This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Digital Mental Health Interventions, e-Mental Health and Cyberpsychology (1514)

Published on in Vol 15, No 9 (2013): September

Online Mental Health Resources in Rural Australia: Clinician Perceptions of Acceptability

Online Mental Health Resources in Rural Australia: Clinician Perceptions of Acceptability

Online Mental Health Resources in Rural Australia: Clinician Perceptions of Acceptability

Authors of this article:

Craig Sinclair1 Author Orcid Image ;   Kristi Holloway2 ;   Geoffrey Riley1 ;   Kirsten Auret1
Article Authors Cited by (74) Tweetations (6) Metrics

Journals

  1. Christensen L, Gildberg F, Sibbersen C, Skjoeth M, Nielsen C, Hansen J. Disagreement in Satisfaction Between Patients and Providers in the Use of Videoconferences by Depressed Adults. Telemedicine and e-Health 2020;26(5):614 View
  2. Fernández-Álvarez J, Díaz-García A, González-Robles A, Baños R, García-Palacios A, Botella C. Dropping out of a transdiagnostic online intervention: A qualitative analysis of client's experiences. Internet Interventions 2017;10:29 View
  3. Lee H, Ju Y, Park E. Utilization of professional mental health services according to recognition rate of mental health centers. Psychiatry Research 2017;250:204 View
  4. Meurk C, Leung J, Hall W, Head B, Whiteford H. Establishing and Governing e-Mental Health Care in Australia: A Systematic Review of Challenges and A Call For Policy-Focussed Research. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(1):e10 View
  5. Apolinário-Hagen J, Vehreschild V, Alkoudmani R. Current Views and Perspectives on E-Mental Health: An Exploratory Survey Study for Understanding Public Attitudes Toward Internet-Based Psychotherapy in Germany. JMIR Mental Health 2017;4(1):e8 View
  6. Duffy D, Enrique A, Connell S, Connolly C, Richards D. Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavior Therapy as a Prequel to Face-To-Face Therapy for Depression and Anxiety: A Naturalistic Observation. Frontiers in Psychiatry 2020;10 View
  7. Hennemann S, Beutel M, Zwerenz R. Ready for eHealth? Health Professionals’ Acceptance and Adoption of eHealth Interventions in Inpatient Routine Care. Journal of Health Communication 2017;22(3):274 View
  8. Surmann M, Lencer R. Behandlungsassistenz durch elektronische Medien in der Schizophrenieversorgung. Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie 2017;65(2):95 View
  9. Alberts N, Hadjistavropoulos H, Titov N, Dear B. Patient and provider perceptions of Internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for recent cancer survivors. Supportive Care in Cancer 2018;26(2):597 View
  10. Granja C, Janssen W, Johansen M. Factors Determining the Success and Failure of eHealth Interventions: Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(5):e10235 View
  11. Grainger R, Devan H, Sangelaji B, Hay-Smith J. Issues in reporting of systematic review methods in health app-focused reviews: A scoping review. Health Informatics Journal 2020;26(4):2930 View
  12. Donovan C, Poole C, Boyes N, Redgate J, March S. Australian mental health worker attitudes towards cCBT: What is the role of knowledge? Are there differences? Can we change them?. Internet Interventions 2015;2(4):372 View
  13. Sturk H, Crowther R, Kavanagh D. Head to health: Practitioner perceptions of the new digital mental health gateway. Australian Journal of Rural Health 2019;27(5):448 View
  14. Bennett-Levy J, Singer J, DuBois S, Hyde K. Translating E-Mental Health Into Practice: What Are the Barriers and Enablers to E-Mental Health Implementation by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Professionals?. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(1):e1 View
  15. Surmann M, Bock E, Krey E, Burmeister K, Arolt V, Lencer R. Einstellungen gegenüber eHealth-Angeboten in Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie. Der Nervenarzt 2017;88(9):1036 View
  16. Feijt M, de Kort Y, Bongers I, IJsselsteijn W. Perceived Drivers and Barriers to the Adoption of eMental Health by Psychologists: The Construction of the Levels of Adoption of eMental Health Model. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(4):e153 View
  17. Batterham P, Kazan D, Banfield M, Brown K. Differences in mental health service use between urban and rural areas of Australia. Australian Psychologist 2020;55(4):327 View
  18. Titzler I, Berking M, Schlicker S, Riper H, Ebert D. Barriers and Facilitators for Referrals of Primary Care Patients to Blended Internet-Based Psychotherapy for Depression: Mixed Methods Study of General Practitioners’ Views. JMIR Mental Health 2020;7(8):e18642 View
  19. Marshall J, Dunstan D, Bartik W. The Digital Psychiatrist: In Search of Evidence-Based Apps for Anxiety and Depression. Frontiers in Psychiatry 2019;10 View
  20. Parsons D, Wilson N, Vaz S, Lee H, Cordier R. Appropriateness of the TOBY Application, an iPad Intervention for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Thematic Approach. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 2019;49(10):4053 View
  21. Marshall J, Dunstan D, Bartik W. Clinical or gimmickal: The use and effectiveness of mobile mental health apps for treating anxiety and depression. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 2020;54(1):20 View
  22. Kerst A, Zielasek J, Gaebel W. Smartphone applications for depression: a systematic literature review and a survey of health care professionals’ attitudes towards their use in clinical practice. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 2020;270(2):139 View
  23. Reynolds J, Griffiths K, Cunningham J, Bennett K, Bennett A. Clinical Practice Models for the Use of E-Mental Health Resources in Primary Health Care by Health Professionals and Peer Workers: A Conceptual Framework. JMIR Mental Health 2015;2(1):e6 View
  24. Hendrikoff L, Kambeitz-Ilankovic L, Pryss R, Senner F, Falkai P, Pogarell O, Hasan A, Peters H. Prospective acceptance of distinct mobile mental health features in psychiatric patients and mental health professionals. Journal of Psychiatric Research 2019;109:126 View
  25. McCashin D, Coyle D, O'Reilly G. A qualitative evaluation of Pesky gNATs in primary care – The experiences of assistant psychologists providing computer-assisted CBT to children experiencing low mood and anxiety. Internet Interventions 2020;22:100348 View
  26. Vis C, Mol M, Kleiboer A, Bührmann L, Finch T, Smit J, Riper H. Improving Implementation of eMental Health for Mood Disorders in Routine Practice: Systematic Review of Barriers and Facilitating Factors. JMIR Mental Health 2018;5(1):e20 View
  27. Berry N, Bucci S, Lobban F. Use of the Internet and Mobile Phones for Self-Management of Severe Mental Health Problems: Qualitative Study of Staff Views. JMIR Mental Health 2017;4(4):e52 View
  28. Jacob C, Sanchez-Vazquez A, Ivory C. Social, Organizational, and Technological Factors Impacting Clinicians’ Adoption of Mobile Health Tools: Systematic Literature Review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(2):e15935 View
  29. Davies F, Shepherd H, Beatty L, Clark B, Butow P, Shaw J. Implementing Web-Based Therapy in Routine Mental Health Care: Systematic Review of Health Professionals’ Perspectives. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(7):e17362 View
  30. Wilhelmsen M, Høifødt R, Kolstrup N, Waterloo K, Eisemann M, Chenhall R, Risør M. Norwegian General Practitioners’ Perspectives on Implementation of a Guided Web-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(9):e208 View
  31. Cheek C, Bridgman H, Fleming T, Cummings E, Ellis L, Lucassen M, Shepherd M, Skinner T. Views of Young People in Rural Australia on SPARX, a Fantasy World Developed for New Zealand Youth With Depression. JMIR Serious Games 2014;2(1):e3 View
  32. Hubley S, Lynch S, Schneck C, Thomas M, Shore J. Review of key telepsychiatry outcomes. World Journal of Psychiatry 2016;6(2):269 View
  33. Clough B, Rowland D, Casey L. Development of the eTAP-T: A measure of mental health professionals' attitudes and process towards e-interventions. Internet Interventions 2019;18:100288 View
  34. Hollis C, Falconer C, Martin J, Whittington C, Stockton S, Glazebrook C, Davies E. Annual Research Review: Digital health interventions for children and young people with mental health problems – a systematic and meta‐review. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2017;58(4):474 View
  35. Luther L, Buck B, Fischer M, Johnson-Kwochka A, Coffin G, Salyers M. Examining Potential Barriers to mHealth Implementation and Engagement in Schizophrenia: Phone Ownership and Symptom Severity. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science 2022;7(1):13 View
  36. Scott Kruse C, Karem P, Shifflett K, Vegi L, Ravi K, Brooks M. Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: A systematic review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2018;24(1):4 View
  37. Orlowski S, Lawn S, Matthews B, Venning A, Wyld K, Jones G, Winsall M, Antezana G, Schrader G, Bidargaddi N. The promise and the reality: a mental health workforce perspective on technology-enhanced youth mental health service delivery. BMC Health Services Research 2016;16(1) View
  38. Bucci S, Berry N, Morris R, Berry K, Haddock G, Lewis S, Edge D. “They Are Not Hard-to-Reach Clients. We Have Just Got Hard-to-Reach Services.” Staff Views of Digital Health Tools in Specialist Mental Health Services.. Frontiers in Psychiatry 2019;10 View
  39. Areli E, Godfrey H, Perry M, Hempel D, Saipe B, Grainger R, Hale L, Devan H. ‘I think there is nothing . . . that is really comprehensive’: healthcare professionals’ views on recommending online resources for pain self-management. British Journal of Pain 2021;15(4):429 View
  40. Ganapathy A, Clough B, Casey L. Organizational and Policy Barriers to the Use of Digital Mental Health by Mental Health Professionals. Telemedicine and e-Health 2021;27(12):1332 View
  41. AlHadi A, Alammari K, Alsiwat L, Alhaidri N, Alabdulkarim N, Altwaijri N, AlSohaili S. Perception of Mental Health Care Professionals in Saudi Arabia on Computerized Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Observational Cross-sectional Study. JMIR Formative Research 2021;5(5):e26294 View
  42. Knapp A, Cohen K, Nicholas J, Mohr D, Carlo A, Skerl J, Lattie E. Integration of Digital Tools Into Community Mental Health Care Settings That Serve Young People: Focus Group Study. JMIR Mental Health 2021;8(8):e27379 View
  43. Kokokyi S, Klest B, Anstey H, Damian A. A patient-oriented research approach to assessing patients’ and primary care physicians’ opinions on trauma-informed care. PLOS ONE 2021;16(7):e0254266 View
  44. Alsahali S. Awareness, Views, Perceptions, and Beliefs of Pharmacy Interns Regarding Digital Health in Saudi Arabia: Cross-sectional Study. JMIR Medical Education 2021;7(3):e31149 View
  45. Brown A, Kelso W, Velakoulis D, Farrand S, Stolwyk R. Understanding Clinician's Experiences with Implementation of a Younger Onset Dementia Telehealth Service. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology 2023;36(4):295 View
  46. Van Daele T, Mathiasen K, Carlbring P, Bernaerts S, Brugnera A, Compare A, Duque A, Eimontas J, Gosar D, Haddouk L, Karekla M, Larsen P, Lo Coco G, Nordgreen T, Salgado J, Schwerdtfeger A, Van Assche E, Willems S, De Witte N. Online consultations in mental healthcare: Modelling determinants of use and experience based on an international survey study at the onset of the pandemic. Internet Interventions 2022;30:100571 View
  47. Mendes-Santos C, Nunes F, Weiderpass E, Santana R, Andersson G. Understanding Mental Health Professionals’ Perspectives and Practices Regarding the Implementation of Digital Mental Health: Qualitative Study. JMIR Formative Research 2022;6(4):e32558 View
  48. Tickner C, Heinsch M, Brosnan C, Kay-Lambkin F. “Another tool in our toolbox”: a scoping review of the use of eHealth technologies in health social work practice. Social Work in Health Care 2023;62(1):1 View
  49. Peng X, Li Z, Zhang C, Wu Q, Gu J, You H. Assessing Determinants of Online Medical Services Adoption Willingness of General Hospital Physicians Using the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills Model: A Multi-Group Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare 2021;Volume 14:3453 View
  50. Bondre A, Shrivastava R, Raghuram H, Tugnawat D, Khan A, Gupta S, Kumar M, Mehta U, Keshavan M, Lakhtakia T, Chand P, Thirthalli J, Patel V, Torous J, Rozatkar A, Naslund J, Bhan A. A qualitative exploration of perceived needs and barriers of individuals with schizophrenia, caregivers and clinicians in using mental health applications in Madhya Pradesh, India. SSM - Mental Health 2022;2:100063 View
  51. Delemere E, Gitonga I, Maguire R. Utility, barriers and facilitators to the use of connected health to support families impacted by paediatric cancer: a qualitative analysis. Supportive Care in Cancer 2022;30(8):6755 View
  52. Fassnacht D, Ali K, van Agteren J, Iasiello M, Mavrangelos T, Furber G, Kyrios M. A Group-Facilitated, Internet-Based Intervention to Promote Mental Health and Well-Being in a Vulnerable Population of University Students: Randomized Controlled Trial of the Be Well Plan Program. JMIR Mental Health 2022;9(5):e37292 View
  53. Rentrop V, Damerau M, Schweda A, Steinbach J, Schüren L, Niedergethmann M, Skoda E, Teufel M, Bäuerle A. Predicting Acceptance of e–Mental Health Interventions in Patients With Obesity by Using an Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance Model: Cross-sectional Study. JMIR Formative Research 2022;6(3):e31229 View
  54. Gutiérrez-Rojas L, Alvarez-Mon M, Andreu-Bernabeu Á, Capitán L, de las Cuevas C, Gómez J, Grande I, Hidalgo-Mazzei D, Mateos R, Moreno-Gea P, De Vicente-Muñoz T, Ferre F. Telepsychiatry: The future is already present. Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health 2023;16(1):51 View
  55. Burgess A, Wahid S, Ottman K, Kieling C, Mondelli V, Kohrt B, Fisher H. Detection of risk for future depression among adolescents: Stakeholder views of acceptability and feasibility in the United Kingdom. Early Intervention in Psychiatry 2022;16(12):1319 View
  56. Scott S, Knott V, Finlay-Jones A, Mancini V. Australian Psychologists Experiences with Digital Mental Health: a Qualitative Investigation. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science 2022;8(4):341 View
  57. Kilpatrick S, Farmer J, Emery S, Kamstra P, Steiner A, McCosker A, Carlisle K. Community transformed? Exploring the interaction between online support and rural community life for people with acute mental health conditions. Journal of Rural Studies 2023;99:167 View
  58. Isaacs A, Mitchell E, Sutton K, Naughton M, Hine R, Bullock S, Azar D, Maybery D. Clinicians’ and Users’ Views and Experiences of a Tele-Mental Health Service Implemented Alongside the Public Mental Health System during the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2023;20(10):5870 View
  59. Joubert A, Grierson A, Li I, Sharrock M, Moulds M, Werner-Seidler A, Stech E, Mahoney A, Newby J. Managing Rumination and worry: A randomised controlled trial of an internet intervention targeting repetitive negative thinking delivered with and without clinician guidance. Behaviour Research and Therapy 2023;168:104378 View
  60. Ganapathy A, Casey L, Rowland D, Grady A, Veale Sotheren K, Clough B. Methodological approaches in investigating barriers to digital mental health interventions use: a scoping review. Advances in Mental Health 2023:1 View
  61. Berardi C, Antonini M, Jordan Z, Wechtler H, Paolucci F, Hinwood M. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of digital technologies in mental health systems: a qualitative systematic review to inform a policy framework. BMC Health Services Research 2024;24(1) View
  62. Rawnsley C, Stasiak K. Unlocking the Digital Toolbox — A Mixed Methods Survey of New Zealand Mental Health Clinicians’ Knowledge, Use and Attitudes Towards Digital Mental Health Interventions. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science 2024 View
  63. Dominiak M, Gędek A, Antosik A, Mierzejewski P. Mobile health for mental health support: a survey of attitudes and concerns among mental health professionals in Poland over the period 2020-2023. Frontiers in Psychiatry 2024;15 View
  64. Wootton B, McDonald S, Karin E, Titov N, Dear B. Predictors of outcome in self‐guided internet‐delivered cognitive‐behavior therapy for obsessive‐compulsive disorder: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Clinical Psychology 2024;80(9):2014 View
  65. Vila A, Ardoy-Cuadros J, Romero-Moreno R, Nogales-Gonzalez C, Ritchey A, Sansoni M, Riva G. Body, emotions, and sexuality in the metaverse: A randomized control trial exploring the use of second life for an avatar-based intervention to support women with female orgasmic disorder. Computers in Human Behavior 2024;161:108390 View
  66. Vila A, Romero‐Moreno R, Nogales‐Gonzalez C, Ritchey A, Ardoy‐Cuadros J. Sexual Interventions in the Metaverse: Attitudes Towards Novel Therapeutic Approaches, a Qualitative Study. Health Expectations 2024;27(5) View
  67. Ferrao Nunes-Zlotkowski K, Shepherd H, Beatty L, Butow P, Shaw J. Blended Psychological Therapy for the Treatment of Psychological Disorders in Adult Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Interactive Journal of Medical Research 2024;13:e49660 View
  68. Chida A, Hamamoto Y, Hirata K, Sato Y, So E, Kishimoto S, Noguchi S, Horie S, Saito Y, Shimozaki K, Tsugaru K, Togasaki K, Kawasaki K, Hayashi H, Kanai T. The Effectiveness and Feasibility of Palliative Care via Video Telemedicine for Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Nonrandomized Prospective Clinical Trial Comparing Combination of Telemedicine and in-Person Care with in-Person Care Alone. Palliative Medicine Reports 2024;5(1):503 View
  69. Krahe M, Larkins S, Adams N. Digital health implementation in Australia: A scientometric review of the research. DIGITAL HEALTH 2024;10 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Seçkin G. Emotions, Technology, and Health. View
  2. Wootton B, Andersson E, Rück C. Guided Internet-Based Treatments in Psychiatry. View
  3. Abdulnabi Z. Behavioral Emergencies for Healthcare Providers. View
  4. Fox T. Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Diversity and Equity in a Virtual World. View
  5. Clough B, Cassimatis M, Noorbala L, Attary T, Ghazizadeh A, Hamilton K. The Science behind the COVID Pandemic and Healthcare Technology Solutions. View