This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Consumer & Patient Education and Shared-Decision Making (680) Quality/Credibility of eHealth Information and Trust Issues (531) Participatory Medicine & E-Patients (774)

Published on in Vol 12, No 2 (2010): Apr-Jun

An International Comparison of Web-based Reporting About Health Care Quality: Content Analysis

An International Comparison of Web-based Reporting About Health Care Quality: Content Analysis

An International Comparison of Web-based Reporting About Health Care Quality: Content Analysis

Authors of this article:

Olga C. Damman1 ;   Ylva K.A. van den Hengel2 ;   A. Jeanne M. van Loon2 ;   Jany Rademakers1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (29) Tweetations Metrics

Journals

  1. Chen J, Presson A, Zhang C, Ray D, Finlayson S, Glasgow R. Online physician review websites poorly correlate to a validated metric of patient satisfaction. Journal of Surgical Research 2018;227:1 View
  2. Bidmon S, Elshiewy O, Terlutter R, Boztug Y. What Patients Value in Physicians: Analyzing Drivers of Patient Satisfaction Using Physician-Rating Website Data. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(2):e13830 View
  3. Emmert M, Wiener M. What factors determine the intention to use hospital report cards? The perspectives of users and non-users. Patient Education and Counseling 2017;100(7):1394 View
  4. Zwijnenberg N, Damman O, Spreeuwenberg P, Hendriks M, Rademakers J. Different patient subgroup, different ranking? Which quality indicators do patients find important when choosing a hospital for hip- or knee arthroplasty?. BMC Health Services Research 2011;11(1) View
  5. Sander U, Emmert M, Dickel J, Meszmer N, Kolb B. Information Presentation Features and Comprehensibility of Hospital Report Cards: Design Analysis and Online Survey Among Users. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2015;17(3):e68 View
  6. Rodrigues R, Trigg L, Schmidt A, Leichsenring K. The public gets what the public wants: Experiences of public reporting in long-term care in Europe. Health Policy 2014;116(1):84 View
  7. Emmert M, Hessemer S, Meszmer N, Sander U. Do German hospital report cards have the potential to improve the quality of care?. Health Policy 2014;118(3):386 View
  8. Nijman J, Hendriks M, Brabers A, de Jong J, Rademakers J. Patient Activation and Health Literacy as Predictors of Health Information Use in a General Sample of Dutch Health Care Consumers. Journal of Health Communication 2014;19(8):955 View
  9. Damman O, De Jong A, Hibbard J, Timmermans D. Making comparative performance information more comprehensible: an experimental evaluation of the impact of formats on consumer understanding. BMJ Quality & Safety 2016;25(11):860 View
  10. Damman O, Hendriks M, Rademakers J, Spreeuwenberg P, Delnoij D, Groenewegen P. Consumers’ interpretation and use of comparative information on the quality of health care: the effect of presentation approaches. Health Expectations 2012;15(2):197 View
  11. Mikkers M, Ryan P. 'Managed Competition' for Ireland?. SSRN Electronic Journal 2011 View
  12. Emmert M, Sauter L, Jablonski L, Sander U, Taheri-Zadeh F. Do Physicians Respond to Web-Based Patient Ratings? An Analysis of Physicians’ Responses to More Than One Million Web-Based Ratings Over a Six-Year Period. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(7):e275 View
  13. Ketelaar N, Faber M, Flottorp S, Rygh L, Deane K, Eccles M. Public release of performance data in changing the behaviour of healthcare consumers, professionals or organisations. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011 View
  14. Reimann S, Strech D. The representation of patient experience and satisfaction in physician rating sites. A criteria-based analysis of English- and German-language sites. BMC Health Services Research 2010;10(1) View
  15. Delnoij D, Sauter W. Patient information under the EU patients' rights Directive. The European Journal of Public Health 2011;21(3):271 View
  16. Smith M, Bednarz L, Nordby P, Fink J, Greenlee R, Bolt D, Magnan E. Increasing Consumer Engagement by Tailoring a Public Reporting Website on the Quality of Diabetes Care: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2016;18(12):e332 View
  17. Kraakevik J. Crafting a positive professional digital profile to augment your practice. Neurology: Clinical Practice 2016;6(1):87 View
  18. Metcalfe D, Rios Diaz A, Olufajo O, Massa M, Ketelaar N, Flottorp S, Perry D. Impact of public release of performance data on the behaviour of healthcare consumers and providers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2018;2018(9) View
  19. Huerta T, Hefner J, Ford E, McAlearney A, Menachemi N. Hospital Website Rankings in the United States: Expanding Benchmarks and Standards for Effective Consumer Engagement. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(2):e64 View
  20. Damman O, Spreeuwenberg P, Rademakers J, Hendriks M. Creating Compact Comparative Health Care Information. Medical Decision Making 2012;32(2):287 View
  21. Geraedts M, Hermeling P, de Cruppé W. Communicating quality of care information to physicians: A study of eight presentation formats. Patient Education and Counseling 2012;87(3):375 View
  22. Ivanković D, Barbazza E, Bos V, Brito Fernandes Ó, Jamieson Gilmore K, Jansen T, Kara P, Larrain N, Lu S, Meza-Torres B, Mulyanto J, Poldrugovac M, Rotar A, Wang S, Willmington C, Yang Y, Yelgezekova Z, Allin S, Klazinga N, Kringos D. Features Constituting Actionable COVID-19 Dashboards: Descriptive Assessment and Expert Appraisal of 158 Public Web-Based COVID-19 Dashboards. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(2):e25682 View
  23. Barbazza E, Ivanković D, Davtyan K, Poldrugovac M, Yelgezekova Z, Willmington C, Meza-Torres B, Bos V, Fernandes Ó, Rotar A, Nuti S, Vainieri M, Carinci F, Azzopardi-Muscat N, Groene O, Novillo-Ortiz D, Klazinga N, Kringos D. The experiences of 33 national COVID-19 dashboard teams during the first year of the pandemic in the World Health Organization European Region: A qualitative study. DIGITAL HEALTH 2022;8:205520762211211 View
  24. Yılmaz N, Timmermans D, Van Weert J, Damman O. Breast cancer patients’ visual attention to information in hospital report cards: An eye-tracking study on differences between younger and older female patients. Health Informatics Journal 2023;29(1) View
  25. Wangler J, Jansky M. Nutzungsvoraussetzungen und Einfluss von Arztbewertungsportalen – Befunde einer Befragungsstudie. Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung 2024;19(3):343 View
  26. Ossebaard H, van Gemert‐Pijnen L, Seydel E. Technology for Transparency: The Case of the Web‐Based Dutch National Health Portal. Policy & Internet 2012;4(2):1 View
  27. Kast K, Otten S, Konopik J, Maier C. Web-Based Public Reporting as a Decision-Making Tool for Consumers of Long-Term Care in the United States and the United Kingdom: Systematic Analysis of Report Cards. JMIR Formative Research 2023;7:e44382 View
  28. Ranjan P, Nandi D, Kaur K, Rajiv R, Shrivastav K, Ghosh A, Deshpande A, Samanta S, Janardhanan R. An Indigenous Computational Platform for Nowcasting and Forecasting Non-Linear Spread of COVID-19 across the Indian Sub-continent: A Geo-Temporal Visualization of Data. Procedia Computer Science 2024;235:496 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. John B, Gururajan R, Wickramasinghe N. Contemporary Consumer Health Informatics. View