Published on in Vol 11, No 1 (2009): Jan-Mar

Comparing Administration of Questionnaires via the Internet to Pen-and-Paper in Patients with Heart Failure: Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparing Administration of Questionnaires via the Internet to Pen-and-Paper in Patients with Heart Failure: Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparing Administration of Questionnaires via the Internet to Pen-and-Paper in Patients with Heart Failure: Randomized Controlled Trial

Journals

  1. Vleeschouwer M, Schubart C, Henquet C, Myin-Germeys I, van Gastel W, Hillegers M, van Os J, Boks M, Derks E, Miles J. Does Assessment Type Matter? A Measurement Invariance Analysis of Online and Paper and Pencil Assessment of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE). PLoS ONE 2014;9(1):e84011 View
  2. Lee H, Park J, Choi S, Yoon Y, Park H, Lee S, Lee S, Kim H, Cho H, Choi S, Lee H, Choi J, Lee Y, Kim Y, Cho G, Choi J, Sohn D. Impact of a Telehealth Program With Voice Recognition Technology in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: Feasibility Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2017;5(10):e127 View
  3. Meier J, Remenschneider A, D'Amico L, Holbrook E, Gray S, Metson R. A new model for collection of clinical outcomes data in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology 2014;4(5):411 View
  4. Kim Y, Delen D. Medical informatics research trend analysis: A text mining approach. Health Informatics Journal 2018;24(4):432 View
  5. Crutzen R, Göritz A. Social desirability and self-reported health risk behaviors in web-based research: three longitudinal studies. BMC Public Health 2010;10(1) View
  6. van Mierlo T, Li X, Hyatt D, Ching A. Demographic and Indication-Specific Characteristics Have Limited Association With Social Network Engagement: Evidence From 24,954 Members of Four Health Care Support Groups. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(2):e40 View
  7. Dainesi S, Goldbaum M. E-survey with researchers, members of ethics committees and sponsors of clinical research in Brazil: an emerging methodology for scientific research. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia 2012;15(4):705 View
  8. Smith D, Ropar D, Allen H. Does stereopsis account for the link between motor and social skills in adults?. Molecular Autism 2018;9(1) View
  9. Mathai S, Ghofrani H, Mayer E, Pepke-Zaba J, Nikkho S, Simonneau G. Quality of life in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. European Respiratory Journal 2016;48(2):526 View
  10. Campbell N, Ali F, Finlay A, Salek S. Equivalence of electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research 2015;24(8):1949 View
  11. Bonevski B, Campbell E, Sanson-Fisher R. The validity and reliability of an interactive computer tobacco and alcohol use survey in general practice. Addictive Behaviors 2010;35(5):492 View
  12. Lin C, Lu M, Chung C, Yang C. The Establishment of an Ethical Guideline for Genetic Testing Through Citizen Consensus via the Internet in Taiwan. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2010;12(4):e47 View
  13. Robertson A, Simmons D. The Relationship between Sensory Sensitivity and Autistic Traits in the General Population. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 2013;43(4):775 View
  14. Feldman S, Lapidus N, Cosnes J, Tiret E, Fonquernie L, Cabane J, Chazouilleres O, Surgers L, Beaussier M, Valleron A, Carrat F, Hejblum G. Comparing Inpatient Satisfaction Collected via a Web-Based Questionnaire Self-Completion and Through a Telephone Interview: An Ancillary Study of the SENTIPAT Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(8):e293 View
  15. Ashley L, Keding A, Brown J, Velikova G, Wright P. Score equivalence of electronic and paper versions of the Social Difficulties Inventory (SDI-21): a randomised crossover trial in cancer patients. Quality of Life Research 2013;22(6):1435 View
  16. Crutzen R, Göritz A. Does social desirability compromise self-reports of physical activity in web-based research?. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2011;8(1):31 View
  17. Lascelles B, Brown D, Conzemius M, Gill M, Oshinsky M, Sharkey M. Measurement of chronic pain in companion animals: Priorities for future research and development based on discussions from the Pain in Animals Workshop (PAW) 2017. The Veterinary Journal 2019;252:105370 View
  18. Mufidati D, Widyawati M, Suryono S. Web-based rule-based expert system to screen postpartum depression. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2021;1108(1):012020 View
  19. Muehlhausen W, Doll H, Quadri N, Fordham B, O’Donohoe P, Dogar N, Wild D. Equivalence of electronic and paper administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies conducted between 2007 and 2013. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2015;13(1) View
  20. Austin R, Schoonhoven L, Koutra V, Richardson A, Kalra P, May C. SYMptoms in chronic heart failure imPACT on burden of treatment (SYMPACT): a cross‐sectional survey. ESC Heart Failure 2022;9(4):2279 View
  21. Wingood M, Jones S, Gell N, Brach J, Peters D. Evaluation of Electronic and Pen-and-Paper Formats of the Inventory of Physical Activity Barriers: A Randomized Crossover Study. Journal of Physical Activity and Health 2022;19(8):540 View
  22. Lichtlé J, Devouche E, Downes N, Mottron L, Cappe E. Psychometric validation of the French version of the PedsQLTM4.0 generic health-related quality of life questionnaire for 2–4-year-old children. European Journal of Pediatrics 2023;182(3):1213 View
  23. Lascelles B, Brown D, Conzemius M, Gill M, Oshinsky M, Sharkey M. The beneficial role of companion animals in translational pain research. Frontiers in Pain Research 2022;3 View