Impact of Scientific Versus Emotional Wording of Patient Questions on Doctor-Patient Communication in an Internet Forum: A Randomized Controlled Experiment with Medical Students

Journals

1. Bientzle M, Fissler T, Cress U, Kimmerle J. The impact of physicians' communication styles on evaluation of physicians and information processing: A randomized study with simulated video consultations on contraception with an intrauterine device. Health Expectations 2017;20(5):845 View
2. Kimmerle J, Bientzle M, Cress U. “Scientific evidence is very important for me”: The impact of behavioral intention and the wording of user inquiries on replies and recommendations in a health-related online forum. Computers in Human Behavior 2017;73:320 View
3. König L, Jucks R. Influence of Enthusiastic Language on the Credibility of Health Information and the Trustworthiness of Science Communicators: Insights From a Between-Subject Web-Based Experiment. Interactive Journal of Medical Research 2019;8(3):e13619 View
4. Taveira-Gomes T, Ferreira P, Taveira-Gomes I, Severo M, Ferreira M. What Are We Looking for in Computer-Based Learning Interventions in Medical Education? A Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(8):e204 View
5. Bientzle M, Hircin E, Kimmerle J, Knipfer C, Smeets R, Gaudin R, Holtz P. Association of Online Learning Behavior and Learning Outcomes for Medical Students: Large-Scale Usage Data Analysis. JMIR Medical Education 2019;5(2):e13529 View
6. Bientzle M, Cress U, Kimmerle J. Development of domain-specific epistemological beliefs of physiotherapists: a longitudinal study. BMC Medical Education 2019;19(1) View
7. Zimmermann M, Jucks R. How Experts’ Use of Medical Technical Jargon in Different Types of Online Health Forums Affects Perceived Information Credibility: Randomized Experiment With Laypersons. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(1):e30 View
8. Petrič G, Atanasova S, Kamin T. Impact of Social Processes in Online Health Communities on Patient Empowerment in Relationship With the Physician: Emergence of Functional and Dysfunctional Empowerment. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(3):e74 View
9. König L, Jucks R. Effects of Positive Language and Profession on Trustworthiness and Credibility in Online Health Advice: Experimental Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(3):e16685 View
10. Tates K, Antheunis M, Kanters S, Nieboer T, Gerritse M. The Effect of Screen-to-Screen Versus Face-to-Face Consultation on Doctor-Patient Communication: An Experimental Study with Simulated Patients. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(12):e421 View
11. Kümmel E, Moskaliuk J, Cress U, Kimmerle J. Digital Learning Environments in Higher Education: A Literature Review of the Role of Individual vs. Social Settings for Measuring Learning Outcomes. Education Sciences 2020;10(3):78 View
12. Zimmermann M, Jucks R. Investigating the Role of Communication for Information Seekers’ Trust-Related Evaluations of Health Videos on the Web: Content Analysis, Survey Data, and Experiment. Interactive Journal of Medical Research 2018;7(2):e10282 View
13. Du L, Xu J, Chen X, Zhu X, Zhang Y, Wu R, Ji H, Zhou L. Rebuild doctor–patient trust in medical service delivery in China. Scientific Reports 2020;10(1) View
14. Gilligan C, Powell M, Lynagh M, Ward B, Lonsdale C, Harvey P, James E, Rich D, Dewi S, Nepal S, Croft H, Silverman J. Interventions for improving medical students' interpersonal communication in medical consultations. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2021;2021(2) View
15. Kim Y, Song D, Lee Y. #Antivaccination on Instagram: A Computational Analysis of Hashtag Activism through Photos and Public Responses. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020;17(20):7550 View
16. Bientzle M, Eggeling M, Kanzleiter M, Thieme K, Kimmerle J, Pikhart M. The impact of narrative writing on empathy, perspective-taking, and attitude: Two randomized controlled experiments on violations of Covid-19 protection regulations. PLOS ONE 2021;16(7):e0254501 View
17. Koya K, Chowdhury G, Green E. Young informal carers’ information needs communicated online: Professional and personal growth, finance, health and relationships. Journal of Information Science 2024;50(3):738 View
18. Jain G, Walter L, Reed C, O’Donnell P, Troy J, Sirufo M. How do patients and physicians communicate about hereditary angioedema in the United States?. PLOS ONE 2021;16(12):e0260805 View
19. Shan Y, Ji M, Xie W, Qian X, Li R, Zhang X, Hao T. Language Use in Conversational Agent–Based Health Communication: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2022;24(7):e37403 View
20. Lozano-Durán A, Rudolphi-Solero T, Nava-Baro E, Ruiz-Gómez M, Sendra-Portero F. Training Scientific Communication Skills on Medical Imaging within the Virtual World Second Life: Perception of Biomedical Engineering Students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2023;20(3):1697 View
21. Festl-Wietek T, Erschens R, Griewatz J, Zipfel S, Herrmann-Werner A. How to communicate with patients in written asynchronous online conversations: an intervention study with undergraduate medical students in a cross-over design. Frontiers in Medicine 2023;10 View
22. Brose S, Binder K, Fischer M, Reincke M, Braun L, Schmidmaier R, Mariño I. Bayesian versus diagnostic information in physician-patient communication: Effects of direction of statistical information and presentation of visualization. PLOS ONE 2023;18(6):e0283947 View
23. Bientzle M, Eggeling M, Kimmerle J. Good reasons for bad behavior: a randomized controlled experiment on the impact of narrative reading and writing on empathic concern, perspective-taking, and attitude. Frontiers in Public Health 2024;12 View

Books/Policy Documents

1. Kimmerle J, Bientzle M, Cress U, Flemming D, Greving H, Grapendorf J, Sassenrath C, Sassenberg K. Informational Environments. View
2. He Z. Social Web and Health Research. View