e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 18 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 6 JMIR Research Protocols
- 5 JMIR Formative Research
- 2 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 2 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 2 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 1 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
We assessed performance through both quantitative and qualitative analyses. Quantitatively, we compared volume differences between AI and VR segmentations and examined factors influencing segmentation accuracy. Qualitatively, expert raters visually evaluated the segmentations using a newly developed protocol, which also enabled us to estimate the time-saving potential of the AI approach.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e60887
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
We used a mixed methods survey design to obtain information from survey questions, both quantitative and semiqualitative, providing complementary information, within the context of a clinical feasibility trial in an NHS setting [13].
Participants in the PD-Care program feasibility study were offered to participate in this wearable substudy.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e63704
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Qualitative and quantitative content analysis codebook, from the mixed methods study of Miners’ Wellness ECHOa participants, July 2018 to September 2019.
a ECHO: Extension for Community Health Outcomes.
b Utterances include statements of expertise, acceptance, and eschewal. Additional details are provided in Tables S1 and S2 in Multimedia Appendix 1.
c Not applicable.
We realize that evaluating others’ acceptance or eschewal can be subjective and difficult to determine by reading transcripts.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e67999
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
We used a convergent mixed-methods design for this study, in which qualitative data were analyzed based on the findings from the quantitative analysis [17]. We analyzed qualitative data to explain the differences in the impact of the conditional cash transfer intervention on health care utilization at participating facilities.
We conducted an ITS analysis using segmented linear regression without a control group.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2025;13:e60811
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Here we report the quantitative results of the Phase I study.
Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Rwanda School of Medicine Ethical Committee, and the study was registered with the institutional review board under number #271/CMHSIRB/2022. Participants were provided with all details regarding the study’s objectives, procedures, potential risks, and benefits before requesting consent. At this time, any questions were addressed, and privacy and confidentiality policies were explained.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e64585
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Patient-related factors that influence engagement in RBPM have been driven mostly by qualitative studies [21-26] and less by the quantitative assessment of patients’ characteristics to identify predictors of engagement [27]. Quantitative assessment of technology health behaviors focused on RBPM participation are therefore warranted.
JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e56954
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
The search strategy is designed to identify studies using qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches that investigate HCPs’ perspectives on the acceptability and usability of self-management systems. The PRISMA-Sc R (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews; Multimedia Appendix 1) and Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, and Studies (PICOS) frameworks were used to structure the protocol for the review strategy (Table 2) [35].
JMIR Res Protoc 2024;13:e58845
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS