Published on in Vol 15, No 11 (2013): November

The Good, Bad, and Ugly of Online Recruitment of Parents for Health-Related Focus Groups: Lessons Learned

The Good, Bad, and Ugly of Online Recruitment of Parents for Health-Related Focus Groups: Lessons Learned

The Good, Bad, and Ugly of Online Recruitment of Parents for Health-Related Focus Groups: Lessons Learned

Journals

  1. Mitchell J, Chavanduka T, Sullivan S, Stephenson R. Recommendations From a Descriptive Evaluation to Improve Screening Procedures for Web-Based Studies With Couples: Cross-Sectional Study. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 2020;6(2):e15079 View
  2. Wolvers M, Bruggeman-Everts F, Van der Lee M, Van de Schoot R, Vollenbroek-Hutten M. Effectiveness, Mediators, and Effect Predictors of Internet Interventions for Chronic Cancer-Related Fatigue: The Design and an Analysis Plan of a 3-Armed Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Research Protocols 2015;4(2):e77 View
  3. Leach L, Bennetts S, Giallo R, Cooklin A. Recruiting fathers for parenting research using online advertising campaigns: Evidence from an Australian study. Child: Care, Health and Development 2019;45(6):871 View
  4. Gu L, Skierkowski D, Florin P, Friend K, Ye Y. Facebook, Twitter, & Qr codes: An exploratory trial examining the feasibility of social media mechanisms for sample recruitment. Computers in Human Behavior 2016;60:86 View
  5. Topolovec-Vranic J, Natarajan K. The Use of Social Media in Recruitment for Medical Research Studies: A Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(11):e286 View
  6. Mitchell J, Lee J, Stephenson R. How Best to Obtain Valid, Verifiable Data Online From Male Couples? Lessons Learned From an eHealth HIV Prevention Intervention for HIV-Negative Male Couples. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 2016;2(2):e152 View
  7. Ballard A, Cardwell T, Young A. Fraud Detection Protocol for Web-Based Research Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: Development and Descriptive Evaluation. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 2019;5(1):e12344 View
  8. MacDougall D, Crowe L, Pereira J, Kwong J, Quach S, Wormsbecker A, Ramsay H, Salvadori M, Russell M. Parental perceptions of school-based influenza immunisation in Ontario, Canada: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2014;4(6):e005189 View
  9. Cavallo D, Lim R, Ishler K, Pagano M, Perovsek R, Albert E, Koopman Gonzalez S, Trapl E, Flocke S. Effectiveness of Social Media Approaches to Recruiting Young Adult Cigarillo Smokers: Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(7):e12619 View
  10. Thornton L, Batterham P, Fassnacht D, Kay-Lambkin F, Calear A, Hunt S. Recruiting for health, medical or psychosocial research using Facebook: Systematic review. Internet Interventions 2016;4:72 View
  11. Hendricks S, Düking P, Mellalieu S. Twitter Strategies for Web-Based Surveying: Descriptive Analysis From the International Concussion Study. JMIR Research Protocols 2016;5(3):e179 View
  12. MacDonnell K, Cowen E, Cunningham D, Ritterband L, Ingersoll K. Online recruitment of a non-help-seeking sample for an internet intervention: Lessons learned in an alcohol-exposed pregnancy risk reduction study. Internet Interventions 2019;17:100240 View
  13. Arnet I, Gudka S, Salter S, Hersberger K, Clifford R. Readiness of pharmacists and consumers for pharmacy-based chlamydia screening in Australia and Switzerland. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare 2018;16:138 View
  14. Waring M, Schneider K, Appelhans B, Simas T, Xiao R, Whited M, Busch A, Evans M, Pagoto S. Interest in a Twitter-delivered weight loss program among women of childbearing age. Translational Behavioral Medicine 2016;6(2):277 View
  15. Roberts J, Morella K, Dawley E, Madden C, Jacobson R, Pope C, Davis B, Thompson D, O'Brien E, Darden P. Direct-to-adolescent text messaging for vaccine reminders: What will parents permit?. Vaccine 2018;36(20):2788 View
  16. Cahill T, Wertz B, Zhong Q, Parlato A, Donegan J, Forman R, Manot S, Wu T, Xu Y, Cummings J, Norkunas Cunningham T, Wang C. The Search for Consumers of Web-Based Raw DNA Interpretation Services: Using Social Media to Target Hard-to-Reach Populations. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(7):e12980 View
  17. Juraschek S, Plante T, Charleston J, Miller E, Yeh H, Appel L, Jerome G, Gayles D, Durkin N, White K, Dalcin A, Hermosilla M. Use of online recruitment strategies in a randomized trial of cancer survivors. Clinical Trials 2018;15(2):130 View
  18. Tustin J, Crowcroft N, Gesink D, Johnson I, Keelan J, Lachapelle B. Facebook Recruitment of Vaccine-Hesitant Canadian Parents: Cross-Sectional Study. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 2017;3(3):e47 View
  19. Dyson M, Shave K, Fernandes R, Scott S, Hartling L. Outcomes in Child Health: Exploring the Use of Social Media to Engage Parents in Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(3):e78 View
  20. Dumas A, Lemieux S, Lapointe A, Provencher V, Robitaille J, Desroches S. Recruitment and retention of mothers of preschoolers and school-aged children in a social media-delivered healthy eating intervention: lessons learned from a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2020;21(1) View
  21. Wasilewski M, Stinson J, Webster F, Cameron J. Using Twitter to recruit participants for health research: An example from a caregiving study. Health Informatics Journal 2019;25(4):1485 View
  22. Kim M, Lee H, Allison J. Challenges and Lessons Learned From a Mobile Health, Web-Based Human Papillomavirus Intervention for Female Korean American College Students: Feasibility Experimental Study. JMIR Formative Research 2020;4(1):e14111 View
  23. Barratt M, Potter G, Wouters M, Wilkins C, Werse B, Perälä J, Pedersen M, Nguyen H, Malm A, Lenton S, Korf D, Klein A, Heyde J, Hakkarainen P, Frank V, Decorte T, Bouchard M, Blok T. Lessons from conducting trans-national Internet-mediated participatory research with hidden populations of cannabis cultivators. International Journal of Drug Policy 2015;26(3):238 View
  24. Yuan P, Bare M, Johnson M, Saberi P. Using Online Social Media for Recruitment of Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Positive Participants: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(5):e117 View
  25. Sun L, Sun Z, Wu L, Zhu Z, Zhang F, Shang Z, Jia Y, Gu J, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Liu N, Liu W. Prevalence and risk factors for acute posttraumatic stress disorder during the COVID-19 outbreak. Journal of Affective Disorders 2021;283:123 View
  26. Waling A, Lyons A, Alba B, Minichiello V, Barrett C, Hughes M, Fredriksen-Goldsen K. Recruiting stigmatised populations and managing negative commentary via social media: a case study of recruiting older LGBTI research participants in Australia. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2022;25(2):157 View
  27. Lander J, Curbach J, von Sommoggy J, Bitzer E, Dierks M. Awareness, Information-Seeking Behavior, and Information Preferences About Early Childhood Allergy Prevention Among Different Parent Groups: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Research Protocols 2021;10(1):e25474 View
  28. Smith R, Alvarez C, Crixell S, Lane M. The Food, Feelings, and Family Study: comparison of the efficacy of traditional methods, social media, and broadcast email to recruit pregnant women to an observational, longitudinal nutrition study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2021;21(1) View
  29. Camara-Medeiros A, Diemert L, O'Connor S, Schwartz R, Eissenberg T, Cohen J. Perceived addiction to vaping among youth and young adult regular vapers. Tobacco Control 2021;30(3):273 View
  30. Lovell H, Harris J. A survey exploring women's use of mobile apps in labour in the United Kingdom. Midwifery 2021;100:103041 View
  31. Bybee S, Cloyes K, Baucom B, Supiano K, Mooney K, Ellington L. Bots and nots: safeguarding online survey research with underrepresented and diverse populations. Psychology & Sexuality 2022;13(4):901 View
  32. Vu M, Huynh V, Bednarczyk R, Escoffery C, Ta D, Nguyen T, Berg C, Pikhart M. Experience and lessons learned from multi-modal internet-based recruitment of U.S. Vietnamese into research. PLOS ONE 2021;16(8):e0256074 View
  33. Garrido‐Hernansaiz H. The use of online social media for the recruitment of people living with HIV in Spain and Latin America: Lessons from two studies. Health & Social Care in the Community 2022;30(6) View
  34. Parker P, McSweeney J, Hadden K, Hess K. Revising Recruitment for Focus Groups to Meet Shifting Needs During COVID-19. Nursing Research 2022;71(2):158 View
  35. Miller H, Plante T, Gleason K, Charleston J, Mitchell C, Miller E, Appel L, Juraschek S. A/B design testing of a clinical trial recruitment website: A pilot study to enhance the enrollment of older adults. Contemporary Clinical Trials 2021;111:106598 View
  36. Renner R, Ennis M, Maazi M, Dunn S, Norman W, Kaczorowski J, Guilbert E. Development and pilot testing of the 2019 Canadian Abortion Provider Survey. Pilot and Feasibility Studies 2023;9(1) View
  37. Loebenberg G, Oldham M, Brown J, Dinu L, Michie S, Field M, Greaves F, Garnett C. Bot or Not? Detecting and Managing Participant Deception When Conducting Digital Research Remotely: Case Study of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e46523 View
  38. O’Brien J, Trumbell J, O’Brien A, Fischer C. Pivots and Partnerships: Successes, Challenges, and Lessons Learned From Conducting Research During a Global Pandemic. Violence Against Women 2023 View
  39. Bergenfeld I, Anderson K, Trang Q, Cheong Y, Minh T, Hoover A, Yount K. Development of the Vietnamese Rape Myths Acceptance Scales: A Web-Based Survey of Young Adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior 2024;53(7):2629 View
  40. Al-Motiri N, Khan S, Khan A. Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Study of Laboratory Staff Toward Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus. Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine 2021;4(1):25 View
  41. Thompson A, Utz R. Online surveys: lessons learned in detecting and protecting against insincerity and bots. Quality & Quantity 2024 View