This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Public (e)Health, Digital Epidemiology and Public Health Informatics (725) Web-based and Mobile Health Interventions (3299)

Published on in Vol 15, No 12 (2013): December

Young Men’s Views Toward the Barriers and Facilitators of Internet-Based Chlamydia Trachomatis Screening: Qualitative Study

Young Men’s Views Toward the Barriers and Facilitators of Internet-Based Chlamydia Trachomatis Screening: Qualitative Study

Young Men’s Views Toward the Barriers and Facilitators of Internet-Based Chlamydia Trachomatis Screening: Qualitative Study

Authors of this article:

Karen Lorimer1 ;   Lisa McDaid2
Article Authors Cited by (36) Tweetations (6) Metrics

Journals

  1. Spence T, Kander I, Walsh J, Griffiths F, Ross J. Perceptions and Experiences of Internet-Based Testing for Sexually Transmitted Infections: Systematic Review and Synthesis of Qualitative Research. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(8):e17667 View
  2. Dulai J, Salway T, Thomson K, Haag D, Lachowsky N, Grace D, Edward J, Grennan T, Trussler T, Gilbert M. Awareness of and intention to use an online sexually transmitted and blood-borne infection testing service among gay and bisexual men in British Columbia, two years after implementation. Canadian Journal of Public Health 2021;112(1):78 View
  3. Fuller S, Mercer C, Copas A, Saunders J, Sutcliffe L, Cassell J, Hart G, Johnson A, Roberts T, Jackson L, Muniina P, Estcourt C. The SPORTSMART study: a pilot randomised controlled trial of sexually transmitted infection screening interventions targeting men in football club settings. Sexually Transmitted Infections 2015;91(2):106 View
  4. Barnard S, Free C, Bakolis I, Turner K, Looker K, Baraitser P. Comparing the characteristics of users of an online service for STI self-sampling with clinic service users: a cross-sectional analysis. Sexually Transmitted Infections 2018;94(5):377 View
  5. Moore Z, Angel D, Bjerregaard J, O'Connor T, McGuiness W, Kröger K, Rasmussen B, Yderstrœde K. eHealth in Wound Care: from conception to implementation. Journal of Wound Care 2015;24(Sup5):S1 View
  6. Eaton S, Biggerstaff D, Petrou S, Osipenko L, Gibbs J, Estcourt C, Sadiq T, Szczepura A. Young people’s preferences for the use of emerging technologies for asymptomatic regular chlamydia testing and management: a discrete choice experiment in England. BMJ Open 2019;9(1):e023663 View
  7. Wilson E, Free C, Morris T, Syred J, Ahamed I, Menon-Johansson A, Palmer M, Barnard S, Rezel E, Baraitser P, Broutet N. Internet-accessed sexually transmitted infection (e-STI) testing and results service: A randomised, single-blind, controlled trial. PLOS Medicine 2017;14(12):e1002479 View
  8. Gkatzidou V, Hone K, Sutcliffe L, Gibbs J, Sadiq S, Szczepura A, Sonnenberg P, Estcourt C. User interface design for mobile-based sexual health interventions for young people: Design recommendations from a qualitative study on an online Chlamydia clinical care pathway. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2015;15(1) View
  9. Baraitser P, Syred J, Spencer-Hughes V, Howroyd C, Free C, Holdsworth G. How online sexual health services could work; generating theory to support development. BMC Health Services Research 2015;15(1) View
  10. Spencer-Hughes V, Syred J, Allison A, Holdsworth G, Baraitser P. Screening for Child Sexual Exploitation in Online Sexual Health Services: An Exploratory Study of Expert Views. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(2):e30 View
  11. Söderqvist J, Gullsby K, Stark L, Wikman M, Karlsson R, Herrmann B. Internet-based self-sampling for Chlamydia trachomatis testing: a national evaluation in Sweden. Sexually Transmitted Infections 2020;96(3):160 View
  12. Lohan M, Aventin Á, Oliffe J, Han C, Bottorff J. Knowledge Translation in Men’s Health Research: Development and Delivery of Content for Use Online. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2015;17(1):e31 View
  13. Wilson E, Free C, Morris T, Kenward M, Syred J, Baraitser P. Can Internet-Based Sexual Health Services Increase Diagnoses of Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI)? Protocol for a Randomized Evaluation of an Internet-Based STI Testing and Results Service. JMIR Research Protocols 2016;5(1):e9 View
  14. Mohiuddin S, Gardiner R, Crofts M, Muir P, Steer J, Turner J, Wheeler H, Hollingworth W, Horner P. Modelling patient flows and resource use within a sexual health clinic through discrete event simulation to inform service redesign. BMJ Open 2020;10(7):e037084 View
  15. Aicken C, Fuller S, Sutcliffe L, Estcourt C, Gkatzidou V, Oakeshott P, Hone K, Sadiq S, Sonnenberg P, Shahmanesh M. Young people’s perceptions of smartphone-enabled self-testing and online care for sexually transmitted infections: qualitative interview study. BMC Public Health 2016;16(1) View
  16. Gilbert M, Thomson K, Salway T, Haag D, Grennan T, Fairley C, Buchner C, Krajden M, Kendall P, Shoveller J, Ogilvie G. Differences in experiences of barriers to STI testing between clients of the internet-based diagnostic testing service GetCheckedOnline.com and an STI clinic in Vancouver, Canada. Sexually Transmitted Infections 2019;95(2):151 View
  17. van Liere G, Dukers-Muijrers N, van Bergen J, Götz H, Stals F, Hoebe C. The added value of chlamydia screening between 2008-2010 in reaching young people in addition to chlamydia testing in regular care; an observational study. BMC Infectious Diseases 2014;14(1) View
  18. Knight R, Chabot C, Carson A, Thomson K, Haag D, Gilbert M, Shoveller J. Qualitative analysis of the experiences of gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men who useGetCheckedOnline.com: a comprehensive internet-based diagnostic service for HIV and other STIs. Sexually Transmitted Infections 2019;95(2):145 View
  19. Jones L, Ricketts E, Town K, Rugman C, Lecky D, Folkard K, Nardone A, Hartney T, McNulty C. Chlamydia and HIV testing, contraception advice, and free condoms offered in general practice: a qualitative interview study of young adults’ perceptions of this initiative. British Journal of General Practice 2017;67(660):e490 View
  20. de Wilt T, Versluis A, Goedhart A, Talboom-Kamp E, van Delft S. General practitioners attitude towards the use of eHealth and online testing in primary care. Clinical eHealth 2020;3:16 View
  21. O’Connor S, Hanlon P, O’Donnell C, Garcia S, Glanville J, Mair F. Understanding factors affecting patient and public engagement and recruitment to digital health interventions: a systematic review of qualitative studies. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2016;16(1) View
  22. Wei Y, Zheng P, Deng H, Wang X, Li X, Fu H. Design Features for Improving Mobile Health Intervention User Engagement: Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(12):e21687 View
  23. Day S, Kinsella R, Jones S, Tittle V, Suchak T, Forbes K. Safeguarding outcomes of 16 and 17-year-old service users of Sexual Health London (SHL.uk), a pan-London online sexual health service. International Journal of STD & AIDS 2020;31(14):1373 View
  24. Gasmelsid N, Moran B, Nadarzynski T, Patel R, Foley E. Does online sexually transmitted infection screening compromise care? A service evaluation comparing the management of chlamydial infection diagnosed online and in clinic. International Journal of STD & AIDS 2021;32(6):528 View
  25. Grandahl M, Larsson M, Herrmann B. ‘To be on the safe side’: a qualitative study regarding users’ beliefs and experiences of internet-based self-sampling for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae testing. BMJ Open 2020;10(12):e041340 View
  26. Day S, Singh G, Jones S, Kinsella R. Sexual assault reporting amongst users of online sexual health services. International Journal of STD & AIDS 2021;32(3):280 View
  27. Day S, Khan K, Kelly A, Jones S, Kinsella R. Characteristics of newly diagnosed HIV-positive service users using a pan-London e-sexually transmitted infection screening service. International Journal of STD & AIDS 2021;32(11):1036 View
  28. Rea S, Zynda A, Allison B, Tolleson-Rinehart S. Adolescent Perceptions of Technology-Based Sexual and Reproductive Health Services: A Systematic Review. Journal of Adolescent Health 2022;71(5):533 View
  29. Wilson E, Leyrat C, Baraitser P, Free C. Does internet-accessed STI (e-STI) testing increase testing uptake for chlamydia and other STIs among a young population who have never tested? Secondary analyses of data from a randomised controlled trial. Sexually Transmitted Infections 2019;95(8):569 View
  30. Jiang T, Han Y, Cao N, Yin Y, Chen X. Knowledge on Chlamydia trachomatis and acceptance to testing for it among young students in China. Sexually Transmitted Diseases 2022 View
  31. Ahmaro L, Lindsey L, Forrest S, Whittlesea C. Young people’s perceptions of accessing a community pharmacy for a chlamydia testing kit: a qualitative study based in North East England. BMJ Open 2021;11(9):e052228 View
  32. Zimbile F, David S, Daemen M, Goossens A, Creemers J, Crutzen R. Introducing video consultations at public sexual health clinics in the Netherlands: a mixed-methods study. Health Promotion International 2022;37(5) View
  33. Lattie E, Cohen K, Hersch E, Williams K, Kruzan K, MacIver C, Hermes J, Maddi K, Kwasny M, Mohr D. Uptake and effectiveness of a self-guided mobile app platform for college student mental health. Internet Interventions 2022;27:100493 View
  34. d’Entremont-Harris M, MacNabb K, Wilby K, Ramsey T. Pharmacy-based sexually transmitted infection service implementation considerations: A scoping review. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association 2024;64(1):186 View
  35. Spence T, Howarth A, Reid D, Sheringham J, Apea V, Crundwell D, Day S, Dewsnap C, Jackson L, Mercer C, Mohammed H, Ross J, Sullivan A, Williams A, Winter A, Wong G, Burns F, Gibbs J. How does online postal self-sampling (OPSS) shape access to testing for sexually transmitted infections (STIs)? A qualitative study of service users. BMC Public Health 2024;24(1) View
  36. Rezaee R, Ghaffari M, Rabiei R, Kavousi A, Rakhshanderou S. Requirements and Key Features of a Mobile Application for Adolescent Self-Care From a Stakeholders Perspective: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Prevention 2024;45(6):861 View