This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Consumer & Patient Education and Shared-Decision Making (679)

Published on in Vol 14, No 4 (2012): Jul-Aug

Animated Graphics for Comparing Two Risks: A Cautionary Tale

Animated Graphics for Comparing Two Risks: A Cautionary Tale

Animated Graphics for Comparing Two Risks: A Cautionary Tale

Authors of this article:

Brian J Zikmund-Fisher1, 2, 3, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Holly O Witteman3 ;   Andrea Fuhrel-Forbis3 ;   Nicole L Exe3 ;   Valerie C Kahn3 ;   Mark Dickson3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (38) Tweetations (17) Metrics

Journals

  1. Witteman H, Fuhrel-Forbis A, Wijeysundera H, Exe N, Dickson M, Holtzman L, Kahn V, Zikmund-Fisher B. Animated Randomness, Avatars, Movement, and Personalization in Risk Graphics. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(3):e80 View
  2. Melnick E, Probst M, Schoenfeld E, Collins S, Breslin M, Walsh C, Kuppermann N, Dunn P, Abella B, Boatright D, Hess E, Jang T. Development and Testing of Shared Decision Making Interventions for Use in Emergency Care: A Research Agenda. Academic Emergency Medicine 2016;23(12):1346 View
  3. Comello M, Qian X, Deal A, Ribisl K, Linnan L, Tate D. Impact of Game-Inspired Infographics on User Engagement and Information Processing in an eHealth Program. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(9):e237 View
  4. Mavletova A, Gavrilov K, Tholmogorova T. Gamifying a web survey among adolescents: effects on understanding of risk, risk calculation, and ratio-bias. Journal of Risk Research 2019;22(12):1532 View
  5. Gibson J, Rowe A, Stone E, Bruine de Bruin W. Communicating Quantitative Information About Unexploded Ordnance Risks to the Public. Environmental Science & Technology 2013;47(9):4004 View
  6. Zikmund-Fisher B, Witteman H, Dickson M, Fuhrel-Forbis A, Kahn V, Exe N, Valerio M, Holtzman L, Scherer L, Fagerlin A. Blocks, Ovals, or People? Icon Type Affects Risk Perceptions and Recall of Pictographs. Medical Decision Making 2014;34(4):443 View
  7. Wolpin S, Halpenny B, Sorrentino E, Stewart M, McReynolds J, Cvitkovic I, Chang P, Berry D. Usability Testing the “Personal Patient Profile–Prostate” in a Sample of African American and Hispanic Men. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 2016;34(7):288 View
  8. Lor M, Koleck T, Bakken S. Information visualizations of symptom information for patients and providers: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2019;26(2):162 View
  9. Garcia-Retamero R, Cokely E. Designing Visual Aids That Promote Risk Literacy: A Systematic Review of Health Research and Evidence-Based Design Heuristics. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2017;59(4):582 View
  10. Barclay P, Bowers C. Design for the Illiterate: A Scoping Review of Tools for Improving the Health Literacy of Electronic Health Resources. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2017;61(1):545 View
  11. Housten A, Kamath G, Bevers T, Cantor S, Dixon N, Hite A, Kallen M, Leal V, Li L, Volk R. Does Animation Improve Comprehension of Risk Information in Patients with Low Health Literacy? A Randomized Trial. Medical Decision Making 2020;40(1):17 View
  12. Klein K, Watson L, Ash J, Eden K. Evaluation of risk communication in a mammography patient decision aid. Patient Education and Counseling 2016;99(7):1240 View
  13. Kasper J, van de Roemer A, Pöttgen J, Rahn A, Backhus I, Bay Y, Köpke S, Heesen C. A new graphical format to communicate treatment effects to patients—A web‐based randomized controlled trial. Health Expectations 2017;20(4):797 View
  14. Trevena L, Zikmund-Fisher B, Edwards A, Gaissmaier W, Galesic M, Han P, King J, Lawson M, Linder S, Lipkus I, Ozanne E, Peters E, Timmermans D, Woloshin S. Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2013;13(S2) View
  15. Garcia-Retamero R, Cokely E, Ghazal S, Joeris A. Measuring Graph Literacy without a Test. Medical Decision Making 2016;36(7):854 View
  16. Fagerlin A, Valley T, Scherer A, Knaus M, Das E, Zikmund-Fisher B. Communicating infectious disease prevalence through graphics: Results from an international survey. Vaccine 2017;35(32):4041 View
  17. Spiegelhalter D. Risk and Uncertainty Communication. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application 2017;4(1):31 View
  18. Stellamanns J, Ruetters D, Dahal K, Schillmoeller Z, Huebner J. Visualizing risks in cancer communication: A systematic review of computer-supported visual aids. Patient Education and Counseling 2017;100(8):1421 View
  19. Shaffer V, Wegier P, Valentine K, Belden J, Canfield S, Patil S, Popescu M, Steege L, Jain A, Koopman R. Patient Judgments About Hypertension Control: The Role of Variability, Trends, and Outliers in Visualized Blood Pressure Data. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(3):e11366 View
  20. Watson I. A patient focused relationship for specialists in laboratory medicine. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) 2019;57(3):383 View
  21. Trevena L, Bonner C, Okan Y, Peters E, Gaissmaier W, Han P, Ozanne E, Timmermans D, Zikmund-Fisher B. Current Challenges When Using Numbers in Patient Decision Aids: Advanced Concepts. Medical Decision Making 2021;41(7):834 View
  22. Alizadeh M, Hamilton M, Jones P, Ma J, Jaradat R. Vehicle operating state anomaly detection and results virtual reality interpretation. Expert Systems with Applications 2021;177:114928 View
  23. Strikwerda J, Holleman B, Hoeken H. Designing pension communication. Information Design Journal 2021;26(3):260 View
  24. Li H, Chen C. Effects of Affordance State and Operation Mode on a Smart Washing Machine Touch Sensitive User Interface Design. IEEE Sensors Journal 2021;21(19):21956 View
  25. Knapp P, Benhebil N, Evans E, Moe-Byrne T. The effectiveness of video animations in the education of healthcare practitioners and student practitioners: a systematic review of trials. Perspectives on Medical Education 2022;11(6):309 View
  26. Fanio J, Zeng E, Wang B, Slotwiner D, Reading Turchioe M. Designing for patient decision-making: Design challenges generated by patients with atrial fibrillation during evaluation of a decision aid prototype. Frontiers in Digital Health 2023;4 View
  27. Franconeri S, Padilla L, Shah P, Zacks J, Hullman J. The Science of Visual Data Communication: What Works. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 2021;22(3):110 View
  28. Hoonakker J, Adeline-Duflot F, Orcel V, Grudzinski M, Cognet M, Renard V. Use of visual aids in general practice consultations: A questionnaire-based survey. PEC Innovation 2023;2:100159 View
  29. Riera R, de Oliveira Cruz Latorraca C, Padovez R, Pacheco R, Romão D, Barreto J, Machado M, Gomes R, da Silva S, Martimbianco A. Strategies for communicating scientific evidence on healthcare to managers and the population: a scoping review. Health Research Policy and Systems 2023;21(1) View
  30. Ancker J, Benda N, Zikmund-Fisher B. Insufficient evidence for interactive or animated graphics for communicating probability. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2024;31(11):2760 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Krishnamurti T, Bruine de Bruin W. Psychological Perspectives on Risk and Risk Analysis. View
  2. Padilla L, Kay M, Hullman J. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online. View
  3. Wang L, Zheng M. Advances in Usability, User Experience, Wearable and Assistive Technology. View
  4. Li H, Chen C. HCI in Games. View
  5. Reyna V, Brust-Renck P. Numerical Reasoning in Judgments and Decision Making about Health. View
  6. Multmeier J, Gaissmaier W, Wegwarth O. Numerical Reasoning in Judgments and Decision Making about Health. View