e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 3 of 3 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 2 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 1 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 JMIR Formative Research
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Geographical Disparities in Research Misconduct: Analyzing Retraction Patterns by Country
Retraction counts (1996-2023) were obtained from the Retraction Watch (RW) database, isolating retractions due to misconduct. Misconduct was defined according to criteria previously established [6] and detailed in Multimedia Appendix 1.
Both SJR and RW consider all authors listed on an article, regardless of position, when attributing publications and retractions, respectively, to a country. They use full counts, equally attributing publications and retractions to all listed countries.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e65775
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
A study of 113 Pub Med retraction notices from 2016 showed that fraud and plagiarism were found mainly in articles authored by men and errors in data and analysis were seen mainly in articles authored by women [4]. Another study using a database of retracted articles (1970-2022) showed that women represented 27% of first authors and 24% of last authors, but there was no comparison group (ie, the representation of women and men as authors of publications) [5].
J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e48529
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Retractions in Dermatology Literature Between 1982 and 2022: Cross-sectional Study
In this study, we evaluated retracted publications in the field of dermatology and explored the trends of retraction over the past four decades.
All retracted dermatology-related articles from 1982 to 2022 were identified on the Retraction Watch Database. The Retraction Watch Database, compiled and maintained by the Retraction Watch team, is the largest searchable database of retracted scientific articles publicly available to researchers [3].
JMIR Dermatol 2023;6:e39021
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS