):E14 View
  9. Bhandari N, Payakachat N, Fletcher D, Sung Y, Eswaran H, Benton T, Lowery C. Validation of Newly Developed Surveys to Evaluate Patients' and Providers' Satisfaction with Telehealth Obstetric Services. Telemedicine and e-Health 2020;26(7):879 View
  10. Smith N, Burton-Jones A, Sullivan C. From benefits idealisation to value optimisation: application in the digital health context. Australian Health Review 2020;44(5):706 View
  11. Pérez-Alfonso K, Sánchez-Martínez V. Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Evaluating Cancer Symptoms: A Systematic Review. Seminars in Oncology Nursing 2021;37(2):151145 View
  12. McMaughan D, Lin S, Ozmetin J, Beverly J, Brog J, Naiser E. A Provider-Facing eHealth Tool for Transitioning Youth With Special Health Care Needs From Pediatric to Adult Care: Mixed Methods, User-Engaged Usability Study. JMIR Formative Research 2021;5(5):e22915 View
  13. van der Windt M, van Zundert S, Schoenmakers S, van Rossem L, Steegers-Theunissen R. Prototyping of a Digital Life Course Care Platform for Preconception and Pregnancy Care: Pilot Feasibility and Acceptability Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e37537 View
  14. Nievas-Soriano B, García-Duarte S, Fernández-Alonso A, Bonillo-Perales A, Parrón-Carreño T. Users evaluation of a Spanish eHealth pediatric website. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2021;212:106462 View
  15. Goldsack J, Dowling A, Samuelson D, Patrick-Lake B, Clay I. Evaluation, Acceptance, and Qualification of Digital Measures: From Proof of Concept to Endpoint. Digital Biomarkers 2021;5(1):53 View
  16. Burrell A, Zrubka Z, Champion A, Zah V, Vinuesa L, Holtorf A, Di Bidino R, Earla J, Entwistle J, Boltyenkov A, Braileanu G, Kolasa K, Roydhouse J, Asche C, Redekop K, Pfeiffer C, Le L, Janodia M, Sharkawy M, Şaylan M, Lee S, Glynn S, Ganguli A, Badawy S, Carvalho L, Ernst F, Seal B, van Steen C, Patel N, Lee H, Doe A, Strouss L, Angelillo L, Patel C, Paul S. How Useful Are Digital Health Terms for Outcomes Research? An ISPOR Special Interest Group Report. Value in Health 2022;25(9):1469 View
  17. Magalhães B, Fernandes C, Santos C, Martínez-Galiano J. The Use of Mobile Applications for Managing Care Processes During Chemotherapy Treatments: A Systematic Review. Cancer Nursing 2021;44(6):E339 View
  18. Lafave L. Is the online ‘creating healthy eating and active environments survey' (CHEERS) tool reliable for early childhood educators in Alberta, Canada: a randomized crossover trial. Archives of Public Health 2023;81(1) View
  19. Сорока І. НАУКОВЕ ОБҐРУНТУВАННЯ ОПТИМІЗАЦІЇ ВИКОРИСТАННЯ ЕЛЕКТРОННИХ ТЕХНОЛОГІЙ В УМОВАХ РОЗВИТКУ ЕЛЕКТРОННОЇ СИСТЕМИ ОХОРОНИ ЗДОРОВ’Я. Вісник соціальної гігієни та організації охорони здоров'я України 2023;(2):119 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Escudero C. Digital Services in Crisis, Disaster, and Emergency Situations. View