Published on in Vol 18, No 11 (2016): November

This is a member publication of UC Davis - Shields Library, Davis, CA, USA

Using Interactive Patient Engagement Technology in Clinical Practice: A Qualitative Assessment of Nurses’ Perceptions

Using Interactive Patient Engagement Technology in Clinical Practice: A Qualitative Assessment of Nurses’ Perceptions

Using Interactive Patient Engagement Technology in Clinical Practice: A Qualitative Assessment of Nurses’ Perceptions

Journals

  1. Tiase V, Hull S, Troseth M, Schnall R. Development and psychometric testing of the Readiness to Engage with Patient-Facing Health Information Technology Tools (RE-PHIT) scale. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2018;118:1 View
  2. Sun S, Hwang H, Dutta B, Peng M. Exploring critical factors influencing nurses’ intention to use tablet PC in Patients’ care using an integrated theoretical model. Libyan Journal of Medicine 2019;14(1) View
  3. Anderberg P, Björling G, Stjernberg L, Bohman D. Analyzing Nursing Students’ Relation to Electronic Health and Technology as Individuals and Students and in Their Future Career (the eNursEd Study): Protocol for a Longitudinal Study. JMIR Research Protocols 2019;8(10):e14643 View
  4. Asan O, Holden R, Flynn K, Murkowski K, Scanlon M. Providers’ assessment of a novel interactive health information technology in a pediatric intensive care unit. JAMIA Open 2018;1(1):32 View
  5. Vindrola-Padros C, Vindrola-Padros B. Quick and dirty? A systematic review of the use of rapid ethnographies in healthcare organisation and delivery. BMJ Quality & Safety 2018;27(4):321 View
  6. van Eenbergen M, van den Hurk C, Mols F, van de Poll-Franse L. Usability of an online application for reporting the burden of side effects in cancer patients. Supportive Care in Cancer 2019;27(9):3411 View
  7. Asan O, Scanlon M, Crotty B, Holden R, Flynn K. Parental Perceptions of Displayed Patient Data in a PICU: An Example of Unintentional Empowerment*. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2019;20(5):435 View
  8. Huter K, Krick T, Domhoff D, Seibert K, Wolf-Ostermann K, Rothgang H. <p>Effectiveness of Digital Technologies to Support Nursing Care: Results of a Scoping Review</p>. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare 2020;Volume 13:1905 View
  9. Alarifi M, Patrick T, Jabour A, Wu M, Luo J. Full Radiology Report through Patient Web Portal: A Literature Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020;17(10):3673 View
  10. Sabino L, Ferreira Á, Mendes E, Melo E, Penha J, Lima K, Nascimento L, Lima F, Melo R, de Almeida P, Barbosa L. Educational interventions using a primer and motivational interviewing: randomized clinical trial. European Journal of Public Health 2021;31(5):985 View
  11. Guarino J. Innovative Strategies to Facilitate Safe Assessment and Intervention for Intimate Partner Violence During a Pandemic and Beyond. Nursing for Women's Health 2021;25(5):395 View
  12. Howell B, Deyo P, Swartwout E, Herdman N, Caldwell V, Miller C, Hui V. Impact of Patient Engagement on Tailored Education for Joint Replacement Population Using Technology. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 2021;39(12):890 View
  13. Wallington S, Noel A. Communicating with Community. Medical Clinics of North America 2022;106(4):715 View
  14. Gleason L, Xie R, Wood L, Shao C, Dos Santos Marques I, Donahue J, Wei B, Davies J, Kennedy G, Chu D. Cost-benefit analysis of a patient engagement technology (PET) in cardiac, thoracic, and colorectal surgery. The American Journal of Surgery 2022;224(3):979 View
  15. Bazinski M, Riley P, Ellis J, Darmody J. A Quality Initiative Incorporating Tablet Technology to Facilitate Nonpharmacologic Pain Intervention Use in the Hospital. Pain Management Nursing 2022;23(5):655 View
  16. Selvakumar S, Baviriseaty N, Perez-Colon E. Letter to the Editor: Inpatient Understanding of Their Care Team and Receipt of Mixed Messages: A Two-Site Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2024 View