This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Editorial (49)

Published on in Vol 6, No 3 (2004):

Will Web Surveys Ever Become Part of Mainstream Research?

Will Web Surveys Ever Become Part of Mainstream Research?

Will Web Surveys Ever Become Part of Mainstream Research?

Authors of this article:

Matthias Schonlau
Article Authors Cited by (27) Tweetations (1) Metrics

Journals

  1. Jones M, Calzavara L, Allman D, Worthington C, Tyndall M, Iveniuk J. A Comparison of Web and Telephone Responses From a National HIV and AIDS Survey. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 2016;2(2):e37 View
  2. Hallett J, Howat P, Maycock B, McManus A, Kypri K, Dhaliwal S. Undergraduate student drinking and related harms at an Australian university: web-based survey of a large random sample. BMC Public Health 2012;12(1) View
  3. Raat H, Mangunkusumo R, Landgraf J, Kloek G, Brug J. Feasibility, reliability, and validity of adolescent health status measurement by the Child Health Questionnaire Child Form (CHQ-CF): internet administration compared with the standard paper version. Quality of Life Research 2007;16(4):675 View
  4. O'Brien K, Solomon P, Worthington C, Ibáñez-Carrasco F, Baxter L, Nixon S, Baltzer-Turje R, Robinson G, Zack E. Considerations for Conducting Web-Based Survey Research With People Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Using a Community-Based Participatory Approach. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(3):e81 View
  5. Chien T, Wang W, Lin S, Lin C, Guo H, Su S. KIDMAP, a web based system for gathering patients' feedback on their doctors. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2009;9(1) View
  6. Leem J, Kim Y, Heo J, Jung M, Kim S, Lee H, Park J, Kim T. Experiences, perceptions and needs on the education of evidence-based medicine among Korean Medicine college students: A nationwide online survey. European Journal of Integrative Medicine 2017;15:10 View
  7. Liu H, Cella D, Gershon R, Shen J, Morales L, Riley W, Hays R. Representativeness of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Internet panel. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2010;63(11):1169 View
  8. Mari J, Franczia P, Margas W, Rutkowski J, Bebrysz M, Bokiniec R, Seliga‐Siwecka J. International consensus is needed on premedication for non‐emergency neonatal intubation after survey found wide‐ranging policies and practices in 70 countries. Acta Paediatrica 2020;109(7):1369 View
  9. Khazaal Y, van Singer M, Chatton A, Achab S, Zullino D, Rothen S, Khan R, Billieux J, Thorens G. Does Self-Selection Affect Samples’ Representativeness in Online Surveys? An Investigation in Online Video Game Research. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(7):e164 View
  10. Dobrow M, Orchard M, Golden B, Holowaty E, Paszat L, Brown A, Sullivan T. Response Audit of an Internet Survey of Health Care Providers and Administrators: Implications for Determination of Response Rates. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2008;10(4):e30 View
  11. Erens B, Burkill S, Couper M, Conrad F, Clifton S, Tanton C, Phelps A, Datta J, Mercer C, Sonnenberg P, Prah P, Mitchell K, Wellings K, Johnson A, Copas A. Nonprobability Web Surveys to Measure Sexual Behaviors and Attitudes in the General Population: A Comparison With a Probability Sample Interview Survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16(12):e276 View
  12. Eysenbach G. Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). Journal of Medical Internet Research 2004;6(3):e34 View
  13. Black J, Rockhill K, Forber A, Amioka E, May K, Haynes C, Dasgupta N, Dart R. An Online Survey for Pharmacoepidemiological Investigation (Survey of Non-Medical Use of Prescription Drugs Program): Validation Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(10):e15830 View
  14. Blank D, Hohgraefe Neto G, Grando E, Siqueira P, Lunkes R, Pietrobeli J, Marzola N, Goldani M. A Web-based survey on students' conceptions of ‘accident’. Informatics for Health and Social Care 2009;34(4):189 View
  15. Dainesi S, Goldbaum M. E-survey with researchers, members of ethics committees and sponsors of clinical research in Brazil: an emerging methodology for scientific research. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia 2012;15(4):705 View
  16. Boschman J, van der Molen H, Frings-Dresen M, Sluiter J. Response rate of bricklayers and supervisors on an internet or a paper-and-pencil questionnaire. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 2012;42(1):178 View
  17. Tsuboi S, Yoshida H, Ae R, Kojo T, Nakamura Y, Kitamura K. Selection Bias of Internet Panel Surveys. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health 2015;27(2):NP2390 View
  18. Whitehead L. Methodological and ethical issues in Internet-mediated research in the field of health: An integrated review of the literature. Social Science & Medicine 2007;65(4):782 View
  19. Brøgger J, Nystad W, Cappelen I, Bakke P. No Increase in Response Rate by Adding a Web Response Option to a Postal Population Survey: A Randomized Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2007;9(5):e40 View
  20. Peterson E, Rayner S, Armstrong S. Researching the psychology of cognitive style and learning style: Is there really a future?. Learning and Individual Differences 2009;19(4):518 View
  21. Oppenheimer A, Pannucci C, Kasten S, Haase S. Survey Says? A Primer on Web-Based Survey Design and Distribution. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2011;128(1):299 View
  22. Thompson K, Eakman A, Owens L. Factors Affecting the Number of Students Engaged in Mental Health Fieldwork Education. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health 2012;28(1):1 View
  23. Kiyohara K, Tabuchi T. Use of heated tobacco products in smoke-free locations in Japan: the JASTIS 2019 study. Tobacco Control 2022;31(1):65 View
  24. Druică E, Ianole-Călin R, Băicuș C, Dinescu R. Determinants of Satisfaction with Services, and Trust in the Information Received in Community Pharmacies: A Comparative Analysis to Foster Pharmaceutical Care Adoption. Healthcare 2021;9(5):562 View
  25. Karl J, Fischer R, Druică E, Musso F, Stan A. Testing the Effectiveness of the Health Belief Model in Predicting Preventive Behavior During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Case of Romania and Italy. Frontiers in Psychology 2022;12 View
  26. Ratzki-Leewing A, Ryan B, Zou G, Webster-Bogaert S, Black J, Stirling K, Timcevska K, Khan N, Buchenberger J, Harris S. Predicting Real-world Hypoglycemia Risk in American Adults With Type 1 or 2 Diabetes Mellitus Prescribed Insulin and/or Secretagogues: Protocol for a Prospective, 12-Wave Internet-Based Panel Survey With Email Support (the iNPHORM [Investigating Novel Predictions of Hypoglycemia Occurrence Using Real-world Models] Study). JMIR Research Protocols 2022;11(2):e33726 View
  27. Perriat D, Mertens E, Dreesman J. Use of a non-probabilistic online panel as a control group for case–control studies to investigate food and waterborne outbreaks in Lower Saxony, Germany. Epidemiology and Infection 2022;150 View