e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 1 of 1 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 1 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 JMIR Formative Research
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Accuracy, Quality, and Misinformation of YouTube Abortion Procedural Videos: Cross-Sectional Study
Videos were categorized into 3 “video slant” groups: neutral, antichoice, and prochoice, based on the methodology by Han et al [2]. Videos were determined to have a prochoice or antichoice bias if either (1) information was given in a biased or dramatic fashion or (2) the video displayed an opinion regarding the provision of abortion and its legality. Otherwise, the video was considered neutral.
J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e50099
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS