This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Mobile Health (mhealth) (2939)

Published on in Vol 15, No 10 (2013): October

Interpretive Flexibility in Mobile Health: Lessons From a Government-Sponsored Home Care Program

Interpretive Flexibility in Mobile Health: Lessons From a Government-Sponsored Home Care Program

Interpretive Flexibility in Mobile Health: Lessons From a Government-Sponsored Home Care Program

Authors of this article:

Jeppe Agger Nielsen1 ;   Lars Mathiassen2
Article Authors Cited by (15) Tweetations (10) Metrics

Journals

  1. Matthew-Maich N, Harris L, Ploeg J, Markle-Reid M, Valaitis R, Ibrahim S, Gafni A, Isaacs S. Designing, Implementing, and Evaluating Mobile Health Technologies for Managing Chronic Conditions in Older Adults: A Scoping Review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2016;4(2):e29 View
  2. Rydenfält C, Holgersson C, Östlund B, Arvidsson I, Johansson G, Persson R. Picking low hanging fruit – A scoping review of work environment related interventions in the home care sector. Home Health Care Services Quarterly 2020;39(4):223 View
  3. Bally E, Cesuroglu T. Toward Integration of mHealth in Primary Care in the Netherlands: A Qualitative Analysis of Stakeholder Perspectives. Frontiers in Public Health 2020;7 View
  4. Kip H, Kelders S, Bouman Y, van Gemert-Pijnen L. The Importance of Systematically Reporting and Reflecting on eHealth Development: Participatory Development Process of a Virtual Reality Application for Forensic Mental Health Care. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(8):e12972 View
  5. Granja C, Janssen W, Johansen M. Factors Determining the Success and Failure of eHealth Interventions: Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(5):e10235 View
  6. Kip H, Kelders S, Weerink K, Kuiper A, Brüninghoff I, Bouman Y, Dijkslag D, van Gemert-Pijnen L. Identifying the Added Value of Virtual Reality for Treatment in Forensic Mental Health: A Scenario-Based, Qualitative Approach. Frontiers in Psychology 2019;10 View
  7. Sheng Z, Wang J, Sun K, Xu Q, Zhou H, Liu C, Hu J, Song X, Dong L, Yuan C. Nurses' Attitudes Toward Internet-Based Home Care. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 2021;39(2):97 View
  8. Frennert S, Petersson L, Muhic M, Rydenfält C, Nymberg V, Ekman B, Erlingsdottir G. Materiality and the mediating roles of eHealth: A qualitative study and comparison of three cases. DIGITAL HEALTH 2022;8:205520762211167 View
  9. Franke A, Nass E, Piereth A, Zettl A, Heidl C. Implementation of Assistive Technologies and Robotics in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Three-Stage Assessment Based on Acceptance, Ethics, and Emotions. Frontiers in Psychology 2021;12 View
  10. Mathijssen E, de Lange W, Bleijenberg N, van Houwelingen T, Jaarsma T, Trappenburg J, Westland H. Factors That Influence the Use of eHealth in Home Care: Scoping Review and Cross-sectional Survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e41768 View
  11. Shao Q, Ma J, Zhu S. A System Dynamics Approach for Evaluating the Synergy Degree of Social Organizations Participating in Community and Home-Based Elderly Care Services. Buildings 2022;12(9):1491 View
  12. Munson A. What a mediminder does: Arranging autonomy through technology. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health 2022;2:100149 View
  13. Pandey J, Majumdarr S, Hassan Y, Benuyenah V. Role of Digital Leadership Capability in Shaping IT Innovation. Journal of Global Information Management 2023;31(8):1 View
  14. Kip H, Beerlage-de Jong N, van Gemert-Pijnen L, Kelders S. The CeHRes Roadmap 2.0: an update of a holistic framework for development, implementation, and evaluation of eHealth technologies (Preprint). Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024 View