e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 540 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 142 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 105 JMIR Research Protocols
- 86 JMIR Formative Research
- 32 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 31 JMIR Human Factors
- 21 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 20 JMIR Mental Health
- 14 JMIR Aging
- 13 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 10 JMIR Cancer
- 10 JMIR Medical Education
- 8 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 8 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 6 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 5 Iproceedings
- 4 JMIR AI
- 4 JMIR Nursing
- 4 JMIR Serious Games
- 3 JMIR Diabetes
- 3 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 2 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 2 JMIR Cardio
- 2 JMIR Dermatology
- 2 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 1 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 1 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 1 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
How to Improve Pancreatic Cancer Network Care Using a Human-Centered Design Sprint
Reference 3: Impact of nationwide enhanced implementation of best practices in pancreatic cancer care Reference 21: Nurse knowledge exchange plus: human-centered implementation for spread and sustainability care platforms on quality of care for oncological patients and barriers and facilitators for their implementationimplementation
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e55598
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
We also engage community members and stakeholders in the implementation evaluation, forming the basis for community involvement in sustainable implementation of the STAR model in Appalachia and expansion into other regions of rural America.
The effectiveness and implementation of the STAR model are being assessed via 3 distinct aims.
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e77630
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Despite, and in part because of, operational challenges, it is valuable to examine implementation findings. While there are many trials of evidence-based i CBT programs in the peer-reviewed literature, there are few studies of how these programs perform in real-world settings [17,18].
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e66047
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Effective implementation of e VIN at the primary health care level is similar to a recent study that reported improvement in vaccines cold chain management after implementation of e VIN [21]. This could be because of the better user interface of e VIN or the smaller number of data elements to be entered on the e VIN portal. The RCH portal, although effectively implemented, needed improvement in its output indicators.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e69824
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Digital Tools for People Without an Alzheimer Disease or Dementia Diagnosis: Scoping Review
In addition, digital tools may not be fully developed to the extent that they are ready for large-scale implementation. The level of development of a digital tool can be determined on the basis of the stage of maturity and evaluation. The stage of maturity indicates how developed a digital tool is, whereas the stage of evaluation assesses implementation fidelity.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e64862
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Addressing this requires not only rigorous evidence of clinical value but also engaging providers in co-design and implementation [21]. Structured workshops and pilot programs can help embed these technologies in real-world settings, fostering trust and usability [21].
Cost and infrastructure constraints also impede adoption. Implementing and maintaining advanced technologies can be financially burdensome, particularly in underfunded systems [20,22].
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2025;13:e67435
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Implementing a Digital Physical Activity Intervention for Older Adults: Qualitative Study
In this paper, the terms “implementation team” and “implementation partners” are used to describe 2 broad sets of actors.
The implementation team was academics trying to get Active Lives to end users (via implementation partners). The implementation team was led by coauthor KB, a health psychologist involved in developing and evaluating Active Lives and supported by 2 postdoctoral researchers (co-authors JJ and SM).
JMIR Aging 2025;8:e64953
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
After a pilot in Arusha faced significant implementation challenges, the system was abandoned. In response, a new e IR was developed and deployed in four regions by 2018, eventually expanding to 15 of the country’s 26 regions through a phased approach. Similarly, the e LMIS was introduced in 2015 with a stepped implementation, starting with a pretest in 7 regions, followed by gradual expansion to 15 regions the next year.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e62746
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
This funding was sufficient to fully support the implementation phase. The final product and intellectual property will remain under the ownership of HUG after implementation.
The development of Dolodoc required an estimated budget of approximately CHF 250,000 (US $250,000). A substantial portion of the budget was allocated to content creation and validation. The budget covers the complete lifecycle of Dolodoc creation and deployment, ensuring a robust foundation for ongoing use and impact.
JMIR Med Inform 2025;13:e71597
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
In implementation research, there is increasing recognition of the importance of stakeholder-informed strategies to support intervention adoption [21-24], that is, it is key to understand what stakeholders (in this case, patients who use technology for health) think the most effective ways are for promoting adoption and use of interventions and to design and tailor implementation strategies accordingly [25].
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e77113
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS