Published on in Vol 2, No suppl2 (2000): Supplement 2

A framework for evaluating e-health: Systematic review of studies assessing the quality of health information and services for patients on the Internet

A framework for evaluating e-health: Systematic review of studies assessing the quality of health information and services for patients on the Internet

A framework for evaluating e-health: Systematic review of studies assessing the quality of health information and services for patients on the Internet

Authors of this article:

Gunther Eysenbach

Journals

  1. Wright S, Tseng W, Kolodner K. Physician opinion about electronic publications. The American Journal of Medicine 2001;110(5):373 View
  2. Finn J, Krysik J. Agency-Based Social Workers' Attitudes and Behaviors Regarding Service-Related Unsolicited E-mail. Journal of Technology in Human Services 2007;25(3):21 View
  3. Castrén J, Huttunen T, Kunttu K. Users and non-users of web-based health advice service among Finnish university students – chronic conditions and self-reported health status (a cross-sectional study). BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2008;8(1) View
  4. Sidhu H, Raynor D, Knapp P. Evaluation of website medicines information content, in comparison with official patient information. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice 2010;14(3):189 View
  5. Bouchier H, Bath P. Evaluation of Websites that Provide Information on Alzheimer's Disease. Health Informatics Journal 2003;9(1):17 View
  6. Martin-Facklam M, Kostrzewa M, Schubert F, Gasse C, Haefeli W. Quality markers of drug information on the internet: an evaluation of sites about St. John’s Wort. The American Journal of Medicine 2002;113(9):740 View
  7. KOH S, CATTELL G, COCHRAN D, KRASNER A, LANGHEIM F, SASSO D. Psychiatrists’ Use of Electronic Communication and Social Media and a Proposed Framework for Future Guidelines. Journal of Psychiatric Practice 2013;19(3):254 View
  8. Battineni G, Baldoni S, Chintalapudi N, Sagaro G, Pallotta G, Nittari G, Amenta F. Factors affecting the quality and reliability of online health information. DIGITAL HEALTH 2020;6:205520762094899 View
  9. Chang K, Grubbs E, Ingledew P. AN ANALYSIS OF THE QUALITY OF THYROID CANCER WEBSITES. Endocrine Practice 2019;25(10):1003 View
  10. Ganeshkumar P, Bhatnagar A, Burka D, Durgad K, Krishna A, Das B, Chandak M, Sharma M, Shivasankar R, Pathni A, Kunwar A, Kaur P. Discovery, development, and deployment of a user-centered point-of-care digital information system to treat and track hypertension and diabetes patients under India Hypertension Control Initiative 2019–2022, India. DIGITAL HEALTH 2024;10 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Eysenbach G. Consumer Health Informatics. View
  2. Eysenbach G. Consumer Health Informatics. View