Patient Information Websites About Medically Induced Second-Trimester Abortions: A Descriptive Study of Quality, Suitability, and Issues

Journals

1. Carlsson T, Melander Marttala U, Wadensten B, Bergman G, Axelsson O, Mattsson E. Quality of Patient Information Websites About Congenital Heart Defects: Mixed-Methods Study of Perspectives Among Individuals With Experience of a Prenatal Diagnosis. Interactive Journal of Medical Research 2017;6(2):e15 View
2. Westrate L, Brennan S, Carmany E. Assessing the availability and quality of Spanish‐language genetic resources for patients on the internet. Journal of Genetic Counseling 2020;29(3):381 View
3. Georgsson S, Krautmeyer S, Sundqvist E, Carlsson T. Abortion-related worries, fears and preparedness: a Swedish Web-based exploratory and retrospective qualitative study. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 2019;24(5):380 View
4. Raptis D, Sinanyan M, Ghani S, Soggiu F, Gilliland J, Imber C. Quality assessment of patient information on the management of gallstone disease in the internet – A systematic analysis using the modified ensuring quality information for patients tool. HPB 2019;21(12):1632 View
5. Li Y, Zhou X, Zhou Y, Mao F, Shen S, Lin Y, Zhang X, Chang T, Sun Q. Evaluation of the quality and readability of online information about breast cancer in China. Patient Education and Counseling 2021;104(4):858 View
6. Georgsson S, van der Spoel L, Ferm J, Carlsson T. Quality of web pages about second‐trimester medical abortion: A cross‐sectional study of readability, comprehensiveness, and transparency. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2019;75(11):2683 View
7. Georgsson S, Carlsson T. Readability of web-based sources about induced abortion: a cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2020;20(1) View
8. Eriksson C, Skinstad M, Georgsson S, Carlsson T. Quality of websites about long-acting reversible contraception: a descriptive cross-sectional study. Reproductive Health 2019;16(1) View
9. Han L, Boniface E, Han L, Albright J, Doty N, Darney B. The Abortion Web Ecosystem: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Trustworthiness and Bias. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(10):e20619 View
10. Masella M, Godard B. Enjeux éthiques du recours à Internet par les femmes enceintes dans leur suivi de grossesse. Santé Publique 2020;Vol. 32(2):171 View
11. Narvaez-Rojas A, Arnaout M, Hoz S, Agrawal A, Lee A, Moscote-Salazar L, Deora H. Info-pollution: a word of caution for the neurosurgical community. Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery 2022;37(1) View
12. Peter M, McInnes‐Dean H, Fisher J, Tapon D, Chitty L, Hill M. What's out there for parents? A systematic review of online information about prenatal microarray and exome sequencing. Prenatal Diagnosis 2022;42(1):97 View
13. Marcus E, Latos-Bielenska A, Jamry-Dziurla A, Barišić I, Cavero-Carbonell C, Den Hond E, Garne E, Genard L, Santos A, Lutke L, Matias Dias C, Neergaard Pedersen C, Neville A, Niemann A, Odak L, Pierini A, Rico J, Rissmann A, Rankin J, Morris J. Information needs of parents of children with congenital anomalies across Europe: a EUROlinkCAT survey. BMC Pediatrics 2022;22(1) View
14. Shan Y, Xing Z, Dong Z, Ji M, Wang D, Cao X. Translating and Adapting the DISCERN Instrument Into a Simplified Chinese Version and Validating Its Reliability: Development and Usability Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e40733 View
15. Annesi T, Steinway C, Oluwole T, Shilly S, Szalda D, Myers R, Chen J, Jan S. Quality of Web-Based Sickle Cell Disease Resources for Health Care Transition: Website Content Analysis. JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting 2023;6:e48924 View
16. Marcasciano M, Vittori E, Ciriaco A, Torto F, Giannaccare G, Scorcia V, D’Alcontres F, Chang C, Colica C, Greco M. A Systematic Quality Assessment of Online Resources on Eyelid Ptosis Using the Modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (mEQIP) Tool. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2024;48(9):1688 View

Books/Policy Documents

1. . Dealing With Change Through Information Sculpting. View