e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 70 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
CSV download: Download all 70 search results
(up to 5,000 articles maximum)
- 27 JMIR Research Protocols
- 14 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 6 JMIR Formative Research
- 5 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 4 JMIR Mental Health
- 4 JMIR Serious Games
- 2 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 1 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 1 JMIR Aging
- 1 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 1 JMIR Data
- 1 JMIR Dermatology
- 1 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 1 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 1 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
A randomized controlled trial was conducted to select children aged 2-7 years requiring venipuncture between May 2023 and November 2023 in the Department of Pediatrics of a tertiary hospital in Changsha City, Hunan Province, including the pediatric emergency department and pediatric ward, and the main reason for venipuncture was blood sampling, requiring peripheral intravenous access. This trial was reported using CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) guidelines.
JMIR Pediatr Parent 2025;8:e67918
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
This study was single-blind, meaning that participants were unaware of whether they had been randomized to the intervention or control group. Recruitment materials described the study’s objective as evaluating a family-based nutrition intervention, without specific reference to dairy products. Interested families could contact the research team via email or phone for further information and to complete an eligibility screening.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e66582
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
This study was a randomized controlled trial (RCT) aiming to improve participants’ health behavior and thus, weight loss [31]. Participants were assigned to one of the 3 treatment arms: e Health, e Health+Group, or e Health+Individual. Each treatment arm used an e Health program, Healthy Weight Coaching (HWC), extensively detailed by Suojanen et al [32]. In addition, the hybrid treatment arms received 3 remotely facilitated group or individual sessions.
JMIR Ment Health 2025;12:e66518
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Using community-engaged research strategies, we partnered with parents to refine the program and subsequently conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT). Consistent with the approach proposed by Baumann and Cabassa [19], we intentionally focused on intervention reach, design, and equity-relevant implementation outcomes. These insights can inform similar cross-sector education-health care partnerships that aim to promote equity for Latino DLLs and their families.
JMIR Pediatr Parent 2025;8:e60764
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
We conducted a 2-week exploratory double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing a Woebot for mood and anxiety with generative elements (Gen-W-MA, 81/160, 50.6%) against a rules-based version of this same product, that is, Woebot for mood and anxiety (W-MA, 79/160, 49.3%). W-MA is an investigational DMHI that delivers a guided self-help program using cognitive behavioral therapy, psychoeducation, and self-management tools through brief conversations with a relational agent named Woebot (Woebot Health).
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e67365
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Consumer-Grade Neurofeedback With Mindfulness Meditation: Meta-Analysis
For the present study, 2 types of randomized studies were included. We leveraged randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with between-participant controls as well as within-participant controls (ie, participants perform mb NF and meditation only, with the order randomized). The following open questions were addressed using quantitative synthesis: (1) Is there evidence that participants are learning to regulate brain signals using neurofeedback, and reporting higher mindfulness?
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e68204
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Doi et al [47] conducted a randomized controlled trial involving 142 patients with knee osteoarthritis. They found that a home-based quadriceps strengthening program involving 20 repetitions of a slow knee extension movement implemented 4 times daily for 8 weeks was as effective as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for improved pain, stiffness, physical function, and Qo L outcomes.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e58393
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
We thus performed an exploratory, prospective, open-label, parallel, single-center, randomized controlled trial (RCT) to investigate the effectiveness of CGM on short-term, in-hospital mortality among frail and critically ill patients with COVID-19.
This is an exploratory, prospective, open-label, parallel, single-center RCT.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e67012
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
In this study, we aimed to test whether the inclusion of tailored prompts aimed at achieving usage goals can increase the efficacy of an ICBT stress recovery intervention for health care workers in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). The “For Recovery from Stress” (FOREST) is a 6-week ICBT intervention [14], incorporating mindfulness and focused on stress recovery [15]. FOREST+ is the updated version of FOREST, designed to meet the needs of health care workers [5].
JMIR Ment Health 2025;12:e62782
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
This was a prospective randomized control trial assessing changes in the PSS and DASS-21 scores over a 12-week period. Both are validated questionnaires studied extensively in the literature [26,27].
The PSS consists of 10 items that measure the subjective feelings of the amount of stress in the participants by assessing thoughts and feelings in the previous month. Each question is scored from 0 (never) to 4 (very often) with a total possible score range of 0 to 40.
JMIR Bioinform Biotech 2024;5:e65506
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS