This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Email Communication, Web-Based Communication, Secure Messaging (160)

Published on in Vol 17, No 3 (2015): March

Patient Use of Email for Health Care Communication Purposes Across 14 European Countries: An Analysis of Users According to Demographic and Health-Related Factors

Patient Use of Email for Health Care Communication Purposes Across 14 European Countries: An Analysis of Users According to Demographic and Health-Related Factors

Patient Use of Email for Health Care Communication Purposes Across 14 European Countries: An Analysis of Users According to Demographic and Health-Related Factors

Authors of this article:

Nikki Newhouse1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Francisco Lupiáñez-Villanueva3, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Cristiano Codagnone4, 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Helen Atherton1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (53) Tweetations (74) Metrics

Journals

  1. Atherton H, Brant H, Ziebland S, Bikker A, Campbell J, Gibson A, McKinstry B, Porqueddu T, Salisbury C. The potential of alternatives to face-to-face consultation in general practice, and the impact on different patient groups: a mixed-methods case study. Health Services and Delivery Research 2018;6(20):1 View
  2. Kruse C, Mileski M, Moreno J. Mobile health solutions for the aging population: A systematic narrative analysis. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2017;23(4):439 View
  3. Atherton H, Ziebland S. What do we need to consider when planning, implementing and researching the use of alternatives to face-to-face consultations in primary healthcare?. DIGITAL HEALTH 2016;2 View
  4. Sadeh-Sharvit S. Use of Technology in the Assessment and Treatment of Eating Disorders in Youth. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America 2019;28(4):653 View
  5. Fage‐Butler A, Nisbeth Jensen M. Medical terminology in online patient–patient communication: evidence of high health literacy?. Health Expectations 2016;19(3):643 View
  6. Lie S, Karlsen B, Graue M, Oftedal B. The influence of an eHealth intervention for adults with type 2 diabetes on the patient–nurse relationship: a qualitative study. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 2019;33(3):741 View
  7. Sotillos-González B, Buiza-Camacho B, Herrera-Usagre M, Escobar-Ubreva Á, Fernández-Bermejo M, Santana-López V, Ferrero-Álvarez-Rementería J. Visión ciudadana sobre la prescripción de aplicaciones móviles de salud y el uso de tecnologías de la información y la comunicación en el entorno sanitario en Andalucía. Journal of Healthcare Quality Research 2018;33(4):225 View
  8. Li H, Xu J, Li L, Meng Q. Health-Related Internet Use in Hard-to-Reach Populations: Empirical Findings From a Survey in a Remote and Mountainous Province in China. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(5):e12693 View
  9. Ramos Salazar L. Exploring the Associations of Chronically Ill Patients’ Listening Styles and Medical Communication Competence in Patient–Doctor Interactions. Psychological Studies 2020;65(3):270 View
  10. Chang F, Paramsothy T, Roche M, Gupta N. Patient, staff, and clinician perspectives on implementing electronic communications in an interdisciplinary rural family health practice. Primary Health Care Research & Development 2017;18(02):149 View
  11. Poli Neto P, Tesser C, Monteiro G, Boso P, Lemos G. O uso do correio eletrônico na comunicação entre usuários e uma equipe de saúde da família: relato de experiência. Revista Brasileira de Medicina de Família e Comunidade 2015;10(37):1 View
  12. Roettl J, Bidmon S, Terlutter R. What Predicts Patients’ Willingness to Undergo Online Treatment and Pay for Online Treatment? Results from a Web-Based Survey to Investigate the Changing Patient-Physician Relationship. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(2):e32 View
  13. Dash J, Haller D, Sommer J, Junod Perron N. Use of email, cell phone and text message between patients and primary-care physicians: cross-sectional study in a French-speaking part of Switzerland. BMC Health Services Research 2016;16(1) View
  14. Mattarozzi K, Sfrisi F, Caniglia F, De Palma A, Martoni M. What patients’ complaints and praise tell the health practitioner: implications for health care quality. A qualitative research study. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2016 View
  15. Looten V, Neuraz A, Garcelon N, Burgun A, Chatellier G, Rance B. The Epidemiology of Patients' Email Addresses in a French University Hospital: Case-Control Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(2):e13992 View
  16. Mohammed M, Montague J, Faisal M, Lamming L. The value of a Patient Access Portal in primary care: a cross-sectional survey of 62,486 registered users in the UK. Universal Access in the Information Society 2020;19(4):855 View
  17. Rorie D, Flynn R, Mackenzie I, MacDonald T, Rogers A. The Treatment In Morning versus Evening (TIME) study: analysis of recruitment, follow-up and retention rates post-recruitment. Trials 2017;18(1) View
  18. Huxley C, Atherton H, Watkins J, Griffiths F. Digital communication between clinician and patient and the impact on marginalised groups: a realist review in general practice. British Journal of General Practice 2015;65(641):e813 View
  19. Björk A, Hillborg H, Augutis M, Umefjord G. Evolving techniques in text-based medical consultation – Physicians’ long-term experiences at an Ask the doctor service. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2017;105:83 View
  20. Brant H, Atherton H, Ziebland S, McKinstry B, Campbell J, Salisbury C. Using alternatives to face-to-face consultations: a survey of prevalence and attitudes in general practice. British Journal of General Practice 2016;66(648):e460 View
  21. Armoiry X, Sturt J, Phelps E, Walker C, Court R, Taggart F, Sutcliffe P, Griffiths F, Atherton H. Digital Clinical Communication for Families and Caregivers of Children or Young People With Short- or Long-Term Conditions: Rapid Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(1):e5 View
  22. Yin R, Neyens D. Online Health Resource Use by Individuals With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Analysis Using the National Health Interview Survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(9):e15352 View
  23. Nolas S, Watters C, Pratt-Boyden K, Maglajlic R. Place, mobility and social support in refugee mental health. International Journal of Migration, Health and Social Care 2020;16(4):333 View
  24. van Eenbergen M, Vromans R, Boll D, Kil P, Vos C, Krahmer E, Mols F, van de Poll‐Franse L. Changes in internet use and wishes of cancer survivors: A comparison between 2005 and 2017. Cancer 2020;126(2):408 View
  25. Ding X, Chen Y, Ding Z, Xu Y. Boundary Negotiation for Patient-Provider Communication via WeChat in China. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2019;3(CSCW):1 View
  26. Khoong E, Rivadeneira N, Hiatt R, Sarkar U. The Use of Technology for Communicating With Clinicians or Seeking Health Information in a Multilingual Urban Cohort: Cross-Sectional Survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(4):e16951 View
  27. Casey M, Shaw S, Swinglehurst D. Experiences with online consultation systems in primary care: case study of one early adopter site. British Journal of General Practice 2017;67(664):e736 View
  28. Voruganti T, Grunfeld E, Makuwaza T, Bender J. Web-Based Tools for Text-Based Patient-Provider Communication in Chronic Conditions: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(10):e366 View
  29. Grønning A, Assing Hvidt E, Nisbeth Brøgger M, Fage-Butler A. How do patients and general practitioners in Denmark perceive the communicative advantages and disadvantages of access via email consultations? A media-theoretical qualitative study. BMJ Open 2020;10(10):e039442 View
  30. Assing Hvidt E, Søndergaard J, Klausen M, Grønning A. Not just an information-delivery tool. An ethnographic study exploring Danish GPs’ perspectives on and experiences with the relational potential of email consultation. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 2020;38(4):411 View
  31. SARIHAN M. SAĞLIK HİZMETLERİ VE YENİLİKÇİ SAĞLIK TEKNOLOJİLERİNE ERİŞİMDE EŞİTSİZLİKLER. European Journal of Science and Technology 2021 View
  32. Goniewicz K, Carlström E, Hertelendy A, Burkle F, Goniewicz M, Lasota D, Richmond J, Khorram-Manesh A. Integrated Healthcare and the Dilemma of Public Health Emergencies. Sustainability 2021;13(8):4517 View
  33. Solans O, Vidal-Alaball J, Roig Cabo P, Mora N, Coma E, Bonet Simó J, Hermosilla Pérez E, Saigí-Rubió F, Olmos Domínguez C, Piera-Jiménez J, Abizanda González M, López Seguí F. Characteristics of Citizens and Their Use of Teleconsultations in Primary Care in the Catalan Public Health System Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Descriptive Cross-sectional Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(5):e28629 View
  34. Assing Hvidt E, Grønning A, Nisbeth Brøgger M, Møller J, Fage-Butler A. Multilevel structures and human agency in relation to email consultations: A strong structuration theory analysis of the Danish general practice setting. Social Science & Medicine 2021;282:114155 View
  35. Pagliari C. Digital health and primary care: Past, pandemic and prospects. Journal of Global Health 2021;11 View
  36. Nijhof D, Ingram A, Ochieng R, Roberts E, Poulton B, Ochieng B. Examining GP online consultation in a primary care setting in east midlands, UK. BMC Health Services Research 2021;21(1) View
  37. Onyeaka H, Muoghalu C, Deary E, Ajayi K, Kyeremeh E, Dosunmu T, Jawla M, Onaku E, Nwani S, Asante K, Amonoo H. The Role of Health Information Technology in Improving Awareness of Human Papillomavirus and Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Among U.S. Adults. Telemedicine and e-Health 2023;29(6):886 View
  38. Kristiansen E, Atherton H, Austad B, Bergmo T, Norberg B, Zanaboni P. Older patients’ experiences of access to and use of e-consultations with the general practitioner in Norway: an interview study. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 2023;41(1):33 View
  39. Fernández Coves A, Yeung K, van der Putten I, Nelson E. Teleconsultation adoption since COVID-19: Comparison of barriers and facilitators in primary care settings in Hong Kong and the Netherlands. Health Policy 2022;126(10):933 View
  40. Mueller B, Sweetnam C, Klenofsky B, Pace A, Grant J, Natbony L, Robinson‐Papp J, Kummer B. A retrospective cohort study of clinical factors, visit patterns, and demographic factors associated with use of remote communications in patients with headache. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain 2021;61(10):1521 View
  41. Jensen L, Ghaffari A, Dinesen B, Rahbek O, Kold S. Scoping review protocol to map the use of text-based two-way communication between patients and healthcare professionals after hospital discharge and identify facilitators and barriers to implementation. BMJ Open 2022;12(9):e062087 View
  42. Grønning A. Struggling with and mastering e-mail consultations: A study of access, interaction, and participation in a digital health care system. Nordicom Review 2021;42(s4):7 View
  43. Assing Hvidt E, Christensen N, Grønning A, Jepsen C, Lüchau E. What are patients’ first-time experiences with video consulting? A qualitative interview study in Danish general practice in times of COVID-19. BMJ Open 2022;12(4):e054415 View
  44. Bavngaard M, Grønning A. Older (65+) patients’ use of e-mail consultations: A Danish qualitative study using a Foucauldian framework. Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies 2021;13(2):179 View
  45. Vučak J, Popovic B, Ljubotina A, Vojvodić Ž, Sabljak D, Zavidić T. Changes in consultation mode during different phases of the COVID-19 pandemic in Croatian family medicine: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2023;13(1):e066325 View
  46. Mohammadnejad F, Freeman S, Klassen-Ross T, Hemingway D, Banner D. Impacts of Technology Use on the Workload of Registered Nurses: A Scoping Review. Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering 2023;10 View
  47. Jensen L, Rahbek O, Lauritsen R, Kold S, Dinesen B. Patient Perspectives on Communication Pathways After Orthopedic Surgery and Discharge and Evaluation of Team-Based Digital Communication: Qualitative Exploratory Study. JMIR Human Factors 2024;11:e49696 View
  48. Newhouse N, Martin A, Jawad S, Yu L, Davoudianfar M, Locock L, Ziebland S, Powell J. Randomised feasibility study of a novel experience-based internet intervention to support self-management in chronic asthma. BMJ Open 2016;6(12):e013401 View
  49. Edwards H, Marques E, Hollingworth W, Horwood J, Farr M, Bernard E, Salisbury C, Northstone K. Use of a primary care online consultation system, by whom, when and why: evaluation of a pilot observational study in 36 general practices in South West England. BMJ Open 2017;7(11):e016901 View
  50. Huygens M, Swinkels I, Verheij R, Friele R, van Schayck O, de Witte L. Understanding the use of email consultation in primary care using a retrospective observational study with data of Dutch electronic health records. BMJ Open 2018;8(1):e019233 View
  51. Junkins Z, Zahan N, Neyens D. Examining Individuals’ Use of The Internet for Healthcare Activities Over Time: Statistical Analysis Of NHIS Data (Preprint). JMIR Human Factors 2024 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Katnić I, Jakšić-Stojanović A. New Technologies, Development and Application V. View