Published on in Vol 19, No 1 (2017): January

Toward Patient-Centered Telerehabilitation Design: Understanding Chronic Pain Patients’ Preferences for Web-Based Exercise Telerehabilitation Using a Discrete Choice Experiment

Toward Patient-Centered Telerehabilitation Design: Understanding Chronic Pain Patients’ Preferences for Web-Based Exercise Telerehabilitation Using a Discrete Choice Experiment

Toward Patient-Centered Telerehabilitation Design: Understanding Chronic Pain Patients’ Preferences for Web-Based Exercise Telerehabilitation Using a Discrete Choice Experiment

Journals

  1. Kinder J, Davenport T, Chong W. Lee A. Telerehabilitation for Treating Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: A Case Series of 3 Patients' Experiences. Journal of Women's Health Physical Therapy 2019;43(1):44 View
  2. Ledel Solem I, Varsi C, Eide H, Kristjansdottir O, Mirkovic J, Børøsund E, Haaland-Øverby M, Heldal K, Schreurs K, Waxenberg L, Weiss K, Morrison E, Solberg Nes L. Patients’ Needs and Requirements for eHealth Pain Management Interventions: Qualitative Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(4):e13205 View
  3. Schramm K, Grassl N, Nees J, Hoffmann J, Stepan H, Bruckner T, Haun M, Maatouk I, Haist M, Schott T, Sohn C, Schott S. Women’s Attitudes Toward Self-Monitoring of Their Pregnancy Using Noninvasive Electronic Devices: Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2019;7(1):e11458 View
  4. Featherall J, Lapin B, Chaitoff A, Havele S, Thompson N, Katzan I. Characterization of Patient Interest in Provider-Based Consumer Health Information Technology: Survey Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(4):e128 View
  5. Reese C, Nechwatal R, Farin E. Welche Erwartungen haben Rehabilitanden an eine telemedizinische kardiologische Reha-Nachsorge? Ergebnisse aus Interviews mit Rehabilitanden. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen 2019;143:43 View
  6. Nittas V, Mütsch M, Puhan M. Preferences for Sun Protection With a Self-Monitoring App: Protocol of a Discrete Choice Experiment Study. JMIR Research Protocols 2020;9(2):e16087 View
  7. Soekhai V, de Bekker-Grob E, Ellis A, Vass C. Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future. PharmacoEconomics 2019;37(2):201 View
  8. Galea M. Telemedicine in Rehabilitation. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America 2019;30(2):473 View
  9. Spindler H, Leerskov K, Joensson K, Nielsen G, Andreasen J, Dinesen B. Conventional Rehabilitation Therapy Versus Telerehabilitation in Cardiac Patients: A Comparison of Motivation, Psychological Distress, and Quality of Life. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2019;16(3):512 View
  10. Ledel Solem I, Varsi C, Eide H, Kristjansdottir O, Børøsund E, Schreurs K, Waxenberg L, Weiss K, Morrison E, Haaland-Øverby M, Bevan K, Zangi H, Stubhaug A, Solberg Nes L. A User-Centered Approach to an Evidence-Based Electronic Health Pain Management Intervention for People With Chronic Pain: Design and Development of EPIO. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(1):e15889 View
  11. Vaish H. Letter to the Editor: Tele-rehabilitation of Back Pain Patients in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic. Asian Spine Journal 2020;14(4):590 View
  12. Silva B, Lira F, Rossi F, Ramos D, Uzeloto J, Freire A, Lima F, Gobbo L, Ramos E. Inflammatory and Metabolic Responses to Different Resistance Training on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Control Trial. Frontiers in Physiology 2018;9 View
  13. Iqbal M. Telemedicine: An Innovative Twist to Primary Health Care in Rural Bangladesh. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health 2020;11 View
  14. Assenza C, Catania H, Antenore C, Gobbetti T, Gentili P, Paolucci S, Morelli D. Continuity of Care During COVID-19 Lockdown: A Survey on Stakeholders' Experience With Telerehabilitation. Frontiers in Neurology 2021;11 View
  15. Busso C, Castorina G, Di Monaco M, Rodriguez D, Mahdavi H, Balocco S, Trucco M, Conti M, Castagna A, Minetto M. Effectiveness of a home-based telerehabilitation system in patients after total hip arthroplasty: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2020;21(1) View
  16. Capecci M, Ciabattoni L, Ferracuti F, Monteriù A, Romeo L, Verdini F. Collaborative design of a telerehabilitation system enabling virtual second opinion based on fuzzy logic. IET Computer Vision 2018;12(4):502 View
  17. Hayes D. Telerehabilitation for Older Adults. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation 2020;36(4):205 View
  18. Graber J, Lockhart S, Matlock D, Stevens‐Lapsley J, Kittelson A. “This is not negotiable. You need to do this…”: A directed content analysis of decision making in rehabilitation after knee arthroplasty. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2022;28(1):99 View
  19. Snoswell C, Smith A, Page M, Caffery L. Patient preferences for specialist outpatient video consultations: A discrete choice experiment. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2023;29(9):707 View
  20. Chapel B, Alexandre F, Heraud N, Ologeanu-Taddei R, Cases A, Bughin F, Hayot M. Standardization of the assessment process within telerehabilitation in chronic diseases: a scoping meta-review. BMC Health Services Research 2022;22(1) View
  21. Moulaei K, Sheikhtaheri A, Nezhad M, Haghdoost A, Gheysari M, Bahaadinbeigy K. Telerehabilitation for upper limb disabilities: a scoping review on functions, outcomes, and evaluation methods. Archives of Public Health 2022;80(1) View
  22. Kaloty K, Rudecki J, Craine V, Moyes A, Armstrong R, Baxter M, Hunter J, Mustafa N, Grant G, Vader K, Bosma R. Virtual care exercise interventions in multidisciplinary chronic pain clinics: a qualitative study of perspectives of adults living with chronic pain. Disability and Rehabilitation 2023;45(18):2976 View
  23. Grigorovich A, Xi M, Lam N, Pakosh M, Chan B. A systematic review of economic analyses of home-based telerehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation 2022;44(26):8188 View
  24. Franchini M, Salvatori M, Denoth F, Molinaro S, Pieroni S. Participation in Low Back Pain Management: It Is Time for the To-Be Scenarios in Digital Public Health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022;19(13):7805 View
  25. Burgos-Mansilla B, Galiano-Castillo N, Lozano-Lozano M, Fernández-Lao C, Lopez-Garzon M, Arroyo-Morales M. Effect of Physical Therapy Modalities on Quality of Life of Head and Neck Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2021;10(20):4696 View
  26. Paul S, Hubbard A, Johnson J, Dennis S, Raghuveer P. Transition to a virtual model of physiotherapy and exercise physiology in response to COVID-19 for people in a rural Australia: Is it a viable solution to increase access to allied health for rural populations?. PLOS ONE 2023;18(1):e0280876 View
  27. Areias A, Costa F, Janela D, Molinos M, Moulder R, Lains J, Scheer J, Bento V, Yanamadala V, Cohen S, Correia F. Impact on productivity impairment of a digital care program for chronic low back pain: A prospective longitudinal cohort study. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice 2023;63:102709 View
  28. Wathne H, Morken I, Storm M, Husebø A. Designing a Future eHealth Service for Posthospitalization Self-management Support in Long-term Illness: Qualitative Interview Study. JMIR Human Factors 2023;10:e39391 View
  29. Kelly M, Fullen B, Martin D, McMahon S, McVeigh J. eHealth Interventions to Support Self-Management in People With Musculoskeletal Disorders, “eHealth: It’s TIME”—A Scoping Review. Physical Therapy 2022;102(4) View
  30. Zhu M, Dong D, Lo H, Wong S, Mo P, Sit R. Patient preferences in the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review of discrete choice experiments. Pain 2023;164(4):675 View
  31. Hensen B, Winkelmann C, Wacker F, Vogt B, Dewald C, Neumann T. Identification of Relevant Attributes for Liver Cancer Therapies (IRALCT): a maximum-difference-scaling analysis. Scientific Reports 2022;12(1) View
  32. Knoerl R, Berry D, Meyerhardt J, Reyes K, Salehi E, Thornton K, Gewandter J. Identifying participants’ preferences for modifiable chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy prevention clinical trial factors: an adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis. Supportive Care in Cancer 2022;30(12):9963 View
  33. Stoppok P, Frewer A, Schweda A, Geiger S, Skoda E, Müßgens D, Bingel U, Teufel M, Bäuerle A. Needs and Demands for eHealth Pain Management Interventions in Chronic Pain Patients. Journal of Personalized Medicine 2023;13(4):675 View
  34. Albers R, Lemke S, Knapp S, Krischak G, Bethge M. Non-inferiority of a hybrid outpatient rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial (HIRE, DRKS00028770). BMC Digital Health 2023;1(1) View
  35. Rossetto F, Borgnis F, Isernia S, Foglia E, Garagiola E, Realdon O, Baglio F. System Integrated Digital Empowering and teleRehabilitation to promote patient Activation and well-Being in chronic disabilities: A usability and acceptability study. Frontiers in Public Health 2023;11 View
  36. Suero-Pineda A, Oliva-Pascual-Vaca Á, Durán M, Sánchez-Laulhé P, García-Frasquet M, Blanquero J. Effectiveness of a telerehabilitation tablet app in combination with face-to-face physiotherapy for people with wrist, hand or finger injuries: A pragmatic multicentre clinical trial. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2023 View
  37. Puri S, Lalwani L. A Comparison Between Cardiac Telerehabilitation Program and Outpatient Hospital-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program for Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Surgery: A Review. Cureus 2023 View
  38. Ader L, Schick A, Löffler M, Löffler A, Beiner E, Eich W, Vock S, Sirazitdinov A, Malone C, Hesser J, Hopp M, Ruckes C, Flor H, Tesarz J, Reininghaus U. Refocusing of Attention on Positive Events Using Monitoring-Based Feedback and Microinterventions for Patients With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain in the PerPAIN Randomized Controlled Trial: Protocol for a Microrandomized Trial. JMIR Research Protocols 2023;12:e43376 View
  39. Barry Walsh C, Cahalan R, Hinman R, O’Sullivan K. Exploring attitudes of people with chronic health conditions towards the use of group-based telerehabilitation: A qualitative study. Clinical Rehabilitation 2024;38(1):130 View
  40. Han H, Park S, Kim D, Lee B, Kim D, Jeon N, Yang Y. E-Health Interventions for Older Adults With Frailty: A Systematic Review. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine 2023;47(5):348 View
  41. Hellstén T, Arokoski J, Sjögren T, Jäppinen A, Kettunen J. Remote physiotherapy in Finland—suitability, usability and factors affecting its use. European Journal of Physiotherapy 2023;25(6):378 View
  42. Cui D, Janela D, Costa F, Molinos M, Areias A, Moulder R, Scheer J, Bento V, Cohen S, Yanamadala V, Correia F. Randomized-controlled trial assessing a digital care program versus conventional physiotherapy for chronic low back pain. npj Digital Medicine 2023;6(1) View
  43. Madanian S, Nakarada-Kordic I, Reay S, Chetty T. Patients' perspectives on digital health tools. PEC Innovation 2023;2:100171 View
  44. Pak S, Janela D, Freitas N, Costa F, Moulder R, Molinos M, Areias A, Bento V, Cohen S, Yanamadala V, Souza R, Correia F. Comparing Digital to Conventional Physical Therapy for Chronic Shoulder Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e49236 View
  45. Areias A, Janela D, Molinos M, Moulder R, Bento V, Yanamadala V, Cohen S, Correia F, Costa F. Managing Musculoskeletal Pain in Older Adults Through a Digital Care Solution: Secondary Analysis of a Prospective Clinical Study. JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies 2023;10:e49673 View
  46. Bhardwaj A, Barry Walsh C, Ezzat A, O’Riordan C, Kennedy N, Toomey C. Patient and clinician perspectives of online-delivered exercise programmes for chronic musculoskeletal conditions: a mixed-methods systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation 2024;46(11):2196 View
  47. Vo L, Allen M, Cunich M, Thillainadesan J, McPhail S, Sharma P, Wallis S, McGowan K, Carter H. Stakeholders’ preferences for the design and delivery of virtual care services: A systematic review of discrete choice experiments. Social Science & Medicine 2024;340:116459 View
  48. Chen N, Bai D, Lv N. Towards an Integrated Online–Offline Healthcare System: Exploring Chinese Patients’ Preferences for Outpatient Follow-Up Visits Using a Discrete Choice Experiment. Systems 2024;12(3):75 View
  49. Harnik M, Scheidegger A, Blättler L, Nemecek Z, Sauter T, Limacher A, Reisig F, grosse Holtforth M, Streitberger K. Acceptance, Satisfaction, and Preference With Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2021-2022: Survey Among Patients With Chronic Pain. JMIR Formative Research 2024;8:e53154 View
  50. Porta X, Nieto R, Serrat M, Bourdin Kreitz P. Perception of People Diagnosed With Fibromyalgia About Information and Communication Technologies for Chronic Pain Management: Cross-Sectional Survey Study. JMIR Formative Research 2024;8:e55751 View
  51. Talay L, Vickers M, Wu S. Patient Satisfaction with an Australian Digital Weight-Loss Service: A Comparative Retrospective Analysis. Telemedicine Reports 2024;5(1):181 View
  52. Song F, Gong X, Guo R. Investigating the Relationship Between Patient-Centered Communication and Quality of E-Consult in China: A Cross-Sectional Standardized Patient Study. Health Communication 2024:1 View
  53. Martin S, Kihlbom U, Pasquini G, Gerli F, Niccolai C, Della Bella S, Portaccio E, Betti M, Amato M, Achiron A, Kalron A, Aloni R, Schölin Bywall K. Preferences and attitudes regarding early intervention in multiple sclerosis: A systematic literature review. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders 2024;92:106143 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Christensen B, Knoche H, Dinesen B. Interactivity, Game Creation, Design, Learning, and Innovation. View
  2. . TeleStroke. View
  3. Kurz J, Hussey D. Telerehabilitation. View
  4. Tümtürk İ, Bakırhan S. Telerehabilitation. View