This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Peer-to-Peer Support and Online Communities (636)

Published on in Vol 18, No 3 (2016): March

The Impact of Personality Factors and Preceding User Comments on the Processing of Research Findings on Deep Brain Stimulation: A Randomized Controlled Experiment in a Simulated Online Forum

The Impact of Personality Factors and Preceding User Comments on the Processing of Research Findings on Deep Brain Stimulation: A Randomized Controlled Experiment in a Simulated Online Forum

The Impact of Personality Factors and Preceding User Comments on the Processing of Research Findings on Deep Brain Stimulation: A Randomized Controlled Experiment in a Simulated Online Forum

Authors of this article:

Insa Feinkohl1 Author Orcid Image ;   Danny Flemming2 Author Orcid Image ;   Ulrike Cress2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Joachim Kimmerle1, 3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (11) Tweetations (4) Metrics

Journals

  1. Beenen P, Filiputti D, Meyer E, Carballo Costa L, Ophey M, Almeida P, van Wijchen J, Katajapuu N, Brear A, Castro Caldas A. Epistemological beliefs of European physiotherapists – a multi-countrycross-cultural adaptation for the DEBQ and the CAEB questionnaires. European Journal of Physiotherapy 2017;19(1):32 View
  2. Kaufman M, Dey D, Crainiceanu C, Dredze M. #MeToo and Google Inquiries Into Sexual Violence: A Hashtag Campaign Can Sustain Information Seeking. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 2021;36(19-20):9857 View
  3. Flemming D, Cress U, Kimmerle J. Processing the Scientific Tentativeness of Medical Research: An Experimental Study on the Effects of Research News and User Comments in Online Media. Science Communication 2017;39(6):745 View
  4. Flemming D, Kimmerle J, Cress U, Sinatra G. Research is Tentative, but That’s Okay: Overcoming Misconceptions about Scientific Tentativeness through Refutation Texts. Discourse Processes 2020;57(1):17 View
  5. König L, Jucks R. Influence of Enthusiastic Language on the Credibility of Health Information and the Trustworthiness of Science Communicators: Insights From a Between-Subject Web-Based Experiment. Interactive Journal of Medical Research 2019;8(3):e13619 View
  6. Kimmerle J, Bientzle M, Cress U. “Scientific evidence is very important for me”: The impact of behavioral intention and the wording of user inquiries on replies and recommendations in a health-related online forum. Computers in Human Behavior 2017;73:320 View
  7. Schindler M, Domahidi E. The growing field of interdisciplinary research on user comments: A computational scoping review. New Media & Society 2021;23(8):2474 View
  8. El Benny M, Kabakian-Khasholian T, El-Jardali F, Bardus M. Application of the eHealth Literacy Model in Digital Health Interventions: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(6):e23473 View
  9. Haneef R, Yavchitz A, Ravaud P, Baron G, Oranksy I, Schwitzer G, Boutron I. Interpretation of health news items reported with or without spin: protocol for a prospective meta-analysis of 16 randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open 2017;7(11):e017425 View
  10. Allsop Y. Setting the Social Media Stage, a Narrative Review: The Role of Theory and Research in Understanding Adolescent Online Sexual Health Information-Seeking. Sexes 2024;5(4):544 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Kimmerle J, Bientzle M, Cress U, Flemming D, Greving H, Grapendorf J, Sassenrath C, Sassenberg K. Informational Environments. View