Published on in Vol 1, No 1 (1999):

Medical pioneers in cyberspace: German practice owners advertising on the WWW

Medical pioneers in cyberspace: German practice owners advertising on the WWW

Medical pioneers in cyberspace: German practice owners advertising on the WWW

Authors of this article:

Claudia Schuh

Short Paper

Corresponding Author:

Claudia Schuh

Voss-Strasse 63

30163 Hannover

Germany

Email: n3x31001@rrzn-user.uni-hannover.de

URI: http://unics.rrzn.uni-hannover.de/schuh


Background: In the last few years, the number of Internet users has increased explosively. In the same way the number of Internet users has exploded, the costs in the public health sector have also increased. This resulted cost saving efforts by those responsible people in politics and medical administration. These economy measures have impacted in particular the established physicians. The current German practice owners are faced with an unknown economic situation and are forced to think and act like businessmen. Doubts arise concerning the age-old tradition of the advertising prohibition. Now advertisement is recognized as an important necessity.

Objectives: This study was conducted to answer the following questions:

Methods: Built on a detailed analysis of the relevant German and international literature, hypotheses were developed which were empirically checked in the further course of the work. For this purpose, an online survey was conducted on the WWW among established German physicians with their own websites.

Results: 194 physicians participated and 159 valid questionnaires were included in the analysis. The study revealed the following results:
The age and sex distribution as well as the distribution of medical specialties in the examined group correspond to the expectations.
A high percentage of the respondents participated in a medical professional organization.
The median time in practice for practice age of the respondents was a little more than ten years.
Many of the websites have been online less than one year.
The following hypotheses could only partly be confirmed by the results of the survey:
Physicians from different specialties deal with their own website differently.
The Internet Familiarity of the physicians is responsible for the importance they attach to advertisement on the web, particularly to their own website.
Surprisingly, the attitude towards the advertising prohibition in Germany, apparently results less from economic considerations than from age-conditioned opinions.
The size of a medical practice did not influence the attitude of the physicians towards their own website. However, the type of practice in which a physician works played a crucial role in this context.

Conclusion: At present, the importance of the Internet for recruiting new patients is still small, but we anticipate it will continue to expand in the future.

J Med Internet Res 1999;1(1):e2

doi:10.2196/jmir.1.1.e2

Keywords



This article results from a diploma thesis in media sciences written at the Institut für Journalistik und Kommunikationsforschung, Hochschule für Musik und Theater Hannover, Germany.

In the last years, the number of Internet users has exploded. As the Internet becomes a greater factor in both the fields of media and of economy, new users get access, new research and consulting requirements and new markets arise, and all this in a breath-taking speed.

In the same way the number of Internet users has exploded, the costs in the public health sector have also increased during this time in Germany. This resulted in cost saving efforts by those responsible people in politics and administration. These economy measures have impacted in particular the established physicians. The German practice owners are faced with an unknown economic situation: competitive conditions resulting from empty cash-boxes and a competition for patients and budgets force the physicians to think and act like businessmen. Doubts arise concerning the age-old tradition of the advertising prohibition. Now advertising is recognized as an important necessity. In Germany, physicians advertising on the WWW has only recently become possible [1,2] and is still being discussed and debated by lawyers and judges as well as by the members of the medical organizations defending the age-old professional ethics prohibiting advertising [3,4,5].

Various reasons can be listed for these changes: First, there are juridical questions: the advertising prohibition breaks some rules of the German constitution [6,7,8,9,10,11,12] and the European convention on human rights [13]. Second, the increasing Europeanizing and globalization of economies and markets demands an adaptation of German rules to those of other countries in order to equalize competitive conditions among physicians [4]. Finally, the advertising prohibition obstructs competition between physicians in Germany, too, a fact which collides with the concept of a market economy [14,15].

This study also investigated the relationship of physicians to the information technology, their knowledge, use of computers and especially of the Internet. Prior research from other institutions showed that the use of computers and of the Internet among established physicians depends on the age of the physician. Compared to the "general" German Internet user (most of them are between 20 and 29 years old) [16,17], medical users are older with a median age of 45 years [18,19,20]. Another important consideration is the medical specialty of the physicians using the Internet: It has been shown that physicians from different specialties show a different affinity for the use of computers. This can be concluded from the number of practices delivering their quarterly cost overview electronically. Orthopedists, urologists, general practitioners, oto-laryngologists and gynecologists were highest, whereas radiologists, neurologists, psychotherapeutists, anaesthesists, and pathologists do not use computers for this purpose very often [21]. Male physicians use the Internet much more often than female doctors.

Additionally German physicians from large and partnership practices tend to be more frequent medical online users [19,22].

A number of hypotheses were been concluded from the theoretical background information:

  1. Physicians with an "open-minded" attitude towards IT and Internet attach a higher importance to the own website than those who are less "open-minded."
  2. Physicians who are familiar with IT and Internet attach a greater importance to their own website than those who are less familiar with IT and Internet do.
  3. Younger physicians and physicians from younger practices are more open-minded towards a breakdown of the advertising prohibition than older physicians and physicians from older practices.
  4. For physicians from younger practices, the motive of "winning new patients" is more important than for physicians from older practices.
  5. Physicians from partnership practices and group practices attach a higher importance to advertising on the WWW than physicians from small and single practices.
  6. Male physicians are much more likely than female physicians to have their own practice websites.
  7. Physicians participate in professional medical politics and organizations are more "open-minded" towards a breakdown of the advertising prohibition than those who participate less.

Between October 31st, 1998 and February 17th, 1999, a WWW survey was conducted. German, Austrian and Swiss established physicians were asked to participate by email, by several user net postings (in medical newsgroups and in a newsgroup announcing German web surveys) as well as with publications in German popular medical media and by hyperlinks from other medical websites. Dentists or physicians working in hospitals were not included in the survey.

The original questionnaire (in German language) can be visited at the http://unics.rrzn.uni-hannover.de/schuh/frabo01.html. It was developed using Netscape Communicator 4.06 and an evaluation version of Perseus Survey Solutions for the Web. The questionnaire was edited in simple HTML without any java applets or special scripts in order to enable a maximum of the addressed users to view it with their browsers.

The questionnaire consists of the following thematic groups of questions:

  • the physician himself, his motives and attitudes
  • the website, its age, size etc.
  • feedback to the website
  • the sociodemographical data of the respondents

In addition to the questionnaire itself, there was an introduction page saying hello to the user and introducing the study very briefly. (http://unics.rrzn.uni-hannover.de/schuh/index-alt.html) This introduction page indicated hyperlinks to a support page for those who had never filled out a WWW questionnaire before (http://unics.rrzn.uni-hannover.de/schuh/hilfe4.html) as well as to a "more information" page informing the interested reader about framework, goals and hypotheses of the study (http://unics.rrzn.uni-hannover.de/schuh/claudia.html). All pages contain a mail-to link that enabled the user to send an email to the author. After filling out the questionnaire and sending it to the author, a "thank you" page appears.

In order to guarantee anonymity to the respondents, the completed questionnaires were sent back to the author via a U.S. remailer provided by Perseus to all users of their software.


194 physicians participated, and 159 valid questionnaires were included in the analysis and furnished the following results, represented by the corresponding tables:

To a large extent, the age (Table 2) and the sex (Table 1) distribution in the examined group corresponded to the expectations from the general information on medical Internet users.

The distribution of the specialties in the examined group (Table 3) did not surprise us after the figures presented in the theoretical section of this paper.

The high percentage of physicians engaged in professional organizations (Table 14) was remarkable in the examined group.

More than 20 percent of the respondents held a position in a professional organization. The median time in practice of a little more than ten years (Table 6) with a substantially smaller modus of five years permits the assumption that the number of physicians who present their practice on the WWW will further grow in the future.

Due to the economic conditions for the operation of a medical practice, as expected especially young practices count on this new method of advertising. This can also be concluded from the fact that many of the websites of the respondents had only been online for less than one year (Table 12).

However, winning new patients is a less important motive for running a website than retaining existing patients by offering a new or better service to them.

Table 1. Sex Distribution
frequency%valid %
ValidFemale127.57.6
Male14691.892.4
Total15899.4100.0
Missing1.6
Total159100.0
Table 3. Medical specialty
Frequency%valid %
ValidGeneral Practitioner5434.034.4
Anaesthesiology21.31.3
No Specialty127.57.6
Ophthalmology53.13.2
Surgery31.91.9
Dermatology21.31.3
Gynecology138.28.3
Otolaryngology53.13.2
Internal Medicine2314.514.6
Pediatrics31.91.9
Head and Neck Surgery31.91.9
Neurology53.13.2
Orthopedics95.75.7
Psychiatry21.31.3
Radiology21.31.3
Urology116.97.0
Other31.91.9
Total15798.7100.0
Missing21.3
Total159100.0
Table 2. Age Distribution
frequency%valid %
ValidLess than 30 years10.6.6
31-40 years4226.426.8
41-50 years8251.652.2
51 and + years3220.120.4
Total15798.7100.0
Missing21.3
Total159100.0
Table 6. Time in Practice
Frequency%valid %
ValidLess than 5 years3220.120.3
5 through less than 10 years5232.732.9
10 through less than 15 years3320.820.9
15 years or more4125.825.9
Total15899.4100.0
Missing1.6
Total159100.0
Table 12. Website Presence
frequency%
Valid< 3 months2012.6
3 through < 6 months2213.8
6 months through < 1 year4125.8
1 through < 1.5 years3522.0
1.5 years or longer4125.8
Total159100.0
Table 14. Participation in Medical Professional Politics
frequency%valid %
ValidNo6540.942.2
Yes, Attend meetings etc.5735.837.0
Yes, Holding Office3220.120.8
Total15496.9100.0
Missing53.1
Total159100.0

The hypotheses could only partly be confirmed by the results of the survey:

Physicians of different specialties deal with their own website differently. The specialty of a physician could be considered an indicator to how and how intensively he uses the advertising method of a website. It can be assumed that apart from the IT- and Internet open-mindedness, there are other decisive factors that were not examined in this study.

The Internet familiarity of the physicians (Table 10) is responsible for the importance they attach to advertisement on the web and particularly to the own website.

This hypothesis could be confirmed and suggests at the same time that the WWW will gain in importance as an advertising medium for established physicians. More than a third of the respondents had used the Internet for less than two years (Table 9); with the explosive growth of the Internet the number of new physician users will increase and with the growth, develop new websites.

Surprisingly, the attitude towards the advertising prohibition results apparently less from economic considerations than from age-conditioned opinions. The key factor is the age of the physician, not the age of the practice, although naturally young physicians tend to be associated with younger practices. Not surprisingly, the tendency to try winning new patients by means of advertisement and a pronounced economic consciousness are stronger among owners of younger practices.

The size of a medical practice (Table 5) did not influence the attitude of the physicians towards their own website. However, the type of practice in which a physician works played a crucial role in this context (Table 4).

Table 10. Internet Familiarity (Scale)
frequency%valid %
Valid2: Not familiar31.91.9
353.13.2
42113.213.3
53522.022.2
65232.732.9
71911.912.0
8116.97.0
9: Very familiar127.57.6
Total15899.4100.0
Missing1.6
Total159100.0
Table 9. Use of Internet
frequency%valid %
ValidLess than 6 months63.83.8
6 months through less than 1 year148.88.9
1 through less than 2 years3522.022.2
More than 2 years10364.865.2
Total15899.4100.0
Missing1.6
Total159100.0
Table 5. Size of Practice
frequency%valid %
ValidOne of the 5 largest5836.544.6
Medium5735.843.8
Small159.411.5
Total13081.8100.0
Missing2918.2
Total159100.0
Table 4. Type of Practice
frequency%valid %
ValidSingle practice9861.662.0
Partnership practice5937.137.3
Partnership with other medical professions (Group)1.6.6
Total15899.4100.0
Missing1.6
Total159100.0

Conclusion

In conclusion, it appears that the importance of the Internet for the recruitment of new patients is still small, but it will continue to expand in the future. This is indicated the results presented in this study, by the general development of the Internet, by the European direction of markets and juridical systems, and by the examples from other countries. The few website operators among the established physicians are doing the pioneering work in Cyberspace. It is hoped for them - the respondents of this survey - that their pioneer spirit will be rewarded.

Conflicts of Interest

None declared.

  1. ; Bundesärztekammer. (Muster-) Berufsordnung für die deutschen Ärztinnen und Ärzte - MBO-Ä 1997 - in der Fassung der Beschlüsse des 100. In: Deutschen Ärztetages in Eisenach. Bundesärztekammer: Bekanntmachung. Deutsches Ärzteblatt; 1997(94):A2354-A2363.
  2. , editor; Ärztekammer NiedersachsenÄrztekammer Niedersachsen. Berufsordnung der Ärztekammer Niedersachsen. In: Arztrecht in Niedersachsen. (=Niedersächsisches Ärzteblatt, Sonderheft, 10). Hannover: Hannoversche Ärzte-Verlags-Union; 1998:49-59.
  3. Martensen RL. Physician Advertising. JAMA 1994;272(12):1623. [CrossRef]
  4. Schulte K. Das standesrechtliche Werbeverbot für Ärzte Unter Berücksichtigung wettbewerbs- und kartellrechtlicher Bestimmungen. (= Recht & Medizin. 25). Frankfurt/ Main: Peter Lang; 1992.
  5. Morrice AAG. "The Medical Pundits": Doctors and Indirect Advertising in the Lay Press 1922-1927. Medical History 1994;38:255-280.
  6. Jarass HD. Die freien Berufe zwischen Standesrecht und Kommunikationsfreiheit. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 1982;35:1833-1840.
  7. Andreas M. Das Grundrecht auf Meinungsfreiheit begrenzt das strafrechtliche Werbeverbot. Arztrecht 1986;21(8):205.
  8. Kornblum U. Grenze zwischen Erlaubtem und Verbotenem. Ärztezeitung 1988;7(160):19.
  9. Kornblum U. Reklame versus Information: Gefahr und Nutzen. Ärztezeitung 1988;7(163):19.
  10. Pap M. Zur Zulässigkeit eines Arztinterviews in einer Illustrierten. Medizinrecht 1988;6(1):38-41.
  11. Papier HJ, Petz H. Rechtliche Grenzen des ärztlichen Werbeverbots. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 1994;47:1553-1562.
  12. Fishman RHB. Israeli doctors allowed to advertise. Lancet 1995;346(8990):1620. [CrossRef]
  13. Das Chaos zwischen Werbung und Klage. Ärzte Woche 1997;11(43):32.
  14. Deutsch E. Medizinrecht. Arztrecht, Arzneimittelrecht und Medizinprodukterecht. In: Eine zusammenfassende Darstellung mit Fallbeispielen und Texten, 3rd edition. Berlin et al: Springer Verlag; Apr 21, 1999.
  15. Hofstetter L. Arztrecht: Zulassung - Berufsausübung - Pflichtverletzungen. Erlangen: Perimed; 1991.
  16. Altersstruktur der Internet-Nutzer.   URL: http://www.horizont.net/special/archiv/SP_40KW_98/gfk1.htm [accessed 1998 Sept 28]
  17. van Eimeren B, Gerhard H, Oehmichen E, Schröter C. ARD/ZDF-Online-Studie 1998: Onlinemedien gewinnen an Bedeutung. Nutzung von Internet und Onlineangeboten elektronischer Medien in Deutschland 1998.
  18. Dettmar H. Schon ein Drittel der niedergelassenen Ärzte nutzt das Web zur Infobeschaffung. Horizont 1998;15(47):86.
  19. Matiaske B. Online-Nutzung von Ärzten. Neue Kommunikationstechnologien setzen sich bei Ärzten erst langsam durch.   URL: http://www.gfk.cube.net/website/presse/980624_1.htm [accessed 1998 Juli 23]
  20. Wie exklusiv sind Internet-Ärzte? Praxisnetz 1998;1(4):32.
  21. Installationsstatistiken. Praxis-EDV in Zahlen. PraxisComputer 1998;14(6):16.
  22. Soyez J. Online-Using niedergelassener Allgemeinärzte und Internisten. Planung & Analyse 1998;1:42-43.


HTML: Hypertext Markup Language
IT: Information Technology
WWW: World Wide Web


Edited by G Eysenbach; submitted 23.04.99; peer-reviewed by J Mack, H van der Slikke; accepted 29.04.99; published 05.08.99

Copyright

© Claudia Schuh. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 5.8.1999. Except where otherwise noted, articles published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, including full bibliographic details and the URL (see "please cite as" above), and this statement is included.