Published on in Vol 14, No 1 (2012): Jan-Feb

Acceptability and Preliminary Feasibility of an Internet/CD-ROM-Based Education and Decision Program for Early-Stage Prostate Cancer Patients: Randomized Pilot Study

Acceptability and Preliminary Feasibility of an Internet/CD-ROM-Based Education and Decision Program for Early-Stage Prostate Cancer Patients: Randomized Pilot Study

Acceptability and Preliminary Feasibility of an Internet/CD-ROM-Based Education and Decision Program for Early-Stage Prostate Cancer Patients: Randomized Pilot Study

Journals

  1. Badr H, Carmack C, Diefenbach M. Psychosocial Interventions for Patients and Caregivers in the Age of New Communication Technologies: Opportunities and Challenges in Cancer Care. Journal of Health Communication 2015;20(3):328 View
  2. Forbes C, Finlay A, McIntosh M, Siddiquee S, Short C. A systematic review of the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of online supportive care interventions targeting men with a history of prostate cancer. Journal of Cancer Survivorship 2019;13(1):75 View
  3. Miller S, Hudson S, Hui S, Diefenbach M, Fleisher L, Raivitch S, Belton T, Roy G, Njoku A, Scarpato J, Viterbo R, Buyyounouski M, Denlinger C, Miyamoto C, Reese A, Baman J. Development and preliminary testing of PROGRESS: a Web-based education program for prostate cancer survivors transitioning from active treatment. Journal of Cancer Survivorship 2015;9(3):541 View
  4. Baumel A, Tinkelman A, Mathur N, Kane J. Digital Peer-Support Platform (7Cups) as an Adjunct Treatment for Women With Postpartum Depression: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Efficacy Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2018;6(2):e38 View
  5. Diefenbach M, Benedict C, Miller S, Stanton A, Ropka M, Wen K, Fleisher L, Mohamed N, Hall S. Examining the impact of a multimedia intervention on treatment decision-making among newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients: results from a nationwide RCT. Translational Behavioral Medicine 2018;8(6):876 View
  6. Song L, Tyler C, Clayton M, Rodgiriguez-Rassi E, Hill L, Bai J, Pruthi R, Bailey D. Patient and family communication during consultation visits: The effects of a decision aid for treatment decision-making for localized prostate cancer. Patient Education and Counseling 2017;100(2):267 View
  7. Ventura F, Öhlén J, Koinberg I. An integrative review of supportive e-health programs in cancer care. European Journal of Oncology Nursing 2013;17(4):498 View
  8. Roussi P, Miller S. Monitoring style of coping with cancer related threats: a review of the literature. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 2014;37(5):931 View
  9. García-Cruz E, Romero-Otero J, Fode M, Alcaraz A. The digital environment in men's sexual disorders: A systematic review. Actas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition) 2018;42(6):365 View
  10. Garzón-Orjuela N, Sánchez Bello N, Bonilla Mahecha L, Moreno Hernández L, Suárez Ángel M, Murcia Ardila N, Luque Angulo S, Eslava-Schmalbach J. Effectiveness of knowledge translation strategies in audiovisual language compared with other languages to improve health outcomes in individuals and the general population: sSystematic review. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría (English ed.) 2019;48(2):105 View
  11. Stacey D, Légaré F, Lewis K, Barry M, Bennett C, Eden K, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Thomson R, Trevena L. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017;2017(4) View
  12. D’Souza V, Blouin E, Zeitouni A, Muller K, Allison P. An investigation of the effect of tailored information on symptoms of anxiety and depression in Head and Neck cancer patients. Oral Oncology 2013;49(5):431 View
  13. Groeben C, Streuli J, Krones T, Keck B, Wirth M, Huber J. Therapie des nichtmetastasierten Prostatakarzinoms. Der Urologe 2014;53(6):854 View
  14. Violette P, Agoritsas T, Alexander P, Riikonen J, Santti H, Agarwal A, Bhatnagar N, Dahm P, Montori V, Guyatt G, Tikkinen K. Decision aids for localized prostate cancer treatment choice: Systematic review and meta‐analysis. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2015;65(3):239 View
  15. Zhong W, Haghighi K, Rathore P, Wong E, Mancuso P. A standardized analysis of the current surgical and non-surgical treatment selection process for men with localized prostate cancer. Journal of Robotic Surgery 2018;12(2):215 View
  16. Martin R, Hardy K, Kumar P. The quality of patient preparation for exenterative surgery. Gastrointestinal Nursing 2020;18(1):22 View
  17. Baumunk D, Reunkoff R, Kushner J, Baumunk A, Kempkensteffen C, Steiner U, Weikert S, Moser L, Schrader M, Höcht S, Wiegel T, Miller K, Schostak M. Interdisciplinary decision making in prostate cancer therapy – 5-years’ time trends at the Interdisciplinary Prostate Cancer Center (IPC) of the Charité Berlin. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2013;13(1) View
  18. Garzón-Orjuela N, Sánchez Bello N, Bonilla Mahecha L, Moreno Hernández L, Suárez Ángel M, Murcia Ardila N, Luque Angulo S, Eslava-Schmalbach J. Efectividad de las estrategias de transferencia de conocimiento en lenguaje audiovisual comparadas con otras para mejorar desenlaces en la salud individual y de la población general: revisión sistemática. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría 2019;48(2):105 View
  19. Chambers S, Hyde M, Smith D, Hughes S, Yuill S, Egger S, O'Connell D, Stein K, Frydenberg M, Wittert G, Dunn J. New Challenges in Psycho-Oncology Research III: A systematic review of psychological interventions for prostate cancer survivors and their partners: clinical and research implications. Psycho-Oncology 2017;26(7):873 View
  20. Arora M, Gerbert B, Potter M, Gildengorin G, Walsh J. PreView: Development and Pilot Testing of an Interactive Video Doctor Plus Provider Alert to Increase Cancer Screening. ISRN Preventive Medicine 2013;2013:1 View
  21. Bártolo A, Pacheco E, Rodrigues F, Pereira A, Monteiro S, Santos I. Effectiveness of psycho-educational interventions with telecommunication technologies on emotional distress and quality of life of adult cancer patients: a systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation 2019;41(8):870 View
  22. Leach C, Diefenbach M, Fleszar S, Alfano C, Stephens R, Riehman K, Hudson S. A user centered design approach to development of an online self‐management program for cancer survivors: Springboard Beyond Cancer. Psycho-Oncology 2019;28(10):2060 View
  23. Larentis A, Barbosa D, da Silva C, Barbosa J. Applied Computing to Education on Noncommunicable Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Mapping Study. Telemedicine and e-Health 2020;26(2):147 View
  24. McAlpine H, Joubert L, Martin-Sanchez F, Merolli M, Drummond K. A systematic review of types and efficacy of online interventions for cancer patients. Patient Education and Counseling 2015;98(3):283 View
  25. Zhong W, Smith B, Haghighi K, Mancuso P. Systematic Review of Decision Aids for the Management of Men With Localized Prostate Cancer. Urology 2018;114:1 View
  26. Housten A, Kamath G, Bevers T, Cantor S, Dixon N, Hite A, Kallen M, Leal V, Li L, Volk R. Does Animation Improve Comprehension of Risk Information in Patients with Low Health Literacy? A Randomized Trial. Medical Decision Making 2020;40(1):17 View
  27. Groen W, Kuijpers W, Oldenburg H, Wouters M, Aaronson N, van Harten W. Empowerment of Cancer Survivors Through Information Technology: An Integrative Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2015;17(11):e270 View
  28. García-Cruz E, Romero-Otero J, Fode M, Alcaraz A. El entorno digital en los trastornos sexuales masculinos: revisión sistemática. Actas Urológicas Españolas 2018;42(6):365 View
  29. Harik J, Grubbs K, Hamblen J. Retracted: The Impact of Treatment Description Format on Patient Preferences for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Treatment. Journal of Traumatic Stress 2020;33(4):455 View
  30. Collée G, van der Wilk B, van Lanschot J, Busschbach J, Timmermans L, Lagarde S, Kranenburg L. Interventions that Facilitate Shared Decision-Making in Cancers with Active Surveillance as Treatment Option: a Systematic Review of Literature. Current Oncology Reports 2020;22(10) View
  31. Teckie S, Solomon J, Kadapa K, Sanchez K, Orner D, Kraus D, Kamdar D, Pereira L, Frank D, Diefenbach M. A Mobile Patient-Facing App for Tracking Patient-Reported Outcomes in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors: Single-Arm Feasibility Study. JMIR Formative Research 2021;5(3):e24667 View
  32. Grüne B, Kriegmair M, Lenhart M, Michel M, Huber J, Köther A, Büdenbender B, Alpers G. Decision Aids for Shared Decision-making in Uro-oncology: A Systematic Review. European Urology Focus 2022;8(3):851 View
  33. Fagerlin A, Holmes-Rovner M, Hofer T, Rovner D, Alexander S, Knight S, Ling B, A.Tulsky J, Wei J, Hafez K, Kahn V, Connochie D, Gingrich J, Ubel P. Head to head randomized trial of two decision aids for prostate cancer. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2021;21(1) View
  34. Lamers R, Cuypers M, de Vries M, van de Poll-Franse L, Bosch J, Kil P. Differences in treatment choices between prostate cancer patients using a decision aid and patients receiving care as usual: results from a randomized controlled trial. World Journal of Urology 2021;39(12):4327 View
  35. Eiriksdottir V, Jonsdottir T, Valdimarsdottir H, Taylor K, Schwartz M, Hilmarsson R, Gudmundsson E, Fridriksson J, Baldursdottir B. An Adaptation, Extension and Pre-Testing of an Interactive Decision Aid for Men Diagnosed with Localized Prostate Cancer in Iceland: A Mixed-Method Study. Behavioral Medicine 2023;49(2):137 View
  36. Todio E, Sharp J, Morrow A, Taylor N, Schofield P, Mazariego C. Examining the effectiveness and implementation of patient treatment decision‐aid tools for men with localised prostate cancer: A systematic review. Psycho-Oncology 2023;32(4):469 View
  37. Marziliano A, Diefenbach M, Hudson S, Tagai E, Handorf E, Bator A, Miller S. Demographic and Psychosocial Characteristics Associated With Use of a Prostate Cancer Survivorship Website: Implications From a Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2022;24(3):e27890 View
  38. Lee K, Kim S, Kim S, Yoo S, Sung J, Oh E, Kim N, Lee J. Digital Health Interventions for Adult Patients With Cancer Evaluated in Randomized Controlled Trials: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e38333 View
  39. Wheelwright S, Maunsell R, Taylor S, Drinkwater N, Erridge C, Foster C, Hardcastle M, Hogden A, Lawson I, Lisiecka D, McDermott C, Morrison K, Muir C, Recio-Saucedo A, White S. Development of ‘gastrostomy tube – is it for me?’, a web-based patient decision aid for people living with motor neurone disease considering having a gastrostomy tube placed. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration 2023;24(7-8):605 View
  40. Marziliano A, Miller S, Fleisher L, Ropka M, Stanton A, Wen K, Cornelius T, Lapitan E, Diefenbach M. Examining the impact of a multimedia intervention on decisional conflict and psychological distress among early-stage breast cancer patients: results from a nationwide RCT. Translational Behavioral Medicine 2023;13(10):727 View
  41. Diefenbach M, Marziliano A, Tagai E, Pfister H, Lapitan E, Hall S, Vira M, Ibrahim S, Aibel K, Kutikov A, Horwitz E, Miyamoto C, Reese A, Miller S. Preference Elicitation and Treatment Decision-Making Among Men Diagnosed With Prostate Cancer: Randomized Controlled Trial Results of Healium. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e46552 View
  42. Stacey D, Lewis K, Smith M, Carley M, Volk R, Douglas E, Pacheco-Brousseau L, Finderup J, Gunderson J, Barry M, Bennett C, Bravo P, Steffensen K, Gogovor A, Graham I, Kelly S, Légaré F, Sondergaard H, Thomson R, Trenaman L, Trevena L. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2024;2024(1) View
  43. Zhang Y, Flannery M, Zhang Z, Underhill-Blazey M, Bobry M, Leblanc N, Rodriguez D, Zhang C. Digital Health Psychosocial Intervention in Adult Patients With Cancer and Their Families: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JMIR Cancer 2024;10:e46116 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Stacey D, Légaré F, Col N, Bennett C, Barry M, Eden K, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Thomson R, Trevena L, Wu J, Stacey D. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. View