Published on in Vol 16, No 5 (2014): May

Experiences of Multidisciplinary Development Team Members During User-Centered Design of Telecare Products and Services: A Qualitative Study

Experiences of Multidisciplinary Development Team Members During User-Centered Design of Telecare Products and Services: A Qualitative Study

Experiences of Multidisciplinary Development Team Members During User-Centered Design of Telecare Products and Services: A Qualitative Study

Journals

  1. Harte R, Glynn L, Rodríguez-Molinero A, Baker P, Scharf T, Quinlan L, ÓLaighin G. A Human-Centered Design Methodology to Enhance the Usability, Human Factors, and User Experience of Connected Health Systems: A Three-Phase Methodology. JMIR Human Factors 2017;4(1):e8 View
  2. Holden R, Kulanthaivel A, Purkayastha S, Goggins K, Kripalani S. Know thy eHealth user: Development of biopsychosocial personas from a study of older adults with heart failure. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2017;108:158 View
  3. Aghdam M, Vodovnik A, Hameed R. Role of Telemedicine in Multidisciplinary Team Meetings. Journal of Pathology Informatics 2019;10(1):35 View
  4. Kim S, Trinidad B, Mikesell L, Aakhus M. Improving prognosis communication for patients facing complex medical treatment: A user-centered design approach. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2020;141:104147 View
  5. del Río Carral M, Roux P, Bruchez C, Santiago-Delefosse M. Santé digitale : promesses, défis et craintes. Une revue de la littérature. Pratiques Psychologiques 2017;23(1):61 View
  6. Revenäs Å, Hvitfeldt Forsberg H, Granström E, Wannheden C. Co-Designing an eHealth Service for the Co-Care of Parkinson Disease: Explorative Study of Values and Challenges. JMIR Research Protocols 2018;7(10):e11278 View
  7. Liberati G, Pizzimenti A, Simione L, Riccio A, Schettini F, Inghilleri M, Mattia D, Cincotti F. Developing brain-computer interfaces from a user-centered perspective: Assessing the needs of persons with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, caregivers, and professionals. Applied Ergonomics 2015;50:139 View
  8. Yardley L, Morrison L, Bradbury K, Muller I. The Person-Based Approach to Intervention Development: Application to Digital Health-Related Behavior Change Interventions. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2015;17(1):e30 View
  9. Hochstenbach L, Courtens A, Zwakhalen S, Vermeulen J, van Kleef M, de Witte L. Co-creative development of an eHealth nursing intervention: Self-management support for outpatients with cancer pain. Applied Nursing Research 2017;36:1 View
  10. Baslyman M, Almoaber B, Amyot D, Bouattane E. Using Goals and Indicators for Activity-based Process Integration in Healthcare. Procedia Computer Science 2017;113:318 View
  11. Revenäs Å, Martin C, H. Opava C, Brusewitz M, Keller C, Åsenlöf P. A Mobile Internet Service for Self-Management of Physical Activity in People With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Challenges in Advancing the Co-Design Process During the Requirements Specification Phase. JMIR Research Protocols 2015;4(3):e111 View
  12. Jing L, Jiang S, Li J, Peng X, Ma J. A cooperative game theory based user-centered medical device design decision approach under uncertainty. Advanced Engineering Informatics 2021;47:101204 View
  13. Martins N, Dominique-Ferreira S, Lopes C. Design and development of a digital platform for seasonal jobs: Improving the hiring process. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science 2022;32(3):452 View
  14. Liao C, Chuang H. Determinants of innovative green electronics: An experimental study of eco-friendly laptop computers. Technovation 2022;113:102424 View
  15. Chen S, Edwards I, Jayasena R, Ding H, Karunanithi M, Dowling A, Layland J, Maiorana A. Patient Perspectives on Innovative Telemonitoring Enhanced Care Program for Chronic Heart Failure (ITEC-CHF): Usability Study. JMIR Cardio 2021;5(2):e24611 View
  16. Hose B, Carayon P, Hoonakker P, Ross J, Eithun B, Rusy D, Kohler J, Brazelton T, Dean S, Kelly M. Managing multiple perspectives in the collaborative design process of a team health information technology. Applied Ergonomics 2023;106:103846 View
  17. Ji M, Chen X, Genchev G, Wei M, Yu G. Status of AI-Enabled Clinical Decision Support Systems Implementations in China. Methods of Information in Medicine 2021;60(05/06):123 View
  18. Hurmuz M, Jansen-Kosterink S, van Velsen L. How to Prevent the Drop-Out: Understanding Why Adults Participate in Summative eHealth Evaluations. Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research 2023;7(1):125 View
  19. Engelmann P, Eilerskov N, Thilsing T, Bernardini F, Rasmussen S, Löwe B, Herrmann-Lingen C, Gostoli S, Andréasson F, Rafanelli C, Pedersen S, Jaarsma T, Kohlmann S. Needs of multimorbid heart failure patients and their carers: a qualitative interview study and the creation of personas as a basis for a blended collaborative care intervention. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 2023;10 View
  20. Latuapon E, Hochstenbach L, Mahr D, Scheenstra B, Kietselaer B, Spreeuwenberg M. Cocreation to Facilitate Communication and Collaboration Between Multidisciplinary Stakeholders in eHealth Research and Development: Case Study of the CARRIER (Coronary Artery Disease: Risk Estimations and Interventions for Prevention and Early Detection) Consortium. JMIR Human Factors 2023;10:e45006 View
  21. Schramm L, Carbon C. Critical success factors for creating sustainable digital health applications: A systematic review of the German case. DIGITAL HEALTH 2024;10 View
  22. Gebregergs G, Berhe G, Gebrehiwot K, Mulugeta A. A qualitative study to inform the development of a decision support tool for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in Tigray, Ethiopia. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2024;24(1) View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Baslyman M, Almoaber B, Amyot D, Bouattane E. E-Technologies: Embracing the Internet of Things. View