This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Crowdsourcing and Mechanical Turks (91) Research Priorities Setting (22) Back Pain (103)

Published on in Vol 19, No 10 (2017): October

The Promise and Pitfalls of Using Crowdsourcing in Research Prioritization for Back Pain: Cross-Sectional Surveys

The Promise and Pitfalls of Using Crowdsourcing in Research Prioritization for Back Pain: Cross-Sectional Surveys

The Promise and Pitfalls of Using Crowdsourcing in Research Prioritization for Back Pain: Cross-Sectional Surveys

Authors of this article:

Matthew A Bartek1 Author Orcid Image ;   Anjali R Truitt1 Author Orcid Image ;   Sierra Widmer-Rodriguez1 Author Orcid Image ;   Jordan Tuia1 Author Orcid Image ;   Zoya A Bauer2 Author Orcid Image ;   Bryan A Comstock3 Author Orcid Image ;   Todd C Edwards4 Author Orcid Image ;   Sarah O Lawrence1 Author Orcid Image ;   Sarah E Monsell3 Author Orcid Image ;   Donald L Patrick4 Author Orcid Image ;   Jeffrey G Jarvik2 Author Orcid Image ;   Danielle C Lavallee1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (13) Tweetations (23) Metrics

Journals

  1. Lewinson R, Katz J. Influencing Pain Inferences Using Random Numerical Anchoring: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Human Factors 2020;7(1):e17533 View
  2. Hilton L, Azzam T. Crowdsourcing Qualitative Thematic Analysis. American Journal of Evaluation 2019;40(4):575 View
  3. Monu J, Triplette M, Wood D, Wolff E, Lavallee D, Flum D, Farjah F. Evaluating Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs About Lung Cancer Screening Using Crowdsourcing. Chest 2020;158(1):386 View
  4. Créquit P, Mansouri G, Benchoufi M, Vivot A, Ravaud P. Mapping of Crowdsourcing in Health: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(5):e187 View
  5. Mastboom M, Planje R, van de Sande M. The Patient Perspective on the Impact of Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumors on Daily Living: Crowdsourcing Study on Physical Function and Quality of Life. Interactive Journal of Medical Research 2018;7(1):e4 View
  6. Lavallee D, Lawrence S, Avins A, Nerenz D, Edwards T, Patrick D, Bauer Z, Truitt A, Monsell S, Scott M, Jarvik J. Comparing three approaches for involving patients in research prioritization: a qualitative study of participant experiences. Research Involvement and Engagement 2020;6(1) View
  7. Zhu B, Leon W, Paul L, Gao P. Impact of Crowdsourcee’s Vertical Fairness Concern on the Crowdsourcing Knowledge Sharing Behavior and Its Incentive Mechanism. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity 2021;34(3):1102 View
  8. Bababekov Y, Stapleton S, Hashimoto D, Witkowski E, Haynes A, Goldstein A, Mullen J, Isselbacher E, Lillemoe K, Chang D. Open innovation facilitates department-wide engagement in quality improvement: experience from the Massachusetts General Hospital. Surgical Endoscopy 2021;35(10):5441 View
  9. Santos C, Baldi A, de Assis Neto F, Barcellos M. Essential elements, conceptual foundations and workflow design in crowd-powered projects. Journal of Information Science 2023;49(6):1546 View
  10. Abdelhamid M. Fitness Tracker Information and Privacy Management: Empirical Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(11):e23059 View
  11. Menendez M, Pagani N, Puzzitiello R, Moverman M, Sudah S, Namdari S, Jawa A. Strong Public Desire for Quality and Price Transparency in Shoulder Arthroplasty. Cureus 2022 View
  12. Maddah M, Esmaeilzadeh P, Mirzaei T. An Experimental Study to Examine Relationships Between IT Identity and Users’ Post-Adoption Behaviors for Different Types of Health Applications. Information Systems Management 2024;41(3):238 View
  13. Chen K, Lang Y, Zhou Y, Kosmari L, Daniel K, Gurses A, Xiao Y. Assessing Interventions on Crowdsourcing Platforms to Nudge Patients for Engagement Behaviors in Primary Care Settings: Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e41431 View