This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Information Retrieval (287) Quality/Credibility of eHealth Information and Trust Issues (531)

Published on in Vol 15, No 8 (2013): August

A Method for the Design and Development of Medical or Health Care Information Websites to Optimize Search Engine Results Page Rankings on Google

A Method for the Design and Development of Medical or Health Care Information Websites to Optimize Search Engine Results Page Rankings on Google

A Method for the Design and Development of Medical or Health Care Information Websites to Optimize Search Engine Results Page Rankings on Google

Authors of this article:

Suzanne Dunne1 ;   Niamh Maria Cummins1 ;   Ailish Hannigan1, 2 ;   Bill Shannon1 ;   Colum Dunne1, 2 ;   Walter Cullen1, 2
Article Authors Cited by (36) Tweetations (31) Metrics

Journals

  1. Nieroda M, Lophatananon A, McMillan B, Chen L, Hughes J, Daniels R, Clark J, Rogers S, Muir K. Online Decision Support Tool for Personalized Cancer Symptom Checking in the Community (REACT): Acceptability, Feasibility, and Usability Study. JMIR Cancer 2018;4(2):e10073 View
  2. Dunne S, Shannon B, Cullen W, Dunne C. Beliefs, perceptions and behaviours of GPs towards generic medicines. Family Practice 2014;31(4):467 View
  3. Rezniczek G, Küppers L, Heuer H, Hefler L, Buerkle B, Tempfer C. Quality of websites of obstetrics and gynecology departments: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth 2015;15(1) View
  4. Dunne S, Shannon B, Dunne C, Cullen W. Patient Perceptions of Generic Medicines: A Mixed-Methods Study. The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 2014;7(2):177 View
  5. Marsidi N, van den Bergh M, Luijendijk R. Reply. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2014;134(2):334e View
  6. Long L, Leung C, Hong J, Wright C, Young C. Patterns of internet and social media use in colorectal surgery. BMC Surgery 2019;19(1) View
  7. Cheatham S, Stull K. Knowledge of self-myofascial release among allied health students in the United States: A descriptive survey. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies 2018;22(3):713 View
  8. Strzelecki A. Google Medical Update: Why Is the Search Engine Decreasing Visibility of Health and Medical Information Websites?. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020;17(4):1160 View
  9. Patton L, George S, Hollowell R. Content, quality, and readability of website information on dental care for patients with cancer. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology 2014;118(1):78 View
  10. Clancy A, Hickling D, Didomizio L, Sanaee M, Shehata F, Zee R, Khalil H. Patient‐targeted websites on overactive bladder: What are our patients reading?. Neurourology and Urodynamics 2018;37(2):832 View
  11. Bossen D, Kloek C, Snippe H, Dekker J, de Bakker D, Veenhof C. A Blended Intervention for Patients With Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis in the Physical Therapy Practice: Development and a Pilot Study. JMIR Research Protocols 2016;5(1):e32 View
  12. Dunne S, Cummins N, Hannigan A, Shannon B, Dunne C, Cullen W. Generic medicines: an evaluation of the accuracy and accessibility of information available on the internet. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2013;13(1) View
  13. Cheatham S. Roller Massage: A Descriptive Survey of Allied Health Professionals. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 2019;28(6):640 View
  14. Costa N, Nielsen M, Jull G, Claus A, Hodges P. Low back pain websites do not meet the needs of consumers: A study of online resources at three time points. Health Information Management Journal 2020;49(2-3):137 View
  15. Heim N, Faron A, Wilms C, Reich R, Martini M. Lesbarkeit von onlinebasierten Patienteninformationen in der MKG-Chirurgie. Der MKG-Chirurg 2019;12(3):154 View
  16. Heim N, Faron A, Fuchs J, Martini M, Reich R, Löffler K. Die Lesbarkeit von onlinebasierten Patienteninformationen in der Augenheilkunde. Der Ophthalmologe 2017;114(5):450 View
  17. O’Neill S, Glynn D, Murphy K, James K, Twomey M, Kavanagh R, O’Connor O, Maher M. An Assessment of the Quality of CT Radiation Dose Information on the Internet. Journal of the American College of Radiology 2018;15(1):11 View
  18. Bryant J, Mohan R, Koottappillil B, Wong K, Yi P. Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery. Clinical Spine Surgery: A Spine Publication 2018;31(3):E166 View
  19. Dunne S, Cummins N, Hannigan A, Shannon B, Cullen W, Dunne C. What answers does the Internet provide for patients in Ireland with questions about generic medicines?. Journal of Generic Medicines: The Business Journal for the Generic Medicines Sector 2013;10(3-4):205 View
  20. Mellish V. Study of online information for anxious patients requiring dental extractions. British Dental Journal 2019;227(5):399 View
  21. BOYDAK S, Yalçın İLERİ Y. Türkiye’deki Kamu ve Özel Hastane Web Sitelerinin İşleyiş Kalitesi, Güncellik ve Tasarım Altyapısı Bakımından Analizi. AJIT-e Online Academic Journal of Information Technology 2021;12(44):71 View
  22. Paul S, Ahrend M, Lüers J, Roth K, Grimmiger P, Bopp F, Janghorban Esfahani B. Systematic Analysis of Readability of Patient Information on Internet Pages from Departments for Trauma Surgery of German University Hospitals. Zeitschrift für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie 2021;159(02):187 View
  23. Xie M, Young J, May C. Availability and readability of online patient information on clubfoot: Assessment of paediatric hospital clubfoot web pages. Journal of Children's Orthopaedics 2021;15(3):291 View
  24. Tieman J, Lewis V. Benefits of Structured Engagement with Target Audiences of a Health Website: Study Design for a Multi-Case Study. Healthcare 2021;9(5):600 View
  25. Kroon M, Park J. Negative reviews online: an exploratory analysis of patient complaints about dental services in Western Australia. Australian Dental Journal 2022;67(2):138 View
  26. Cheatham S, Baker R, Abdenour T. Kinesiology Tape: A Descriptive Survey of Healthcare Professionals in the United States. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy 2021;16(3) View
  27. Allard N, Orom H. Examining beliefs and information-seeking behaviors of young adults aged 20–39 to help inform cancer prevention communication. Preventive Medicine 2023;166:107353 View
  28. Harden S, Murphy A, Ratliff K, Balis L. Internet Search Results for Older Adult Physical Activity Guidelines: Scoping Review. JMIR Formative Research 2022;6(1):e29153 View
  29. Delungahawatta T, Dunne S, Hyde S, Halpenny L, McGrath D, O’Regan A, Dunne C. Advances in e-learning in undergraduate clinical medicine: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education 2022;22(1) View
  30. Donnell C, Iafrate L, Worthington S. The 'five star' fallacy: an analysis of online reviews and testimonials of dental practices in Northern England. British Dental Journal 2022 View
  31. Cheatham S, Baker R, Behm D, Stull K, Kolber M. Mechanical Percussion Devices: A Survey of Practice Patterns Among Healthcare Professionals. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy 2021;16(3) View
  32. Daynes-Kearney R, Gallagher S. Online Support Groups for Family Caregivers: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e46858 View
  33. Cohen S, Brant A, Fisher A, Pershing S, Do D, Pan C. Dr. Google vs. Dr. ChatGPT: Exploring the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology by Comparing the Accuracy, Safety, and Readability of Responses to Frequently Asked Patient Questions Regarding Cataracts and Cataract Surgery. Seminars in Ophthalmology 2024;39(6):472 View
  34. Cheatham S, Baker R, Batts W, Ambler-Wright T, Sutton B. Exercise With Unstable Objects: A Descriptive Survey Among Health Care and Fitness Professionals. International Journal of Athletic Therapy and Training 2024;29(5):261 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Colditz J, Woods M, Primack B. Technology and Adolescent Mental Health. View