This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Electronic/Mobile Data Capture, Internet-based Survey & Research Methodology (832)
Impact of Length or Relevance of Questionnaires on Attrition in Online Trials: Randomized Controlled Trial

Impact of Length or Relevance of Questionnaires on Attrition in Online Trials: Randomized Controlled Trial

Impact of Length or Relevance of Questionnaires on Attrition in Online Trials: Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors of this article:

Jim McCambridge1 ;   Eleftheria Kalaitzaki2 ;   Ian R. White3 ;   Zarnie Khadjesari4 ;   Elizabeth Murray4 Author Orcid Image ;   Stuart Linke4 ;   Simon G. Thompson5 ;   Christine Godfrey6 ;   Paul Wallace7
Article Authors Cited by (58) Tweetations Metrics

Journals

  1. Villanti A, Jacobs M, Zawistowski G, Brookover J, Stanton C, Graham A. Impact of Baseline Assessment Modality on Enrollment and Retention in a Facebook Smoking Cessation Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2015;17(7):e179 View
  2. Batterham P, Calear A, Sunderland M, Carragher N, Brewer J. Online screening and feedback to increase help-seeking for mental health problems: population-based randomised controlled trial. BJPsych Open 2016;2(1):67 View
  3. Han J, Fang M, Ye S, Chen C, Wan Q, Qian X. Using Decision Tree to Predict Response Rates of Consumer Satisfaction, Attitude, and Loyalty Surveys. Sustainability 2019;11(8):2306 View
  4. Friederichs S, Oenema A, Bolman C, Guyaux J, Van Keulen H, Lechner L. Motivational interviewing in a web-based physical activity intervention: questions and reflections. Health Promotion International 2015;30(3):803 View
  5. Van Calster L, D'Argembeau A, Majerus S. Measuring individual differences in internal versus external attention: The attentional style questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences 2018;128:25 View
  6. McCambridge J, Wilson A, Attia J, Weaver N, Kypri K. Randomized trial seeking to induce the Hawthorne effect found no evidence for any effect on self-reported alcohol consumption online. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2019;108:102 View
  7. Ventura F, Sawatzky R, Öhlén J, Karlsson P, Koinberg I. Challenges of evaluating a computer-based educational programme for women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer: a randomised controlled trial. European Journal of Cancer Care 2017;26(5):e12534 View
  8. Fabricant P, Brusalis C, Schachne J, Matava M, Anderson C, Busch M, Chambers H, Christino M, Cordasco F, Edmonds E, Ganley T, Green D, Heyworth B, Kocher M, Lawrence J, Micheli L, Milewski M, Nepple J, Parikh S, Pennock A, Saluan P, Shea K, Wall E, Willimon S. Which Metrics Are Being Used to Evaluate Children and Adolescents After ACL Reconstruction? A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation 2020;2(4):e417 View
  9. Byrd-Bredbenner C, Delaney C, Martin-Biggers J, Koenings M, Quick V. The marketing plan and outcome indicators for recruiting and retaining parents in the HomeStyles randomized controlled trial. Trials 2017;18(1) View
  10. Guo Y, Kopec J, Cibere J, Li L, Goldsmith C. Population Survey Features and Response Rates: A Randomized Experiment. American Journal of Public Health 2016;106(8):1422 View
  11. MacNeill V, Foley M, Quirk A, McCambridge J. Shedding light on research participation effects in behaviour change trials: a qualitative study examining research participant experiences. BMC Public Health 2016;16(1) View
  12. Skea Z, Newlands R, Gillies K. Exploring non-retention in clinical trials: a meta-ethnographic synthesis of studies reporting participant reasons for drop out. BMJ Open 2019;9(6):e021959 View
  13. Robinson H, Appelbe D, Dodd S, Flowers S, Johnson S, Jones S, Mateus C, Mezes B, Murray E, Rainford N, Rosala-Hallas A, Walker A, Williamson P, Lobban F. Methodological Challenges in Web-Based Trials: Update and Insights From the Relatives Education and Coping Toolkit Trial. JMIR Mental Health 2020;7(7):e15878 View
  14. Boogerd E, Maas-Van Schaaijk N, Sas T, Clement-de Boers A, Smallenbroek M, Nuboer R, Noordam C, Verhaak C. Sugarsquare, a Web-Based Patient Portal for Parents of a Child With Type 1 Diabetes: Multicenter Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(8):e287 View
  15. Tielemans M, Jansen J, van Oijen M. Open Access Capture of Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Using an Online Patient-Reported Outcomes Instrument. Interactive Journal of Medical Research 2012;1(5):e7 View
  16. Brueton V, Stenning S, Stevenson F, Tierney J, Rait G. Best practice guidance for the use of strategies to improve retention in randomized trials developed from two consensus workshops. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2017;88:122 View
  17. Hochheimer C, Sabo R, Perera R, Mukhopadhyay N, Krist A. Identifying Attrition Phases in Survey Data: Applicability and Assessment Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(8):e12811 View
  18. Blumenberg C, Menezes A, Gonçalves H, Assunção M, Wehrmeister F, Barros F, Barros A. The role of questionnaire length and reminders frequency on response rates to a web-based epidemiologic study: a randomised trial. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2019;22(6):625 View
  19. Choi M, Kim S, Lee S, Kwon B, Yi J, Choo J, Huh J. Toward Predicting Social Support Needs in Online Health Social Networks. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(8):e272 View
  20. Alshurafa N, Sideris C, Pourhomayoun M, Kalantarian H, Sarrafzadeh M, Eastwood J. Remote Health Monitoring Outcome Success Prediction Using Baseline and First Month Intervention Data. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 2017;21(2):507 View
  21. Grundmann O, Yoon S, Mason S, Smith K. Gastrointestinal symptom improvement from fiber, STW 5, peppermint oil, and probiotics use—Results from an online survey. Complementary Therapies in Medicine 2018;41:225 View
  22. Keusch F. Why do people participate in Web surveys? Applying survey participation theory to Internet survey data collection. Management Review Quarterly 2015;65(3):183 View
  23. Essex H, White I, Khadjesari Z, Linke S, McCambridge J, Murray E, Parrott S, Godfrey C. Quality of life among hazardous and harmful drinkers: EQ-5D over a 1-year follow-up period. Quality of Life Research 2014;23(2):733 View
  24. Murray E, White I, Varagunam M, Godfrey C, Khadjesari Z, McCambridge J. Attrition Revisited: Adherence and Retention in a Web-Based Alcohol Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2013;15(8):e162 View
  25. Hochheimer C, Sabo R, Krist A, Day T, Cyrus J, Woolf S. Methods for Evaluating Respondent Attrition in Web-Based Surveys. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(11):e301 View
  26. Brueton V, Tierney J, Stenning S, Harding S, Meredith S, Nazareth I, Rait G. Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013 View
  27. Conroy D, Sparks P, de Visser R. Efficacy of a non‐drinking mental simulation intervention for reducing student alcohol consumption. British Journal of Health Psychology 2015;20(4):688 View
  28. Hamilton F, Hornby J, Sheringham J, Linke S, Ashton C, Moore K, Stevenson F, Murray E. DIAMOND (DIgital Alcohol Management ON Demand): a mixed methods feasibility RCT and embedded process evaluation of a digital health intervention to reduce hazardous and harmful alcohol use. Pilot and Feasibility Studies 2017;3(1) View
  29. Perski O, Blandford A, West R, Michie S. Conceptualising engagement with digital behaviour change interventions: a systematic review using principles from critical interpretive synthesis. Translational Behavioral Medicine 2017;7(2):254 View
  30. Bendtsen M, Garnett C, Toner P, Shorter G. The Effect of Question Order on Outcomes in the Core Outcome Set for Brief Alcohol Interventions Among Online Help-Seekers: Protocol for a Factorial Randomized Trial. JMIR Research Protocols 2020;9(11):e24175 View
  31. Suppan L, Abbas M, Catho G, Stuby L, Regard S, Harbarth S, Achab S, Suppan M. Impact of a Serious Game on the Intention to Change Infection Prevention and Control Practices in Nursing Homes During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Protocol for a Web-Based Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Research Protocols 2020;9(12):e25595 View
  32. Sturny L, Regard S, Larribau R, Niquille M, Savoldelli G, Sarasin F, Schiffer E, Suppan L. Differences in Basic Life Support Knowledge Between Junior Medical Students and Lay People: Web-Based Questionnaire Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(2):e25125 View
  33. Gillies K, Kearney A, Keenan C, Treweek S, Hudson J, Brueton V, Conway T, Hunter A, Murphy L, Carr P, Rait G, Manson P, Aceves-Martins M. Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2021;2021(4) View
  34. Suppan M, Abbas M, Catho G, Stuby L, Regard S, Achab S, Harbarth S, Suppan L. Impact of a Serious Game (Escape COVID-19) on the Intention to Change COVID-19 Control Practices Among Employees of Long-term Care Facilities: Web-Based Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(3):e27443 View
  35. Brates D, Namasivayam-MacDonald A, Molfenter S. Survey of Clinician Perspectives and Practices Regarding Swallowing-Related Fatigue. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 2021;30(3):1170 View
  36. Rigot S, DiGiovine K, Boninger M, Hibbs R, Smith I, Worobey L. Effectiveness of a Web-Based Direct-to-User Transfer Training Program: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2022;103(4):807 View
  37. Lees J, Hanlon P, Butterly E, Wild S, Mair F, Taylor R, Guthrie B, Gillies K, Dias S, Welton N, McAllister D. Effect of age, sex, and morbidity count on trial attrition: meta-analysis of individual participant level data from phase 3/4 industry funded clinical trials. BMJ Medicine 2022;1(1):e000217 View
  38. Ricci G, Herren T, Taramarcaz V, Schnetzler N, Dupuis F, Schiffer E, Suppan M, Suppan L. Basic Life Support Knowledge among Junior Medical and Dental Students, Communication Channels, and the COVID-19 Pandemic. Medicina 2022;58(8):1073 View
  39. Suppan M, Stuby L, Harbarth S, Fehlmann C, Achab S, Abbas M, Suppan L. Nationwide Deployment of a Serious Game Designed to Improve COVID-19 Infection Prevention Practices in Switzerland: Prospective Web-Based Study. JMIR Serious Games 2021;9(4):e33003 View
  40. French D, Miles L, Elbourne D, Farmer A, Gulliford M, Locock L, Sutton S, McCambridge J. Reducing bias in trials from reactions to measurement: the MERIT study including developmental work and expert workshop. Health Technology Assessment 2021;25(55):1 View
  41. Bendtsen M, Garnett C, Toner P, Shorter G. The effect of question order on outcomes in the orbital core outcome set for alcohol brief interventions among online help-seekers (QOBCOS): Findings from a randomised factorial trial. DIGITAL HEALTH 2023;9 View
  42. Spennemann D. Persistence and Attrition among Participants in a Multi-Page Online Survey Recruited via Reddit’s Social Media Network. Social Sciences 2022;11(2):31 View
  43. Lorthe E, Santos C, Ornelas J, Doetsch J, Marques S, Teixeira R, Santos A, Rodrigues C, Gonçalves G, Ferreira Sousa P, Correia Lopes J, Rocha A, Barros H. Using Digital Tools to Study the Health of Adults Born Preterm at a Large Scale: e-Cohort Pilot Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e39854 View
  44. Tomczak J, Gordon A, Adams J, Pickering J, Hodges N, Evershed J. What over 1,000,000 participants tell us about online research protocols. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2023;17 View
  45. Leuchter R, Ma S, Bell D, Hays R, Vidorreta F, Binder S, Sarkisian C. Embedding research study recruitment within the patient portal preCheck-in. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2023;30(12):2028 View
  46. Lo A, Renshon J, Bassan-Nygate L. A Practical Guide to Dealing with Attrition in Political Science Experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science 2024;11(2):147 View
  47. Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Woolf B, Perkins C. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2023;2023(11) View
  48. Fields B, Carbery M, Schulz R, Rodakowski J, Terhorst L, Still C, Phinney A. Evaluation of Face Validity and Acceptability of the Care Partner Hospital Assessment Tool. Innovation in Aging 2023;7(2) View
  49. Brueton V, Tierney J, Stenning S, Meredith S, Harding S, Nazareth I, Rait G. Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2014;4(2):e003821 View
  50. Boekhout J, Hut R, Lechner L, Peels D. “I Don’t Believe in Age; I Believe in Staying Enthusiastic”: An Exploratory Qualitative Study into Recruitment Strategies Stimulating Middle-Aged and Older Adults to Join Physical Activity Interventions. Geriatrics 2024;9(3):80 View
  51. Bachmann J, Shiflet M, Palacios J, Turer R, Wallace G, Rosenbloom S, Rice T. Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Clinical Practice: Practical Guidance for Institutional Review Boards. Ethics & Human Research 2024;46(4):27 View
  52. Khan I, Bashar M, Haider J. A Study Exploring Factors Affecting Participation and Response in Online Surveys Among Health-Care Workers. Journal of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences University 2022;17(2):311 View
  53. Leaf C, Turner R, Paulson R, Lynch G, Leaf A. Psychometric testing of a new instrument for assessing individual's mindfulness, abilities, and well-being outcomes: The Leaf Mind Management (LMM) scale. Current Psychology 2024;43(38):30081 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Powell L, Kaufmann P, Freedland K. Behavioral Clinical Trials for Chronic Diseases. View
  2. Coşkun B, Dirlik E. Handbook of Research on Advanced Research Methodologies for a Digital Society. View