e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 261 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 64 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 41 JMIR Research Protocols
- 38 JMIR Formative Research
- 21 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 16 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 12 JMIR Human Factors
- 12 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 10 JMIR Medical Education
- 9 JMIR Mental Health
- 8 Iproceedings
- 6 JMIR Serious Games
- 5 JMIRx Med
- 4 JMIR Aging
- 4 JMIR Cancer
- 2 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 2 JMIR AI
- 2 JMIR Cardio
- 1 JMIR Diabetes
- 1 JMIR Infodemiology
- 1 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 1 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 1 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
In particular, IOC across the development, evaluation, and implementation phases is crucial for the success of e Health in subsequent stages [12]. For example, technological features that can enhance successful implementation must be addressed during the development phase.
IOC, however, has proven to be rather complex.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e67839
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The evaluation was divided into 2 parts.
A 45-item questionnaire in the German language was provided to the participants after the testing of the GENIE mobile app. The questionnaire is structured into the categories: first impression, contents, app layout, usability, use, and willingness to pay. The categories, first impression, contents, and usability consist of an excerpt from Thielsch et al, 2017 [22] and the System Usability Scale by Brooke [23], respectively.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e69115
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Alongside this, we retrieved and assessed guidelines about DHS evaluation from health authorities in France (HAS), Germany (Bf Ar M), and the UK (NICE) [5-8]. These countries were chosen because of recent initiatives by their HTA authorities offering guidance on DHS assessment (Textbox 1).
JMIR Diabetes 2025;10:e52909
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The enrollment form collects participants’ baseline sociodemographic data, history of ART, strategies for taking ART, assessment of their adherence with the SMAQ, depression screening, stigma, an evaluation of their satisfaction with the health services provided at the study center, and a measurement of their knowledge about ART and adherence. For participants allocated to the self-designed messages arm, we also register their created messages in REDCap.
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e66941
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Design, Application, and Actionability of US Public Health Data Dashboards: Scoping Review
Inclusion criteria
Publication type: Full text, peer-reviewed journal articles, conference proceedings, book chapters, or published reports
Language: English
Scope and focus: Empirical (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods) case studies of design, implementation, and evaluation of a US-located national public health dashboard
Publication date: 2000 to 2023
Exclusion criteria
Publication type: Peer-reviewed abstract-only or publications for which full text is not available; non–peer-reviewed publications
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e65283
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Evaluating Generative AI in Mental Health: Systematic Review of Capabilities and Limitations
The lack of comprehensive and unified evaluation frameworks limited the scope and depth of conclusions the field could draw regarding Gen AI’s capabilities in mental health.
The psychoeducation capabilities of Gen AI in providing information related to mental health received the most evidence. This could be related to the single approach of using zero-shot prompting that was shared among almost all studies in this review.
JMIR Ment Health 2025;12:e70014
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Implementation of New Technologies in an Aged Care Social Day Program: Mixed Methods Evaluation
The Stakeholder Advisory Group was comprised of members of the organization and evaluation project team and a representative from each of the 3 stakeholder-participant groups (clients, family members or carers, and staff of the Social Day Program) and was formed to ensure consumer awareness and the suitability and feasibility of evaluation methods.
JMIR Aging 2025;8:e60297
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The survey was developed using a co-design approach with members of the Physician Think Tanks and was informed by the Benefits Evaluation Framework, benchmark survey data, and relevant literature. The survey underwent testing with the Physician Think Tank members to refine its topics, content, and wording. It was available from January to March 2023, with biweekly reminders sent to encourage participation.
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e65656
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
For the evaluation process of the “CONTIGO” mobile application, eligibility criteria were established for potential evaluators. This aims to ensure that evaluators possess the necessary expertise to provide meaningful feedback on the application’s functionalities and effectiveness in supporting patients.
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e60169
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Guideline-Incorporated Large Language Model-Driven Evaluation of Medical Records Using MedCheckLLM
One underexplored area is their application for the reliable evaluation of medical documents. The automated evaluation of these documents has the potential to enhance patient safety. The system’s reasoning process must be (1) transparent and comprehensible to human evaluators and (2) guided by established medical guidelines proven to increase patient safety [3].
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e53335
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS