This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Electronic/Mobile Data Capture, Internet-based Survey & Research Methodology (832) Digital Mental Health Interventions, e-Mental Health and Cyberpsychology (1514) mHealth for Data Collection and Research (955) Anxiety and Stress Disorders (1053)

Published on in Vol 16, No 10 (2014): October

Tablet, Web-Based, or Paper Questionnaires for Measuring Anxiety in Patients Suspected of Breast Cancer: Patients' Preferences and Quality of Collected Data

Tablet, Web-Based, or Paper Questionnaires for Measuring Anxiety in Patients Suspected of Breast Cancer: Patients' Preferences and Quality of Collected Data

Tablet, Web-Based, or Paper Questionnaires for Measuring Anxiety in Patients Suspected of Breast Cancer: Patients' Preferences and Quality of Collected Data

Authors of this article:

Maarten W Barentsz1 Author Orcid Image ;   Hester Wessels1 Author Orcid Image ;   Paul J van Diest1 Author Orcid Image ;   Ruud M Pijnappel1 Author Orcid Image ;   Cees Haaring1 Author Orcid Image ;   Carmen C van der Pol1 Author Orcid Image ;   Arjen J Witkamp1 Author Orcid Image ;   Maurice A van den Bosch1 Author Orcid Image ;   Helena M Verkooijen1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (25) Tweetations (7) Metrics

Journals

  1. Martin P, Brown M, Espin-Garcia O, Cuffe S, Pringle D, Mahler M, Villeneuve J, Niu C, Charow R, Lam C, Shani R, Hon H, Otsuka M, Xu W, Alibhai S, Jenkinson J, Liu G. Patient preference: a comparison of electronic patient-completed questionnaires with paper among cancer patients. European Journal of Cancer Care 2016;25(2):334 View
  2. Kouri A, Yamada J, Sale J, Straus S, Gupta S. Primary Care Pre-Visit Electronic Patient Questionnaire for Asthma: Uptake Analysis and Predictor Modeling. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(9):e19358 View
  3. Mlikotic R, Parker B, Rajapakshe R. Assessing the Effects of Participant Preference and Demographics in the Usage of Web-based Survey Questionnaires by Women Attending Screening Mammography in British Columbia. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(3):e70 View
  4. Palmer C, Farhan B, Nguyen N, Zhang L, Do R, Nguyen D, Ghoniem G. Are Electronic and Paper Questionnaires Equivalent to Assess Patients with Overactive Bladder?. Journal of Urology 2018;200(2):369 View
  5. Grace R, Kemp L, Barnes J, Elcombe E, Knight J, Baird K, Webster V, Byrne F. Community Volunteer Support for Families With Young Children: Protocol for the Volunteer Family Connect Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Research Protocols 2018;7(7):e10000 View
  6. Ziemssen T, Kern R, Voigt I, Haase R. Data Collection in Multiple Sclerosis: The MSDS Approach. Frontiers in Neurology 2020;11 View
  7. Matthies L, Taran F, Keilmann L, Schneeweiss A, Simoes E, Hartkopf A, Sokolov A, Walter C, Sickenberger N, Wallwiener S, Feisst M, Gass P, Lux M, Schuetz F, Fasching P, Sohn C, Brucker S, Graf J, Wallwiener M. An Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Tool for the FACT-B (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast) Questionnaire for Measuring the Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Breast Cancer: Reliability Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(1):e10004 View
  8. Klaassen L, Dirksen C, Boersma L, Hoving C. Developing an aftercare decision aid; assessing health professionals' and patients' preferences. European Journal of Cancer Care 2018;27(2):e12730 View
  9. Hartkopf A, Graf J, Simoes E, Keilmann L, Sickenberger N, Gass P, Wallwiener D, Matthies L, Taran F, Lux M, Wallwiener S, Belleville E, Sohn C, Fasching P, Schneeweiss A, Brucker S, Wallwiener M. Electronic-Based Patient-Reported Outcomes: Willingness, Needs, and Barriers in Adjuvant and Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients. JMIR Cancer 2017;3(2):e11 View
  10. Karsten M, Speiser D, Hartmann C, Zeuschner N, Lippold K, Kiver V, Gocke P, Kirchberger V, Blohmer J. Web-Based Patient-Reported Outcomes Using the International Consortium for Health Outcome Measurement Dataset in a Major German University Hospital: Observational Study. JMIR Cancer 2018;4(2):e11373 View
  11. Anderson J, Glass N, Campbell J. Conducting Clinically Based Intimate Partner Violence Research. Nursing Research 2017;66(5):405 View
  12. Azevedo B, Oliveira C, Araujo G, Silva F, Damato T, Pinto R, Christofaro D. Is There Equivalence Between the Electronic and Paper Version of the Questionnaires for Assessment of Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain?. Spine 2020;45(6):E329 View
  13. Determann D, Lambooij M, Steyerberg E, de Bekker-Grob E, de Wit G. Impact of Survey Administration Mode on the Results of a Health-Related Discrete Choice Experiment: Online and Paper Comparison. Value in Health 2017;20(7):953 View
  14. Pejtersen J, Claydon-Mueller L. The effect of monetary incentive on survey response for vulnerable children and youths: A randomized controlled trial. PLOS ONE 2020;15(5):e0233025 View
  15. Fitzgerald D, Hockey R, Jones M, Mishra G, Waller M, Dobson A. Use of Online or Paper Surveys by Australian Women: Longitudinal Study of Users, Devices, and Cohort Retention. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(3):e10672 View
  16. Engan H, Hilmarsen C, Sittlinger S, Sandmæl J, Skanke F, Oldervoll L. Are web-based questionnaires accepted in patients attending rehabilitation?. Disability and Rehabilitation 2016;38(24):2406 View
  17. Wallwiener M, Matthies L, Simoes E, Keilmann L, Hartkopf A, Sokolov A, Walter C, Sickenberger N, Wallwiener S, Feisst M, Gass P, Fasching P, Lux M, Wallwiener D, Taran F, Rom J, Schneeweiss A, Graf J, Brucker S. Reliability of an e-PRO Tool of EORTC QLQ-C30 for Measurement of Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Breast Cancer: Prospective Randomized Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(9):e322 View
  18. Yamada J, Kouri A, Simard S, Segovia S, Gupta S. Barriers and Enablers to Using a Patient-Facing Electronic Questionnaire: A Qualitative Theoretical Domains Framework Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(10):e19474 View
  19. Ma J, Zou Z, Pazo E, Moutari S, Liu Y, Jin F. Comparative Analysis of Paper-Based and Web-Based Versions of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer Symptom Index (NFBSI-16) Questionnaire in Breast Cancer Patients: Randomized Crossover Study. JMIR Medical Informatics 2021;9(3):e18269 View
  20. Bratan T, Aichinger H, Brkic N, Rueter J, Apfelbacher C, Boyer L, Loss J. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on ongoing health research: an ad hoc survey among investigators in Germany. BMJ Open 2021;11(12):e049086 View
  21. Moura L, Schwamm E, Moura Junior V, Seitz M, Hsu J, Cole A, Schwamm L. Feasibility of the collection of patient-reported outcomes in an ambulatory neurology clinic. Neurology 2016;87(23):2435 View
  22. Yu H, Yu Q, Nie Y, Xu W, Pu Y, Dai W, Wei X, Shi Q. Data Quality of Longitudinally Collected Patient-Reported Outcomes After Thoracic Surgery: Comparison of Paper- and Web-Based Assessments. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(11):e28915 View
  23. Ma X, Yang X, Yin H, Wang Y, Tian Y, Long C, Bai C, Dong F, Wang Z, Liu T, Gu X. Stunting among kindergarten children in China in the context of COVID-19: A cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Pediatrics 2022;10 View
  24. Baser B, Gulnar B, Tuhan Kutlu E. Comparison of conventionally and digitally completed patient consent-anamnesis forms in terms of surface contamination. Technology and Health Care 2023;31(5):1737 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Naeim A, Xie Z, Johansen L, Wenger N, Elashoff D, Petruse A, Rahbar G. Research Anthology on Advancements in Women's Health and Reproductive Rights. View